diff options
author | Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> | 2021-12-13 20:45:19 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> | 2022-02-22 23:30:31 +0300 |
commit | 2407a2b2bc06d0d919de54356854d717aa4a7501 (patch) | |
tree | dcb0a44e56867c032ac58c22d3056ec987fda9c5 | |
parent | 192e286b168d760129267653f7bff7647b590a8b (diff) | |
download | openbmc-2407a2b2bc06d0d919de54356854d717aa4a7501.tar.xz |
treewide: remove MAINTAINERS
The MAINTAINERS files are no longer used and are out of date (references
to IRC still exist in most of them). Remove them and rely on the OWNERS
exclusively.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
Change-Id: I0f5d2719ad97e218ce03c4503efe1b1c92ac455e
-rw-r--r-- | MAINTAINERS | 47 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-amd/MAINTAINERS | 45 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-ampere/MAINTAINERS | 49 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-aspeed/MAINTAINERS | 49 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-asrock/MAINTAINERS | 45 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-bytedance/MAINTAINERS | 46 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-facebook/MAINTAINERS | 46 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-fii/MAINTAINERS | 49 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-google/MAINTAINERS | 51 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-hpe/MAINTAINERS | 48 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-ibm/MAINTAINERS | 45 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-inspur/MAINTAINERS | 46 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-intel-openbmc/MAINTAINERS | 66 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-inventec/MAINTAINERS | 46 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-nuvoton/MAINTAINERS | 52 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-openpower/MAINTAINERS | 46 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-phosphor/MAINTAINERS | 46 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-quanta/MAINTAINERS | 49 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-supermicro/MAINTAINERS | 47 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | meta-yadro/MAINTAINERS | 48 |
20 files changed, 0 insertions, 966 deletions
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 0e0100e420..0000000000 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,47 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com> <radsquirrel!> -R: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com> <radsquirrel!> -R: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> <geissonator!> diff --git a/meta-amd/MAINTAINERS b/meta-amd/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index a46f429d10..0000000000 --- a/meta-amd/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@amd.com> diff --git a/meta-ampere/MAINTAINERS b/meta-ampere/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 7b44e5883f..0000000000 --- a/meta-ampere/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Thang Q. Nguyen <thang@os.amperecomputing.com> <thangqn!> -M: Tung Nguyen <tungnguyen@os.amperecomputing.com> <tungnguyen-ampere!> -R: Phong Vo <phong@os.amperecomputing.com> -R: Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com> - diff --git a/meta-aspeed/MAINTAINERS b/meta-aspeed/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index f1f736f31b..0000000000 --- a/meta-aspeed/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -# THIS REPOSITORY HAS A DIFFERENT SUBMISSION PROCESS: this is a subtree in -# @openbmc and is synced by the maintainer using git-subtree. Please submit -# changes against @openbmc. -M: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com> <radsquirrel!> -M: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> diff --git a/meta-asrock/MAINTAINERS b/meta-asrock/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index ae85d8344b..0000000000 --- a/meta-asrock/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net> <zevweiss!> diff --git a/meta-bytedance/MAINTAINERS b/meta-bytedance/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index c5f155be15..0000000000 --- a/meta-bytedance/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Lei YU <yulei.sh@bytedance.com> <LeiYU!> -R: Lotus Xu <xuxiaohan@bytedance.com> diff --git a/meta-facebook/MAINTAINERS b/meta-facebook/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index a27fe90359..0000000000 --- a/meta-facebook/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Amithash Prasad <amithash@fb.com> -M: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> <stwcx!> diff --git a/meta-fii/MAINTAINERS b/meta-fii/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 9be6f8a3d9..0000000000 --- a/meta-fii/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com> <benjaminfair!> -M: Vivekanand Veeracholan <vveerach@google.com> <vveerach!> -M: Lancelot Kao <lancelot.kao@fii-usa.com> <Lancelot-Kao!> -M: Mohaimen Alsamarai <Mohaimen.Alsamarai@fii-na.com> <Mohaimen13!> -M: XP Chen <Xiao-Peng.Chen@fii-na.com> <expeeee!> diff --git a/meta-google/MAINTAINERS b/meta-google/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 27ea1b5e9e..0000000000 --- a/meta-google/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,51 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Nancy Yuen <yuenn@google.com> <yuennancy!> -M: William Kennington <wak@google.com> <wak-work!> -M: Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com> <benjaminfair!> -M: Ed Tanous <edtanous@google.com> <edtanous!> -M: Brandon Kim <brandonkim@google.com> <brandonk!> -M: Willy Tu <wltu@google.com> <wltu!> -M: Nan Zhou <nanzhoumails@gmail.com> <fighternan!> diff --git a/meta-hpe/MAINTAINERS b/meta-hpe/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 3fbcd38450..0000000000 --- a/meta-hpe/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,48 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Mike Garrett <mike.garrett@hpe.com> -M: Jean-Marie Verdun <jean-marie.verdun@hpe.com> -M: Nick Hawkins <nhawkins48@gmail.com> -M: Nick Pedrana <allan.pedrana@gmail.com> diff --git a/meta-ibm/MAINTAINERS b/meta-ibm/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 412d79dbe6..0000000000 --- a/meta-ibm/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> <geissonator!> diff --git a/meta-inspur/MAINTAINERS b/meta-inspur/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 0710437fe7..0000000000 --- a/meta-inspur/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: George Liu <liuxiwei@inspur.com> <liuxiwei!> -R: Lei Yu <mine260309@gmail.com> <LeiYU!> diff --git a/meta-intel-openbmc/MAINTAINERS b/meta-intel-openbmc/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 9a27e5d453..0000000000 --- a/meta-intel-openbmc/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,66 +0,0 @@ -List of maintainers for meta-intel -=============================== - -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -Change approval rules: - - - Patches must be available for review for a minimum of 48 hours before it - can be submitted. - - Patches must be be approved (+1) by at least 2 maintainers. - - Patches must not have an unresolved -1 vote by any maintainer. - - Patches should have all maintainers added for visibility. - - Patches should include unit tests where possible. - - Feel free to ping on IRC about patches that look good but have not - received +2 - -Design approval rules: - - - Design discussions should be carried out via email with, at minimum, - all maintainers on the thread. It's encouraged to include the - OpenBMC mailing list in the thread as well. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com> <vmauery!> -M: Jason Bills <jason.m.bills@linux.intel.com> <jmbills!> diff --git a/meta-inventec/MAINTAINERS b/meta-inventec/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 83ff5a04c5..0000000000 --- a/meta-inventec/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Habeeb Mohammed <mohammed.habeeb@inventec.com> -M: Ye Vic <ye.vic@inventec.com> diff --git a/meta-nuvoton/MAINTAINERS b/meta-nuvoton/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 4207abdfeb..0000000000 --- a/meta-nuvoton/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,52 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com> <benjaminfair!> -R: Fran Hsu <fran.hsu@quantatw.com> <franhsu!> -R: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> -R: Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com> -R: Joseph Liu <kwliu@nuvoton.com> -R: Samuel Jiang <chyishian.jiang@gmail.com> -R: Stanley Chu <yschu@nuvoton.com> -R: George Hung <george.hung@quantatw.com> diff --git a/meta-openpower/MAINTAINERS b/meta-openpower/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 565d46c837..0000000000 --- a/meta-openpower/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> <shenki!> -M: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> <geissonator!> diff --git a/meta-phosphor/MAINTAINERS b/meta-phosphor/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 81dd7c5aff..0000000000 --- a/meta-phosphor/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com> <radsquirrel!> -M: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com> <geissonator!> diff --git a/meta-quanta/MAINTAINERS b/meta-quanta/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 5bb6a2f428..0000000000 --- a/meta-quanta/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com> <benjaminfair!> -M: Brandon Kim <brandonkim@google.com> <brandonk!> -M: Fran Hsu <fran.hsu@quantatw.com> <franhsu!> -M: George Hung <george.hung@quantatw.com> <ghung!> -R: Buddy Huang <buddy.huang@quantatw.com> <buddyhunag!> diff --git a/meta-supermicro/MAINTAINERS b/meta-supermicro/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 27d89886bc..0000000000 --- a/meta-supermicro/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,47 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <DISCORD_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Ryan Sie <RyanS@supermicro.com.tw> <RyanSie!> -M: Ryan Zhou <RyanZ@supermicro.com> -M: Kevin Cheng <KevinCheng@supermicro.com.tw> diff --git a/meta-yadro/MAINTAINERS b/meta-yadro/MAINTAINERS deleted file mode 100644 index 6b1b60261a..0000000000 --- a/meta-yadro/MAINTAINERS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,48 +0,0 @@ -How to use this list: - Find the most specific section entry (described below) that matches where - your change lives and add the reviewers (R) and maintainers (M) as - reviewers. You can use the same method to track down who knows a particular - code base best. - - Your change/query may span multiple entries; that is okay. - - If you do not find an entry that describes your request at all, someone - forgot to update this list; please at least file an issue or send an email - to a maintainer, but preferably you should just update this document. - -Description of section entries: - - Section entries are structured according to the following scheme: - - X: NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!> - X: ... - . - . - . - - Where REPO_NAME is the name of the repository within the OpenBMC GitHub - organization; FILE_PATH is a file path within the repository, possibly with - wildcards; X is a tag of one of the following types: - - M: Denotes maintainer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - if omitted from an entry, assume one of the maintainers from the - MAINTAINERS entry. - R: Denotes reviewer; has fields NAME <EMAIL_USERNAME@DOMAIN> <IRC_USERNAME!>; - these people are to be added as reviewers for a change matching the repo - path. - F: Denotes forked from an external repository; has fields URL. - - Line comments are to be denoted "# SOME COMMENT" (typical shell style - comment); it is important to follow the correct syntax and semantics as we - may want to use automated tools with this file in the future. - - A change cannot be added to an OpenBMC repository without a MAINTAINER's - approval; thus, a MAINTAINER should always be listed as a reviewer. - -START OF MAINTAINERS LIST -------------------------- - -M: Alexander Filippov <a.filippov@yadro.com> <nest1ing!> -M: Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin@yadro.com> <AAmelkin_YADRO!> -R: Artem Senichev <artemsen@gmail.com> <artemsen!> -R: Andrei Kartashev <a.kartashev@yadro.com> <alatar!> |