diff options
| author | Melbin K Mathew <mlbnkm1@gmail.com> | 2026-01-21 12:36:27 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> | 2026-01-22 17:41:33 +0300 |
| commit | 8ee784fdf006cbe8739cfa093f54d326cbf54037 (patch) | |
| tree | a3ee154a8f9933f9689756ee486e0eac559c8a3f | |
| parent | 0a98de80136968bab7db37b16282b37f044694d3 (diff) | |
| download | linux-8ee784fdf006cbe8739cfa093f54d326cbf54037.tar.xz | |
vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size
The virtio transports derives its TX credit directly from peer_buf_alloc,
which is set from the remote endpoint's SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE value.
On the host side this means that the amount of data we are willing to
queue for a connection is scaled by a guest-chosen buffer size, rather
than the host's own vsock configuration. A malicious guest can advertise
a large buffer and read slowly, causing the host to allocate a
correspondingly large amount of sk_buff memory.
The same thing would happen in the guest with a malicious host, since
virtio transports share the same code base.
Introduce a small helper, virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(), that
returns min(peer_buf_alloc, buf_alloc), and use it wherever we consume
peer_buf_alloc.
This ensures the effective TX window is bounded by both the peer's
advertised buffer and our own buf_alloc (already clamped to
buffer_max_size via SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE), so a remote peer
cannot force the other to queue more data than allowed by its own
vsock settings.
On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with
32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly
drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB; the system only
recovered after killing the QEMU process. That said, if QEMU memory is
limited with cgroups, the maximum memory used will be limited.
With this patch applied:
Before:
MemFree: ~61.6 GiB
Slab: ~142 MiB
SUnreclaim: ~117 MiB
After 32 high-credit connections:
MemFree: ~61.5 GiB
Slab: ~178 MiB
SUnreclaim: ~152 MiB
Only ~35 MiB increase in Slab/SUnreclaim, no host OOM, and the guest
remains responsive.
Compatibility with non-virtio transports:
- VMCI uses the AF_VSOCK buffer knobs to size its queue pairs per
socket based on the local vsk->buffer_* values; the remote side
cannot enlarge those queues beyond what the local endpoint
configured.
- Hyper-V's vsock transport uses fixed-size VMBus ring buffers and
an MTU bound; there is no peer-controlled credit field comparable
to peer_buf_alloc, and the remote endpoint cannot drive in-flight
kernel memory above those ring sizes.
- The loopback path reuses virtio_transport_common.c, so it
naturally follows the same semantics as the virtio transport.
This change is limited to virtio_transport_common.c and thus affects
virtio-vsock, vhost-vsock, and loopback, bringing them in line with the
"remote window intersected with local policy" behaviour that VMCI and
Hyper-V already effectively have.
Fixes: 06a8fc78367d ("VSOCK: Introduce virtio_vsock_common.ko")
Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Melbin K Mathew <mlbnkm1@gmail.com>
[Stefano: small adjustments after changing the previous patch]
[Stefano: tweak the commit message]
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260121093628.9941-4-sgarzare@redhat.com
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c index 6175124d63d3..d3e26025ef58 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c @@ -821,6 +821,15 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue); +static u32 virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs) +{ + /* The peer advertises its receive buffer via peer_buf_alloc, but we + * cap it to our local buf_alloc so a remote peer cannot force us to + * queue more data than our own buffer configuration allows. + */ + return min(vvs->peer_buf_alloc, vvs->buf_alloc); +} + int virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg, @@ -830,7 +839,7 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock); - if (len > vvs->peer_buf_alloc) { + if (len > virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(vvs)) { spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock); return -EMSGSIZE; } @@ -884,7 +893,8 @@ static s64 virtio_transport_has_space(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs) * we have bytes in flight (tx_cnt - peer_fwd_cnt), the subtraction * does not underflow. */ - bytes = (s64)vvs->peer_buf_alloc - (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt); + bytes = (s64)virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(vvs) - + (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt); if (bytes < 0) bytes = 0; |
