summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>2026-02-18 03:54:38 +0300
committerSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>2026-03-02 20:53:50 +0300
commitd0ad1b05bbe6f8da159a4dfb6692b3b7ce30ccc8 (patch)
tree55f1d23fd1322285a5bd863ade9ce85365ebbb75
parent5c247d08bc81bbad4c662dcf5654137a2f8483ec (diff)
downloadlinux-d0ad1b05bbe6f8da159a4dfb6692b3b7ce30ccc8.tar.xz
KVM: x86: Defer non-architectural deliver of exception payload to userspace read
When attempting to play nice with userspace that hasn't enabled KVM_CAP_EXCEPTION_PAYLOAD, defer KVM's non-architectural delivery of the payload until userspace actually reads relevant vCPU state, and more importantly, force delivery of the payload in *all* paths where userspace saves relevant vCPU state, not just KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS. Ignoring userspace save/restore for the moment, delivering the payload before the exception is injected is wrong regardless of whether L1 or L2 is running. To make matters even more confusing, the flaw *currently* being papered over by the !is_guest_mode() check isn't even the same bug that commit da998b46d244 ("kvm: x86: Defer setting of CR2 until #PF delivery") was trying to avoid. At the time of commit da998b46d244, KVM didn't correctly handle exception intercepts, as KVM would wait until VM-Entry into L2 was imminent to check if the queued exception should morph to a nested VM-Exit. I.e. KVM would deliver the payload to L2 and then synthesize a VM-Exit into L1. But the payload was only the most blatant issue, e.g. waiting to check exception intercepts would also lead to KVM incorrectly escalating a should-be-intercepted #PF into a #DF. That underlying bug was eventually fixed by commit 7709aba8f716 ("KVM: x86: Morph pending exceptions to pending VM-Exits at queue time"), but in the interim, commit a06230b62b89 ("KVM: x86: Deliver exception payload on KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS") came along and subtly added another dependency on the !is_guest_mode() check. While not recorded in the changelog, the motivation for deferring the !exception_payload_enabled delivery was to fix a flaw where a synthesized MTF (Monitor Trap Flag) VM-Exit would drop a pending #DB and clobber DR6. On a VM-Exit, VMX CPUs save pending #DB information into the VMCS, which is emulated by KVM in nested_vmx_update_pending_dbg() by grabbing the payload from the queue/pending exception. I.e. prematurely delivering the payload would cause the pending #DB to not be recorded in the VMCS, and of course, clobber L2's DR6 as seen by L1. Jumping back to save+restore, the quirked behavior of forcing delivery of the payload only works if userspace does KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS *before* CR2 or DR6 is saved, i.e. before KVM_GET_SREGS{,2} and KVM_GET_DEBUGREGS. E.g. if userspace does KVM_GET_SREGS before KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS, then the CR2 saved by userspace won't contain the payload for the exception save by KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS. Deliberately deliver the payload in the store_regs() path, as it's the least awful option even though userspace may not be doing save+restore. Because if userspace _is_ doing save restore, it could elide KVM_GET_SREGS knowing that SREGS were already saved when the vCPU exited. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200207103608.110305-1-oupton@google.com Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> Tested-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260218005438.2619063-1-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kvm/x86.c62
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a03530795707..6e87ec52fa06 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -864,9 +864,6 @@ static void kvm_multiple_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int nr,
vcpu->arch.exception.error_code = error_code;
vcpu->arch.exception.has_payload = has_payload;
vcpu->arch.exception.payload = payload;
- if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))
- kvm_deliver_exception_payload(vcpu,
- &vcpu->arch.exception);
return;
}
@@ -5531,18 +5528,8 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return 0;
}
-static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
+static struct kvm_queued_exception *kvm_get_exception_to_save(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_queued_exception *ex;
-
- process_nmi(vcpu);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_SMM
- if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu))
- process_smi(vcpu);
-#endif
-
/*
* KVM's ABI only allows for one exception to be migrated. Luckily,
* the only time there can be two queued exceptions is if there's a
@@ -5553,21 +5540,46 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (vcpu->arch.exception_vmexit.pending &&
!vcpu->arch.exception.pending &&
!vcpu->arch.exception.injected)
- ex = &vcpu->arch.exception_vmexit;
- else
- ex = &vcpu->arch.exception;
+ return &vcpu->arch.exception_vmexit;
+
+ return &vcpu->arch.exception;
+}
+
+static void kvm_handle_exception_payload_quirk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_queued_exception *ex = kvm_get_exception_to_save(vcpu);
/*
- * In guest mode, payload delivery should be deferred if the exception
- * will be intercepted by L1, e.g. KVM should not modifying CR2 if L1
- * intercepts #PF, ditto for DR6 and #DBs. If the per-VM capability,
- * KVM_CAP_EXCEPTION_PAYLOAD, is not set, userspace may or may not
- * propagate the payload and so it cannot be safely deferred. Deliver
- * the payload if the capability hasn't been requested.
+ * If KVM_CAP_EXCEPTION_PAYLOAD is disabled, then (prematurely) deliver
+ * the pending exception payload when userspace saves *any* vCPU state
+ * that interacts with exception payloads to avoid breaking userspace.
+ *
+ * Architecturally, KVM must not deliver an exception payload until the
+ * exception is actually injected, e.g. to avoid losing pending #DB
+ * information (which VMX tracks in the VMCS), and to avoid clobbering
+ * state if the exception is never injected for whatever reason. But
+ * if KVM_CAP_EXCEPTION_PAYLOAD isn't enabled, then userspace may or
+ * may not propagate the payload across save+restore, and so KVM can't
+ * safely defer delivery of the payload.
*/
if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.exception_payload_enabled &&
ex->pending && ex->has_payload)
kvm_deliver_exception_payload(vcpu, ex);
+}
+
+static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
+{
+ struct kvm_queued_exception *ex = kvm_get_exception_to_save(vcpu);
+
+ process_nmi(vcpu);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_SMM
+ if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu))
+ process_smi(vcpu);
+#endif
+
+ kvm_handle_exception_payload_quirk(vcpu);
memset(events, 0, sizeof(*events));
@@ -5746,6 +5758,8 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_debugregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
return -EINVAL;
+ kvm_handle_exception_payload_quirk(vcpu);
+
memset(dbgregs, 0, sizeof(*dbgregs));
BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu->arch.db) != ARRAY_SIZE(dbgregs->db));
@@ -12136,6 +12150,8 @@ static void __get_sregs_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
goto skip_protected_regs;
+ kvm_handle_exception_payload_quirk(vcpu);
+
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &sregs->cs, VCPU_SREG_CS);
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &sregs->ds, VCPU_SREG_DS);
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &sregs->es, VCPU_SREG_ES);