summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2026-06-10 13:55:38 +0300
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2026-06-11 02:16:46 +0300
commit10627ddc0167aab5c1c390a10ef461e9937aba08 (patch)
tree5f8819af0af1878d52fa5ee9b4d19c21f362c28f
parent2e8ad1ff712d2a397e407c9fde60901f68d077dc (diff)
downloadlinux-10627ddc0167aab5c1c390a10ef461e9937aba08.tar.xz
bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays
The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 ("bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage") is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller's context, that is, A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) path. Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one. Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -> B(no storage) working while rejecting the A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) bridge. Fixes: abad3d0bad72 ("bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage") Reported-by: Lin Ma <malin89@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260610105539.705887-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/core.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index a656a8572bdb..649cce41e13f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2481,7 +2481,7 @@ static bool __bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map,
cookie = aux->cgroup_storage[i] ?
aux->cgroup_storage[i]->cookie : 0;
ret = map->owner->storage_cookie[i] == cookie ||
- !cookie;
+ (!cookie && !aux->tail_call_reachable);
}
if (ret &&
map->owner->attach_func_proto != aux->attach_func_proto) {