diff options
author | Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> | 2025-05-14 17:19:26 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2025-05-17 04:01:32 +0300 |
commit | 135a8a4d25a2937b2727e3857471f305d78496da (patch) | |
tree | 596eeb2c47ba087f0a697c846afb98680bd47191 | |
parent | a7262ed4b163c411b450d74f2c7b34bde19ac78e (diff) | |
download | linux-135a8a4d25a2937b2727e3857471f305d78496da.tar.xz |
vsock/test: retry send() to avoid occasional failure in sigpipe test
When the other peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RD), there is a chance that
the send() call could occur before the message carrying the close
information arrives over the transport. In such cases, the send()
might still succeed. To avoid this race, let's retry the send() call
a few times, ensuring the test is more reliable.
Sleep a little before trying again to avoid flooding the other peer
and filling its receive buffer, causing false-negative.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250514141927.159456-3-sgarzare@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c index 613551132a96..920867b17965 100644 --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c @@ -1058,17 +1058,34 @@ static void sigpipe(int signo) have_sigpipe = 1; } +#define SEND_SLEEP_USEC (10 * 1000) + static void test_stream_check_sigpipe(int fd) { ssize_t res; have_sigpipe = 0; - res = send(fd, "A", 1, 0); - if (res != -1) { - fprintf(stderr, "expected send(2) failure, got %zi\n", res); - exit(EXIT_FAILURE); + /* When the other peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RD), there is a chance that + * the send() call could occur before the message carrying the close + * information arrives over the transport. In such cases, the send() + * might still succeed. To avoid this race, let's retry the send() call + * a few times, ensuring the test is more reliable. + */ + timeout_begin(TIMEOUT); + while(1) { + res = send(fd, "A", 1, 0); + if (res == -1) + break; + + /* Sleep a little before trying again to avoid flooding the + * other peer and filling its receive buffer, causing + * false-negative. + */ + timeout_usleep(SEND_SLEEP_USEC); + timeout_check("send"); } + timeout_end(); if (!have_sigpipe) { fprintf(stderr, "SIGPIPE expected\n"); @@ -1077,11 +1094,16 @@ static void test_stream_check_sigpipe(int fd) have_sigpipe = 0; - res = send(fd, "A", 1, MSG_NOSIGNAL); - if (res != -1) { - fprintf(stderr, "expected send(2) failure, got %zi\n", res); - exit(EXIT_FAILURE); + timeout_begin(TIMEOUT); + while(1) { + res = send(fd, "A", 1, MSG_NOSIGNAL); + if (res == -1) + break; + + timeout_usleep(SEND_SLEEP_USEC); + timeout_check("send"); } + timeout_end(); if (have_sigpipe) { fprintf(stderr, "SIGPIPE not expected\n"); |