diff options
author | Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> | 2024-12-31 03:48:08 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> | 2025-01-12 04:09:11 +0300 |
commit | e47f0a5898540eb19b953708707887d4b3020645 (patch) | |
tree | 3d4169fa8fe5c16aeb0335dd7e0af26649a6bbb7 | |
parent | f69ccbc50a12417c74ddf891d3958ddf609f171c (diff) | |
download | linux-e47f0a5898540eb19b953708707887d4b3020645.tar.xz |
wifi: rtw89: fix proceeding MCC with wrong scanning state after sequence changes
When starting/proceeding MCC, it will abort an ongoing hw scan process.
In the proceeding cases, it unexpectedly tries to abort a non-exist hw
scan process. Then, a trace shown at the bottom will happen. This problem
is caused by a previous commit which changed some call sequence inside
rtw89_hw_scan_complete() to fix some coex problems. These changes lead
to our scanning flag was not cleared when proceeding MCC. To keep the
fixes on coex, and resolve the problem here, re-consider the related
call sequence.
The known sequence requirements are listed below.
* the old sequence:
A. notify coex
B. clear scanning flag
C. proceed chanctx
C-1. set channel
C-2. proceed MCC
(the problem: A needs to be after C-1)
* the current sequence:
C. proceed chanctx
C-1. set channel
C-2. proceed MCC
A. notify coex
B. clear scanning flag
(the problem: C-2 needs to be after B)
So, now let hw scan caller pass a callback to proceed chanctx if needed.
Then, the new sequence will be like the below.
C-1. set channel
A. notify coex
B. clear scanning flag
C-2. proceed MCC
The following is the kernel log for the problem in current sequence.
rtw89_8852be 0000:04:00.0: rtw89_hw_scan_offload failed ret -110
------------[ cut here ]------------
[...]
CPU: 2 PID: 3991 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Tainted: G OE 6.6.17 #3
Hardware name: LENOVO 2356AD1/2356AD1, BIOS G7ETB3WW (2.73 ) 11/28/2018
Workqueue: events_unbound wiphy_work_cancel [cfg80211]
RIP: 0010:ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
Code: 9c 24 d0 11 00 00 49 39 dd 0f 85 46 ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 09 2d
RSP: 0018:ffffb27783643d48 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff8a2280964bc0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8a23df580900
RBP: ffffb27783643d88 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000400
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000008268 R12: ffff8a23df580900
R13: ffff8a23df581b00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a258e680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f26a0654000 CR3: 000000002ea2e002 CR4: 00000000001706e0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? show_regs+0x68/0x70
? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
? __warn+0x8f/0x150
? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
? report_bug+0x1f5/0x200
? handle_bug+0x46/0x80
? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211]
ieee80211_scan_work+0x14a/0x650 [mac80211]
? __queue_work+0x10f/0x410
wiphy_work_cancel+0x2fb/0x310 [cfg80211]
process_scheduled_works+0x9d/0x390
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
worker_thread+0x15b/0x2d0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x108/0x140
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: f16c40acd319 ("wifi: rtw89: Fix TX fail with A2DP after scanning")
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241231004811.8646-2-pkshih@realtek.com
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c | 26 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.h | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 40 |
4 files changed, 66 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c index fb9449930c40..abc78716596d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c @@ -2530,7 +2530,25 @@ void rtw89_chanctx_pause(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, hal->entity_pause = true; } -void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) +static void rtw89_chanctx_proceed_cb(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm *parm) +{ + int ret; + + if (!parm || !parm->cb) + return; + + ret = parm->cb(rtwdev, parm->data); + if (ret) + rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "%s (%s): cb failed: %d\n", __func__, + parm->caller ?: "unknown", ret); +} + +/* pass @cb_parm if there is a @cb_parm->cb which needs to invoke right after + * call rtw89_set_channel() and right before proceed entity according to mode. + */ +void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm *cb_parm) { struct rtw89_hal *hal = &rtwdev->hal; enum rtw89_entity_mode mode; @@ -2538,14 +2556,18 @@ void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) lockdep_assert_held(&rtwdev->mutex); - if (!hal->entity_pause) + if (unlikely(!hal->entity_pause)) { + rtw89_chanctx_proceed_cb(rtwdev, cb_parm); return; + } rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_CHAN, "chanctx proceed\n"); hal->entity_pause = false; rtw89_set_channel(rtwdev); + rtw89_chanctx_proceed_cb(rtwdev, cb_parm); + mode = rtw89_get_entity_mode(rtwdev); switch (mode) { case RTW89_ENTITY_MODE_MCC: diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.h index 2eb31dff2083..092a6f676894 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.h @@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ enum rtw89_chanctx_pause_reasons { RTW89_CHANCTX_PAUSE_REASON_ROC, }; +struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm { + int (*cb)(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, void *data); + void *data; + const char *caller; +}; + struct rtw89_entity_weight { unsigned int active_chanctxs; unsigned int active_roles; @@ -100,7 +106,8 @@ void rtw89_queue_chanctx_change(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, void rtw89_chanctx_track(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev); void rtw89_chanctx_pause(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_chanctx_pause_reasons rsn); -void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev); +void rtw89_chanctx_proceed(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm *cb_parm); const struct rtw89_chan *__rtw89_mgnt_chan_get(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const char *caller_message, diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c index f848185e2ced..bb4621d38658 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ void rtw89_roc_end(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif) roc->state = RTW89_ROC_IDLE; rtw89_config_roc_chandef(rtwdev, rtwvif_link->chanctx_idx, NULL); - rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev); + rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev, NULL); ret = rtw89_core_send_nullfunc(rtwdev, rtwvif_link, true, false); if (ret) rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_TXRX, diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c index 90db15685728..6c105e4b1cb3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c @@ -6919,22 +6919,25 @@ void rtw89_hw_scan_start(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, rtw89_chanctx_pause(rtwdev, RTW89_CHANCTX_PAUSE_REASON_HW_SCAN); } -void rtw89_hw_scan_complete(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, - struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link, - bool aborted) +struct rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb_data { + struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link; + bool aborted; +}; + +static int rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, void *data) { const struct rtw89_mac_gen_def *mac = rtwdev->chip->mac_def; struct rtw89_hw_scan_info *scan_info = &rtwdev->scan_info; + struct rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb_data *cb_data = data; + struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link = cb_data->rtwvif_link; struct cfg80211_scan_info info = { - .aborted = aborted, + .aborted = cb_data->aborted, }; struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif; u32 reg; if (!rtwvif_link) - return; - - rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev); + return -EINVAL; rtwvif = rtwvif_link->rtwvif; @@ -6953,6 +6956,29 @@ void rtw89_hw_scan_complete(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, scan_info->last_chan_idx = 0; scan_info->scanning_vif = NULL; scan_info->abort = false; + + return 0; +} + +void rtw89_hw_scan_complete(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, + struct rtw89_vif_link *rtwvif_link, + bool aborted) +{ + struct rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb_data cb_data = { + .rtwvif_link = rtwvif_link, + .aborted = aborted, + }; + const struct rtw89_chanctx_cb_parm cb_parm = { + .cb = rtw89_hw_scan_complete_cb, + .data = &cb_data, + .caller = __func__, + }; + + /* The things here needs to be done after setting channel (for coex) + * and before proceeding entity mode (for MCC). So, pass a callback + * of them for the right sequence rather than doing them directly. + */ + rtw89_chanctx_proceed(rtwdev, &cb_parm); } void rtw89_hw_scan_abort(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, |