diff options
| author | Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@ew.tq-group.com> | 2025-10-01 12:10:03 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> | 2025-11-12 21:30:07 +0300 |
| commit | c902835fc6eb7e13dbffc404210eed59293425c8 (patch) | |
| tree | 79632477b2b6a3b78c44e1f83d5db9b163a714f7 | |
| parent | f5982a679a16a673a0fc374c1d9d77111cd86740 (diff) | |
| download | linux-c902835fc6eb7e13dbffc404210eed59293425c8.tar.xz | |
can: mcp251xfd: add workaround for errata 5
According to Errata DS80000789E 5 writing IOCON register using one SPI
write command clears LAT0/LAT1.
Errata Fix/Work Around suggests to write registers with single byte write
instructions. However, it seems that every write to the second byte
causes the overwrite of LAT0/LAT1.
Never write byte 2 of IOCON register to avoid clearing of LAT0/LAT1.
Signed-off-by: Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@ew.tq-group.com>
Tested-by: Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251001091006.4003841-4-viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com
[mkl: add missing MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK]
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c | 89 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h | 1 |
2 files changed, 84 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c index e61cbd209955..70d5ff0ae7ac 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ static const struct regmap_config mcp251xfd_regmap_crc; static int -mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, - const void *reg, size_t reg_len, - const void *val, size_t val_len) +_mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) { struct spi_device *spi = context; struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi); @@ -40,6 +40,45 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, } static int +mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) +{ + const u16 byte_exclude = MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON + + mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK); + u16 reg = be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)reg_p) & MCP251XFD_SPI_ADDRESS_MASK; + int ret; + + /* Never write to bits 16..23 of IOCON register to avoid clearing of LAT0/LAT1 + * + * According to MCP2518FD Errata DS80000789E 5 writing IOCON register using one + * SPI write command clears LAT0/LAT1. + * + * Errata Fix/Work Around suggests to write registers with single byte + * write instructions. However, it seems that the byte at 0xe06(IOCON[23:16]) + * is for read-only access and writing to it causes the clearing of LAT0/LAT1. + */ + if (reg <= byte_exclude && reg + val_len > byte_exclude) { + size_t len = byte_exclude - reg; + + /* Write up to 0xe05 */ + ret = _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len, val, len); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* Write from 0xe07 on */ + reg += len + 1; + reg = (__force unsigned short)cpu_to_be16(MCP251XFD_SPI_INSTRUCTION_WRITE | reg); + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, ®, reg_len, + val + len + 1, + val_len - len - 1); + } + + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len, + val, val_len); +} + +static int mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count) { const size_t data_offset = sizeof(__be16); @@ -197,9 +236,9 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_nocrc_read(void *context, } static int -mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, - const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, - const void *val, size_t val_len) +_mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) { struct spi_device *spi = context; struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi); @@ -231,6 +270,44 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, } static int +mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(void *context, + const void *reg_p, size_t reg_len, + const void *val, size_t val_len) +{ + const u16 byte_exclude = MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON + + mcp251xfd_first_byte_set(MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK); + u16 reg = *(u16 *)reg_p; + int ret; + + /* Never write to bits 16..23 of IOCON register to avoid clearing of LAT0/LAT1 + * + * According to MCP2518FD Errata DS80000789E 5 writing IOCON register using one + * SPI write command clears LAT0/LAT1. + * + * Errata Fix/Work Around suggests to write registers with single byte + * write instructions. However, it seems that the byte at 0xe06(IOCON[23:16]) + * is for read-only access and writing to it causes the clearing of LAT0/LAT1. + */ + if (reg <= byte_exclude && reg + val_len > byte_exclude) { + size_t len = byte_exclude - reg; + + /* Write up to 0xe05 */ + ret = _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, ®, reg_len, val, len); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* Write from 0xe07 on */ + reg += len + 1; + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, ®, reg_len, + val + len + 1, + val_len - len - 1); + } + + return _mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_gather_write(context, reg_p, reg_len, + val, val_len); +} + +static int mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count) { diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h index dcbbd2b2fae8..e63034fd5947 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h +++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ #define MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_PM0 BIT(24) #define MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO1 BIT(17) #define MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO0 BIT(16) +#define MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_GPIO_MASK GENMASK(17, 16) #define MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_LAT1 BIT(9) #define MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_LAT0 BIT(8) #define MCP251XFD_REG_IOCON_XSTBYEN BIT(6) |
