diff options
| author | Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> | 2025-10-21 21:30:43 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> | 2025-10-22 11:04:39 +0300 |
| commit | f477af0cfa0487eddec66ffe10fd9df628ba6f52 (patch) | |
| tree | e6fefcdf7cc4e7a2909c1e75d6a5ea481c24e875 | |
| parent | 3e7ec343f066cb3b6916239680ab6ad44537b453 (diff) | |
| download | linux-f477af0cfa0487eddec66ffe10fd9df628ba6f52.tar.xz | |
xfs: fix locking in xchk_nlinks_collect_dir
On a filesystem with parent pointers, xchk_nlinks_collect_dir walks both
the directory entries (data fork) and the parent pointers (attr fork) to
determine the correct link count. Unfortunately I forgot to update the
lock mode logic to handle the case of a directory whose attr fork is in
btree format and has not yet been loaded *and* whose data fork doesn't
need loading.
This leads to a bunch of assertions from xfs/286 in xfs_iread_extents
because we only took ILOCK_SHARED, not ILOCK_EXCL. You'd need the rare
happenstance of a directory with a large number of non-pptr extended
attributes set and enough memory pressure to cause the directory to be
evicted and partially reloaded from disk.
I /think/ this only started in 6.18-rc1 because I've started seeing OOM
errors with the maple tree slab using 70% of memory, and this didn't
happen in 6.17. Yay dynamic systems!
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.10
Fixes: 77ede5f44b0d86 ("xfs: walk directory parent pointers to determine backref count")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/scrub/nlinks.c | 34 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/nlinks.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/nlinks.c index 26721fab5cab..091c79e432e5 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/nlinks.c +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/nlinks.c @@ -376,6 +376,36 @@ out_incomplete: return error; } +static uint +xchk_nlinks_ilock_dir( + struct xfs_inode *ip) +{ + uint lock_mode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED; + + /* + * We're going to scan the directory entries, so we must be ready to + * pull the data fork mappings into memory if they aren't already. + */ + if (xfs_need_iread_extents(&ip->i_df)) + lock_mode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL; + + /* + * We're going to scan the parent pointers, so we must be ready to + * pull the attr fork mappings into memory if they aren't already. + */ + if (xfs_has_parent(ip->i_mount) && xfs_inode_has_attr_fork(ip) && + xfs_need_iread_extents(&ip->i_af)) + lock_mode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL; + + /* + * Take the IOLOCK so that other threads cannot start a directory + * update while we're scanning. + */ + lock_mode |= XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED; + xfs_ilock(ip, lock_mode); + return lock_mode; +} + /* Walk a directory to bump the observed link counts of the children. */ STATIC int xchk_nlinks_collect_dir( @@ -394,8 +424,7 @@ xchk_nlinks_collect_dir( return 0; /* Prevent anyone from changing this directory while we walk it. */ - xfs_ilock(dp, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED); - lock_mode = xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(dp); + lock_mode = xchk_nlinks_ilock_dir(dp); /* * The dotdot entry of an unlinked directory still points to the last @@ -452,7 +481,6 @@ out_abort: xchk_iscan_abort(&xnc->collect_iscan); out_unlock: xfs_iunlock(dp, lock_mode); - xfs_iunlock(dp, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED); return error; } |
