diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta-xilinx/meta-microblaze/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10/0046-Patch-Microblaze-We-will-check-the-possibility-of-pe.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | meta-xilinx/meta-microblaze/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10/0046-Patch-Microblaze-We-will-check-the-possibility-of-pe.patch | 87 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 87 deletions
diff --git a/meta-xilinx/meta-microblaze/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10/0046-Patch-Microblaze-We-will-check-the-possibility-of-pe.patch b/meta-xilinx/meta-microblaze/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10/0046-Patch-Microblaze-We-will-check-the-possibility-of-pe.patch deleted file mode 100644 index eebf6ee72..000000000 --- a/meta-xilinx/meta-microblaze/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10/0046-Patch-Microblaze-We-will-check-the-possibility-of-pe.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,87 +0,0 @@ -From 444a09859149f8d21777a1c859ef2305ff86b211 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Mahesh Bodapati <mbodapat@xilinx.com> -Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:08:39 +0530 -Subject: [PATCH 46/54] [Patch,Microblaze] : We will check the possibility of - peephole2 optimization,if we can then we will fix the compiler issue. - ---- - gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md | 63 +++++++++++++++++------------ - 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md b/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md -index 207d2bf1b55..9b88666c0a6 100644 ---- a/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md -+++ b/gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.md -@@ -882,31 +882,44 @@ - (set_attr "mode" "SI") - (set_attr "length" "4")]) - --(define_peephole2 -- [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand") -- (fix:SI (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand"))) -- (set (pc) -- (if_then_else (match_operator 2 "ordered_comparison_operator" -- [(match_operand:SI 3 "register_operand") -- (match_operand:SI 4 "arith_operand")]) -- (label_ref (match_operand 5)) -- (pc)))] -- "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && !TARGET_MB_64" -- [(set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 3))] -- -- { -- rtx condition; -- rtx cmp_op0 = operands[3]; -- rtx cmp_op1 = operands[4]; -- rtx comp_reg = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, MB_ABI_ASM_TEMP_REGNUM); -- -- emit_insn (gen_cstoresf4 (comp_reg, operands[2], -- gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op0)), -- gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op1)))); -- condition = gen_rtx_NE (SImode, comp_reg, const0_rtx); -- emit_jump_insn (gen_condjump (condition, operands[5])); -- } --) -+;; peephole2 optimization will be done only if fint and if-then-else -+;; are dependent.added condition for the same. -+;; if they are dependent then gcc is giving "flow control insn inside a basic block" -+;; testcase: -+;; volatile float vec = 1.0; -+;; volatile int ci = 2; -+;; register int cj = (int)(vec); -+;;// ci=cj; -+;;// if (ci <0) { -+;; if (cj < 0) { -+;; ci = 0; -+;; } -+;; commenting for now.we will check the possibility of this optimization later -+ -+;;(define_peephole2 -+;; [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand") -+;; (fix:SI (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand"))) -+;; (set (pc) -+;; (if_then_else (match_operator 2 "ordered_comparison_operator" -+;; [(match_operand:SI 3 "register_operand") -+;; (match_operand:SI 4 "arith_operand")]) -+;; (label_ref (match_operand 5)) -+;; (pc)))] -+;; "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && !TARGET_MB_64 && ((REGNO (operands[0])) == (REGNO (operands[3])))" -+;; [(set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 3))] -+;; { -+;; rtx condition; -+;; rtx cmp_op0 = operands[3]; -+;; rtx cmp_op1 = operands[4]; -+;; rtx comp_reg = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, MB_ABI_ASM_TEMP_REGNUM); -+;; -+;; emit_insn (gen_cstoresf4 (comp_reg, operands[2], -+;; gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op0)), -+;; gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (cmp_op1)))); -+;; condition = gen_rtx_NE (SImode, comp_reg, const0_rtx); -+;; emit_jump_insn (gen_condjump (condition, operands[5])); -+;; } -+;;) - - ;;---------------------------------------------------------------- - ;; Negation and one's complement --- -2.17.1 - |