diff options
| author | Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> | 2025-11-26 16:03:52 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2025-12-14 11:54:46 +0300 |
| commit | fb7bfa31b8e8569f154f2fe0ea6c2f03c0f087aa (patch) | |
| tree | c16e220ba4a95d4b7df12fdbea21897b52c0c05d | |
| parent | 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8 (diff) | |
| download | linux-fb7bfa31b8e8569f154f2fe0ea6c2f03c0f087aa.tar.xz | |
x86/cpu/amd: Correct the microcode table for Zenbleed
The good revisions are tied to exact steppings, meaning it's not valid to
match on model number alone, let alone a range.
This is probably only a latent issue. From public microcode archives, the
following CPUs exist 17-30-00, 17-60-00, 17-70-00 and would be captured by the
model ranges. They're likely pre-production steppings, and likely didn't get
Zenbleed microcode, but it's still incorrect to compare them to a different
steppings revision.
Either way, convert the logic to use x86_match_min_microcode_rev(), which is
the preferred mechanism.
Fixes: 522b1d69219d ("x86/cpu/amd: Add a Zenbleed fix")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251126130352.880424-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index bc94ff1e250a..86059f2c0fcd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -951,26 +951,14 @@ static void init_amd_zen1(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) } } -static bool cpu_has_zenbleed_microcode(void) -{ - u32 good_rev = 0; - - switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) { - case 0x30 ... 0x3f: good_rev = 0x0830107b; break; - case 0x60 ... 0x67: good_rev = 0x0860010c; break; - case 0x68 ... 0x6f: good_rev = 0x08608107; break; - case 0x70 ... 0x7f: good_rev = 0x08701033; break; - case 0xa0 ... 0xaf: good_rev = 0x08a00009; break; - - default: - return false; - } - - if (boot_cpu_data.microcode < good_rev) - return false; - - return true; -} +static const struct x86_cpu_id amd_zenbleed_microcode[] = { + ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x31, 0x0, 0x0830107b), + ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x60, 0x1, 0x0860010c), + ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x68, 0x1, 0x08608107), + ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x71, 0x0, 0x08701033), + ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0xa0, 0x0, 0x08a00009), + {} +}; static void zen2_zenbleed_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { @@ -980,7 +968,7 @@ static void zen2_zenbleed_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_AVX)) return; - if (!cpu_has_zenbleed_microcode()) { + if (!x86_match_min_microcode_rev(amd_zenbleed_microcode)) { pr_notice_once("Zenbleed: please update your microcode for the most optimal fix\n"); msr_set_bit(MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG, MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG_ZEN2_FP_BACKUP_FIX_BIT); } else { |
