Merge tag 'perf-urgent-2025-02-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull perf event fixes from Ingo Molnar:
 "Miscellaneous perf events fixes and a minor HW enablement change:

   - Fix missing RCU protection in perf_iterate_ctx()

   - Fix pmu_ctx_list ordering bug

   - Reject the zero page in uprobes

   - Fix a family of bugs related to low frequency sampling

   - Add Intel Arrow Lake U CPUs to the generic Arrow Lake RAPL support
     table

   - Fix a lockdep-assert false positive in uretprobes"

* tag 'perf-urgent-2025-02-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  uprobes: Remove too strict lockdep_assert() condition in hprobe_expire()
  perf/x86/rapl: Add support for Intel Arrow Lake U
  perf/x86/intel: Use better start period for frequency mode
  perf/core: Fix low freq setting via IOC_PERIOD
  perf/x86: Fix low freqency setting issue
  uprobes: Reject the shared zeropage in uprobe_write_opcode()
  perf/core: Order the PMU list to fix warning about unordered pmu_ctx_list
  perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()

5 files changed, 119 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 8f218ac0d445..2092d615333d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type == event->pmu->type)
 		event->hw.config |= x86_pmu_get_event_config(event);
 
-	if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+	if (!event->attr.freq && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
 		s64 left = event->attr.sample_period;
 		x86_pmu.limit_period(event, &left);
 		if (left > event->attr.sample_period)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index cdcebf30468a..cdb19e3ba3aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3952,6 +3952,85 @@ static inline bool intel_pmu_has_cap(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
 	return test_bit(idx, (unsigned long *)&intel_cap->capabilities);
 }
 
+static u64 intel_pmu_freq_start_period(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	int type = event->attr.type;
+	u64 config, factor;
+	s64 start;
+
+	/*
+	 * The 127 is the lowest possible recommended SAV (sample after value)
+	 * for a 4000 freq (default freq), according to the event list JSON file.
+	 * Also, assume the workload is idle 50% time.
+	 */
+	factor = 64 * 4000;
+	if (type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE && type != PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE)
+		goto end;
+
+	/*
+	 * The estimation of the start period in the freq mode is
+	 * based on the below assumption.
+	 *
+	 * For a cycles or an instructions event, 1GHZ of the
+	 * underlying platform, 1 IPC. The workload is idle 50% time.
+	 * The start period = 1,000,000,000 * 1 / freq / 2.
+	 *		    = 500,000,000 / freq
+	 *
+	 * Usually, the branch-related events occur less than the
+	 * instructions event. According to the Intel event list JSON
+	 * file, the SAV (sample after value) of a branch-related event
+	 * is usually 1/4 of an instruction event.
+	 * The start period of branch-related events = 125,000,000 / freq.
+	 *
+	 * The cache-related events occurs even less. The SAV is usually
+	 * 1/20 of an instruction event.
+	 * The start period of cache-related events = 25,000,000 / freq.
+	 */
+	config = event->attr.config & PERF_HW_EVENT_MASK;
+	if (type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) {
+		switch (config) {
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES:
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS:
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_BUS_CYCLES:
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND:
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND:
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES:
+			factor = 500000000;
+			break;
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS:
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES:
+			factor = 125000000;
+			break;
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES:
+		case PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES:
+			factor = 25000000;
+			break;
+		default:
+			goto end;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE)
+		factor = 25000000;
+end:
+	/*
+	 * Usually, a prime or a number with less factors (close to prime)
+	 * is chosen as an SAV, which makes it less likely that the sampling
+	 * period synchronizes with some periodic event in the workload.
+	 * Minus 1 to make it at least avoiding values near power of twos
+	 * for the default freq.
+	 */
+	start = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(factor, event->attr.sample_freq) - 1;
+
+	if (start > x86_pmu.max_period)
+		start = x86_pmu.max_period;
+
+	if (x86_pmu.limit_period)
+		x86_pmu.limit_period(event, &start);
+
+	return start;
+}
+
 static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	int ret = x86_pmu_hw_config(event);
@@ -3963,6 +4042,12 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (event->attr.freq && event->attr.sample_freq) {
+		event->hw.sample_period = intel_pmu_freq_start_period(event);
+		event->hw.last_period = event->hw.sample_period;
+		local64_set(&event->hw.period_left, event->hw.sample_period);
+	}
+
 	if (event->attr.precise_ip) {
 		if ((event->attr.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) == INTEL_FIXED_VLBR_EVENT)
 			return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index 4952faf03e82..6941f4811bec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -879,6 +879,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_model_match[] __initconst = {
 	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_METEORLAKE_L,	&model_skl),
 	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ARROWLAKE_H,	&model_skl),
 	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ARROWLAKE,		&model_skl),
+	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ARROWLAKE_U,	&model_skl),
 	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_LUNARLAKE_M,	&model_skl),
 	{},
 };
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index bcb09e011e9e..6364319e2f88 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4950,7 +4950,7 @@ static struct perf_event_pmu_context *
 find_get_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 		     struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	struct perf_event_pmu_context *new = NULL, *epc;
+	struct perf_event_pmu_context *new = NULL, *pos = NULL, *epc;
 	void *task_ctx_data = NULL;
 
 	if (!ctx->task) {
@@ -5007,12 +5007,19 @@ find_get_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 			atomic_inc(&epc->refcount);
 			goto found_epc;
 		}
+		/* Make sure the pmu_ctx_list is sorted by PMU type: */
+		if (!pos && epc->pmu->type > pmu->type)
+			pos = epc;
 	}
 
 	epc = new;
 	new = NULL;
 
-	list_add(&epc->pmu_ctx_entry, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list);
+	if (!pos)
+		list_add_tail(&epc->pmu_ctx_entry, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list);
+	else
+		list_add(&epc->pmu_ctx_entry, pos->pmu_ctx_entry.prev);
+
 	epc->ctx = ctx;
 
 found_epc:
@@ -5962,14 +5969,15 @@ static int _perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
 	if (!value)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (event->attr.freq && value > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (perf_event_check_period(event, value))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (!event->attr.freq && (value & (1ULL << 63)))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (event->attr.freq) {
+		if (value > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		if (perf_event_check_period(event, value))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		if (value & (1ULL << 63))
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	event_function_call(event, __perf_event_period, &value);
 
@@ -8321,7 +8329,8 @@ void perf_event_exec(void)
 
 	perf_event_enable_on_exec(ctx);
 	perf_event_remove_on_exec(ctx);
-	perf_iterate_ctx(ctx, perf_event_addr_filters_exec, NULL, true);
+	scoped_guard(rcu)
+		perf_iterate_ctx(ctx, perf_event_addr_filters_exec, NULL, true);
 
 	perf_unpin_context(ctx);
 	put_ctx(ctx);
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index bf2a87a0a378..b4ca8898fe17 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -495,6 +495,11 @@ retry:
 	if (ret <= 0)
 		goto put_old;
 
+	if (is_zero_page(old_page)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto put_old;
+	}
+
 	if (WARN(!is_register && PageCompound(old_page),
 		 "uprobe unregister should never work on compound page\n")) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -762,10 +767,14 @@ static struct uprobe *hprobe_expire(struct hprobe *hprobe, bool get)
 	enum hprobe_state hstate;
 
 	/*
-	 * return_instance's hprobe is protected by RCU.
-	 * Underlying uprobe is itself protected from reuse by SRCU.
+	 * Caller should guarantee that return_instance is not going to be
+	 * freed from under us. This can be achieved either through holding
+	 * rcu_read_lock() or by owning return_instance in the first place.
+	 *
+	 * Underlying uprobe is itself protected from reuse by SRCU, so ensure
+	 * SRCU lock is held properly.
 	 */
-	lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() && srcu_read_lock_held(&uretprobes_srcu));
+	lockdep_assert(srcu_read_lock_held(&uretprobes_srcu));
 
 	hstate = READ_ONCE(hprobe->state);
 	switch (hstate) {