summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/meta-aspeed/recipes-aspeed/python/socsec
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2026-03-26meta-aspeed: socsec: handle latest pythonPatrick Williams2-25/+63
socsec fails to build with the latest openembedded core due to Python package updates and socsec using deprecated libraries. Add a patch that fixes issues, which has been submitted to AspeedTech-BMC's repository. Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> Change-Id: I11018b6494c6adcaca2762ca43b747d5f92bccd8
2024-07-15meta-aspeed: adjust our patch upstream statusAndrew Geissler1-2/+2
Newer yocto has removed the "Accepted" status[1] and requires a Backport with the version it will come in. [1]: https://docs.yoctoproject.org/contributor-guide/recipe-style-guide.html#patch-upstream-status Change-Id: I5b788dfa7788c021f6d10298016b58943e188808 Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com>
2023-09-01meta-aspeed: Fix value_start issue in `rev_id` pathAndrew Jeffery1-0/+25
There's a bug in socsec that prevents the IBM's configuration from successfully building an OTP image. I have got the fix merged upstream: https://github.com/AspeedTech-BMC/socsec/pull/18 However, Aspeed do not plan on doing a release until October: > [ 17:51 ] arj: @Troy Lee any chance Neal can tag a new socsec release so we can bump it in OpenBMC and pick up some recent fixes? > [ 18:25 ] Troy Lee: Current schedule is October. https://discord.com/channels/775381525260664832/922871693008068638/1144547174286377062 For now, fix otptool using a recipe patch, in violation of the usual guidelines. I prefer we do this over switching to a "git" version for the recipe as instability with these tools really cannot be tolerated. Change-Id: I65b1992b5479ea257cfa65fd8b3cfc021b7d3dea Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>