diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-05-07 20:57:05 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-05-07 20:57:05 +0300 |
commit | 168e153d5ebbdd6a3fa85db1cc4879ed4b7030e0 (patch) | |
tree | 73d8583ff7a53a05f95e331ac6468e3741f20d10 /Documentation | |
parent | 8ff468c29e9a9c3afe9152c10c7b141343270bf3 (diff) | |
parent | f276ae0dd6d0b5bfbcb51178a63f06dc035f4cc4 (diff) | |
download | linux-168e153d5ebbdd6a3fa85db1cc4879ed4b7030e0.tar.xz |
Merge branch 'work.icache' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
Pull vfs inode freeing updates from Al Viro:
"Introduction of separate method for RCU-delayed part of
->destroy_inode() (if any).
Pretty much as posted, except that destroy_inode() stashes
->free_inode into the victim (anon-unioned with ->i_fops) before
scheduling i_callback() and the last two patches (sockfs conversion
and folding struct socket_wq into struct socket) are excluded - that
pair should go through netdev once davem reopens his tree"
* 'work.icache' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (58 commits)
orangefs: make use of ->free_inode()
shmem: make use of ->free_inode()
hugetlb: make use of ->free_inode()
overlayfs: make use of ->free_inode()
jfs: switch to ->free_inode()
fuse: switch to ->free_inode()
ext4: make use of ->free_inode()
ecryptfs: make use of ->free_inode()
ceph: use ->free_inode()
btrfs: use ->free_inode()
afs: switch to use of ->free_inode()
dax: make use of ->free_inode()
ntfs: switch to ->free_inode()
securityfs: switch to ->free_inode()
apparmor: switch to ->free_inode()
rpcpipe: switch to ->free_inode()
bpf: switch to ->free_inode()
mqueue: switch to ->free_inode()
ufs: switch to ->free_inode()
coda: switch to ->free_inode()
...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/Locking | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/porting | 25 |
2 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking index efea228ccd8a..7b20c385cc02 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ set: exclusive --------------------------- super_operations --------------------------- prototypes: struct inode *(*alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb); + void (*free_inode)(struct inode *); void (*destroy_inode)(struct inode *); void (*dirty_inode) (struct inode *, int flags); int (*write_inode) (struct inode *, struct writeback_control *wbc); @@ -139,6 +140,7 @@ locking rules: All may block [not true, see below] s_umount alloc_inode: +free_inode: called from RCU callback destroy_inode: dirty_inode: write_inode: diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting b/Documentation/filesystems/porting index cf43bc4dbf31..b8d3ddd8b8db 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting @@ -638,3 +638,28 @@ in your dentry operations instead. inode to d_splice_alias() will also do the right thing (equivalent of d_add(dentry, NULL); return NULL;), so that kind of special cases also doesn't need a separate treatment. +-- +[strongly recommended] + take the RCU-delayed parts of ->destroy_inode() into a new method - + ->free_inode(). If ->destroy_inode() becomes empty - all the better, + just get rid of it. Synchronous work (e.g. the stuff that can't + be done from an RCU callback, or any WARN_ON() where we want the + stack trace) *might* be movable to ->evict_inode(); however, + that goes only for the things that are not needed to balance something + done by ->alloc_inode(). IOW, if it's cleaning up the stuff that + might have accumulated over the life of in-core inode, ->evict_inode() + might be a fit. + + Rules for inode destruction: + * if ->destroy_inode() is non-NULL, it gets called + * if ->free_inode() is non-NULL, it gets scheduled by call_rcu() + * combination of NULL ->destroy_inode and NULL ->free_inode is + treated as NULL/free_inode_nonrcu, to preserve the compatibility. + + Note that the callback (be it via ->free_inode() or explicit call_rcu() + in ->destroy_inode()) is *NOT* ordered wrt superblock destruction; + as the matter of fact, the superblock and all associated structures + might be already gone. The filesystem driver is guaranteed to be still + there, but that's it. Freeing memory in the callback is fine; doing + more than that is possible, but requires a lot of care and is best + avoided. |