summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2026-04-06 20:53:34 +0300
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2026-04-09 05:03:00 +0300
commitbd5c24e4001d39136e1084fc47335c93e4ebbb0d (patch)
tree6a8d6cb1946eaac0d1602e024a13bc98b9090149
parent1795654f000568d36ff170a17f5b56df3503ada5 (diff)
downloadlinux-bd5c24e4001d39136e1084fc47335c93e4ebbb0d.tar.xz
docs: netdev: improve wording of reviewer guidance
Reword the reviewer guidance based on behavior we see on the list. Steer folks: - towards sending tags - away from process issues. Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to> Reviewed-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260406175334.3153451-1-kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst8
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
index 3aa13bc2405d..bda93b459a05 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
@@ -551,10 +551,12 @@ helpful tips please see :ref:`development_advancedtopics_reviews`.
It's safe to assume that netdev maintainers know the community and the level
of expertise of the reviewers. The reviewers should not be concerned about
-their comments impeding or derailing the patch flow.
+their comments impeding or derailing the patch flow. A Reviewed-by tag
+is understood to mean "I have reviewed this code to the best of my ability"
+rather than "I can attest this code is correct".
-Less experienced reviewers are highly encouraged to do more in-depth
-review of submissions and not focus exclusively on trivial or subjective
+Reviewers are highly encouraged to do more in-depth review of submissions
+and not focus exclusively on process issues, trivial or subjective
matters like code formatting, tags etc.
Testimonials / feedback