diff options
| author | Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> | 2026-05-22 07:19:10 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2026-05-22 19:41:24 +0300 |
| commit | 3494dff89779b73a6c70481c982e0e96d336454a (patch) | |
| tree | dc7e3251be14a8e81e05d7ed4cd36e75daa79afc | |
| parent | 9801be8bef65dbcbc40c1a9c2f03d70ed67a5d30 (diff) | |
| download | linux-3494dff89779b73a6c70481c982e0e96d336454a.tar.xz | |
cpufreq: conservative: Simplify frequency limit handling
cs_dbs_update() performs explicit checks against policy->min/max
before updating the target frequency. These checks are redundant as
__cpufreq_driver_target() already clamps the requested frequency to
the valid policy limits.
Remove the unnecessary boundary checks and simplify the update logic.
This also fixes an issue introduced by commit 00bfe05889e9 ("cpufreq:
conservative: Decrease frequency faster for deferred updates"), where
stale target comparisons could cause frequency updates to be skipped
entirely after deferred adjustments.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260421123545.1745998-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com/
Fixes: 00bfe05889e9 ("cpufreq: conservative: Decrease frequency faster for deferred updates")
Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/292e6d937890f135e30ec0d2107eaad47cb9a976.1779423281.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c index df01d33993d8..0b32ae28ec85 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c @@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (load > dbs_data->up_threshold) { dbs_info->down_skip = 0; - /* if we are already at full speed then break out early */ - if (requested_freq == policy->max) - goto out; - requested_freq += freq_step; if (requested_freq > policy->max) requested_freq = policy->max; @@ -124,13 +120,7 @@ static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) /* Check for frequency decrease */ if (load < cs_tuners->down_threshold) { - /* - * if we cannot reduce the frequency anymore, break out early - */ - if (requested_freq == policy->min) - goto out; - - if (requested_freq > freq_step) + if (requested_freq > policy->min + freq_step) requested_freq -= freq_step; else requested_freq = policy->min; |
