| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Replace traditional `#ifndef`/`#define`/`#endif` include guards with
`#pragma` once.
`#pragma once` is a widely supported preprocessor directive that
prevents header files from being included multiple times. It is
supported by all toolchains used to build edk2: GCC, Clang/LLVM, and
MSVC.
Compared to macro-based include guards, `#pragma once`:
- Eliminates the risk of macro name collisions or copy/paste errors
where two headers inadvertently use the same guard macro.
- Eliminate inconsistency in the way include guard macros are named
(e.g., some files use `__FILE_H__`, others use `FILE_H_`, etc.).
- Reduces boilerplate (three lines replaced by one).
- Avoids polluting the macro namespace with guard symbols.
- Can improve build times as the preprocessor can skip re-opening the
file entirely, rather than re-reading it to find the matching
`#endif` ("multiple-include optimization").
- Note that some compilers may already optimize traditional include
guards, by recognzining the idiomatic pattern.
This change is made acknowledging that overall portability of the
code will technically be reduced, as `#pragma once` is not part of the
C/C++ standards.
However, this is considered acceptable given:
1. edk2 already defines a subset of supported compilers in
BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template, all of which have supported
`#pragma once` for over two decades.
2. There have been concerns raised to the project about inconsistent
include guard naming and potential macro collisions.
Approximate compiler support dates:
- MSVC: Supported since Visual C++ 4.2 (1996)
- GCC: Supported since 3.4 (2004)
(http://gnu.ist.utl.pt/software/gcc/gcc-3.4/changes.html)
- Clang (LLVM based): Since initial release in 2007
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
|
|
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the MdePkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
|
|
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
Replace BSD 2-Clause License with BSD+Patent License. This change is
based on the following emails:
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-February/036260.html
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-October/030385.html
RFCs with detailed process for the license change:
V3: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/038116.html
V2: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/037669.html
V1: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/037500.html
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
|
|
In SafeUintnToChar8(), update its output parameter name.
Update pui8Result --> Result to match its library implementation
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
|
|
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=798
SafeIntLib provides helper functions to prevent integer overflow
during type conversion, addition, subtraction, and multiplication.
Conversion Functions
====================
* Converting from a signed type to an unsigned type of the same
size, or vice-versa.
* Converting to a smaller type that could possibly overflow.
* Converting from a signed type to a larger unsigned type.
Unsigned Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication
===============================================
* Unsigned integer math functions protect from overflow and
underflow (in case of subtraction).
Signed Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication
============================================
* Strongly consider using unsigned numbers.
* Signed numbers are often used where unsigned numbers should
be used. For example file sizes and array indices should always
be unsigned. Subtracting a larger positive signed number from a
smaller positive signed number with SafeInt32Sub() will succeed,
producing a negative number, that then must not be used as an
array index (but can occasionally be used as a pointer index.)
Similarly for adding a larger magnitude negative number to a
smaller magnitude positive number.
* SafeIntLib does not protect you from such errors. It tells you
if your integer operations overflowed, not if you are doing the
right thing with your non-overflowed integers.
* Likewise you can overflow a buffer with a non-overflowed
unsigned index.
Based on content from the following branch/commits:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/commit/21ef3a321c907b40fa93797619c9f6c686dd92e0
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/commit/ca516b1a61315c2d823f453e12d2135098f53d61
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/commit/33bab4031a417d7d5a7d356c15a14c2e60302b2d
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
|
