diff options
| author | Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> | 2017-04-08 20:09:59 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | 2017-04-26 00:25:56 +0300 |
| commit | e56efe9322c5bec9ad4f301c8102fcd630694b4c (patch) | |
| tree | 637506d4743c9808db8612d962fdaf7e9c19ac14 | |
| parent | dadf3e435debb85dfcf28c157012047153a21a97 (diff) | |
| download | linux-e56efe9322c5bec9ad4f301c8102fcd630694b4c.tar.xz | |
lockd: remove redundant check on block
A null check followed by a return is being performed already, so block
is always non-null at the second check on block, hence we can remove
this redundant null-check (Detected by PVS-Studio). Also re-work
comment to clean up a check-patch warning.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/lockd/svclock.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index 5581e020644b..3507c80d1d4b 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c @@ -870,15 +870,15 @@ nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct nlm_cookie *cookie, __be32 status) if (!(block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie))) return; - if (block) { - if (status == nlm_lck_denied_grace_period) { - /* Try again in a couple of seconds */ - nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ); - } else { - /* Lock is now held by client, or has been rejected. - * In both cases, the block should be removed. */ - nlmsvc_unlink_block(block); - } + if (status == nlm_lck_denied_grace_period) { + /* Try again in a couple of seconds */ + nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ); + } else { + /* + * Lock is now held by client, or has been rejected. + * In both cases, the block should be removed. + */ + nlmsvc_unlink_block(block); } nlmsvc_release_block(block); } |