diff options
author | Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> | 2023-05-29 15:46:59 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> | 2023-05-30 00:37:01 +0300 |
commit | c310ca82e229124e7b373125d82ea8fdbf2f9f81 (patch) | |
tree | f3ce31a6a84caee9ed9c8447c27e9d59f27639f3 /arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts | |
parent | 41e22c2ff38eaea777f1158071539e659aa7980d (diff) | |
download | linux-c310ca82e229124e7b373125d82ea8fdbf2f9f81.tar.xz |
arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts index d2abbdec5fe6..47580bd243eb 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ chassis-type = "handset"; aliases { - serial0 = &blsp1_uart2; + serial0 = &blsp_uart2; }; chosen { @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ }; }; -&blsp1_uart2 { +&blsp_uart2 { status = "okay"; }; |