summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-03-20cpufreq: scpi: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-9/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from scpi driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: sc520: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-1/+2
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from sc520 driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: s3c24xx: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-4/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from s3c24xx driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: qoirq: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-11/+2
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from qoirq driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: pxa: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar2-3/+5
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from pxa driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: ppc_cbe: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-3/+2
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from ppc_cbe driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: powernow: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar3-11/+5
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from powernow driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: p4-clockmod: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-1/+2
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from p4-clockmod driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: mediatek: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-10/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from mediatek driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: longhaul: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-1/+2
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from longhaul driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: ia64-acpi: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-6/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from ia64-acpi driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: elanfreq: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-1/+2
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from elanfreq driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: e_powersaver: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-7/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from e_powersaver driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-7/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from cpufreq-dt driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: brcmstb: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-5/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from brcmstb driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: arm_big_little: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-8/+1
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from arm_big_little driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: ACPI: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-9/+11
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table in the acpi-cpufreq driver. The driver needs to crosscheck if the max frequency corresponds to the P-state 0 or not and the same is done from the ->ready() callback now. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: Don't validate cpufreq table from cpufreq_generic_init()Viresh Kumar1-8/+1
The cpufreq table is already validated by the cpufreq core and none of the users of cpufreq_generic_init() have any dependency on it to validate the table as well. Don't validate the cpufreq table anymore from cpufreq_generic_init(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: imx6q: Find max freq from frequency table itselfViresh Kumar1-3/+4
This is a preparatory commit to make policy->suspend_freq independent of validation of the cpufreq table, as a later commit would update cpufreq_generic_init() to not validate the cpufreq table any longer. The driver already assumes the order in which the frequency table is sorted and we can get the max frequency easily. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: scpi: Add thermal dependencyArnd Bergmann1-0/+1
A built-in scpi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular thermal framework: drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_ready': scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x4c): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register' drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_exit': scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister' This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work. Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the THERMAL dependency. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: cppc_cpufreq: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init() failure pathChunyu Hu1-2/+7
Kmemleak reported the below leak. When cppc_cpufreq_init went into failure path, the cpu mask is not freed. After fix, this report is gone. And to avaoid potential NULL pointer reference, check the cpu value first. unreferenced object 0xffff800fd5ea4880 (size 128): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294939510 (age 668.680s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .... ........... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffff0000082c4ae4>] __kmalloc_node+0x278/0x634 [<ffff0000088f4a74>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x28/0x60 [<ffff0000088f4af0>] zalloc_cpumask_var+0x14/0x1c [<ffff000008d20254>] cppc_cpufreq_init+0xd0/0x19c [<ffff000008083828>] do_one_initcall+0xec/0x15c [<ffff000008cd1018>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x2a4 [<ffff0000089099b0>] kernel_init+0x18/0x10c [<ffff000008084d50>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-19cpufreq: powernv: Don't validate the frequency table twiceViresh Kumar1-8/+3
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from powernv driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-13cpufreq: scmi: add thermal dependencyArnd Bergmann1-0/+1
A built-in scmi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular thermal framework: drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.o: In function `scmi_cpufreq_ready': scmi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register' drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.o: In function `scmi_cpufreq_exit': scmi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister' This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work. Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the THERMAL dependency. Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2018-03-07Merge tag 'scmi-updates-4.17' of ↵Arnd Bergmann3-0/+276
ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux into next/drivers Pull "ARM SCMI support for v4.17" from Sudeep Holla: ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI)[1] is more flexible and easily extensible than any of the existing interfaces. Few existing as well as future ARM platforms provide micro-controllers to abstract various power and other system management tasks which have similar interfaces, both in terms of the functions that are provided by them, and in terms of how requests are communicated to them. There are quite a few protocols like ARM SCPI, TI SCI, QCOM RPM, Nvidia Tegra BPMP, and so on already. This specification is to standardize and avoid any further fragmentation in the design of such interface by various vendors. The current SCMI driver implementation is very basic and initial support. It lacks support for notifications, asynchronous/delayed response, perf/power statistics region and sensor register region. Mailbox is the only form of transport supported currently in the driver. SCMI supports interrupt based mailbox communication, where, on completion of the processing of a message, the caller receives an interrupt as well as polling for completion. SCMI is designed to minimize the dependency on the mailbox/transport hardware. So in terms of SCMI, each channel in the mailbox includes memory area, doorbell and completion interrupt. However the doorbell and completion interrupt is highly mailbox dependent which was bit of controversial as part of SCMI/mailbox discussions. Arnd and me discussed about the few aspects of SCMI and the mailbox framework: 1. Use of mailbox framework for doorbell type mailbox controller: - Such hardware may not require any data to be sent to signal the remote about the presence of a message. The channel will have in-built information on how to trigger the signal to the remote. There are few mailbox controller drivers which are purely doorbell based. e.g.QCOM IPC, STM, Tegra, ACPI PCC,..etc 2. Supporting other mailbox controller: - SCMI just needs a mechanism to signal the remote firmware. Such controller may need fixed message to be sent to trigger a doorbell. In such case we may need to get that data from DT and pass the same to the controller. It's not covered in the current DT binding, but can be extended as optional property in future. However handling notifications may be interesting on such mailbox, but again there is no way to interpret what the data field(remote message) means, it could be a bit mask or a number or don't-care. Arnd mentioned that he doesn't like the way the mailbox binding deals with doorbell-type hardware, but we do have quite a few precedent drivers already and changing the binding to add a data field would not make it any better, but could cause other problems. So he is happy with the status quo of SCMI implementation. [1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.den0056a/index.html * tag 'scmi-updates-4.17' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux: cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol hwmon: add support for sensors exported via ARM SCMI hwmon: (core) Add hwmon_max to hwmon_sensor_types enumeration clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain support using genpd firmware: arm_scmi: add per-protocol channels support using idr objects firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channels firmware: arm_scmi: add option for polling based performance domain operations firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers firmware: arm_scmi: probe and initialise all the supported protocols firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocol firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocol firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI dt-bindings: arm: add support for ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) protocol dt-bindings: mailbox: add support for mailbox client shared memory
2018-03-05Merge cpufreq fixes from v4.16-rc4.Rafael J. Wysocki3-8/+22
2018-03-02Merge branch 'cpufreq-scpi'Rafael J. Wysocki2-7/+15
* cpufreq-scpi: cpufreq: scpi: Fix incorrect arm_big_little config dependency cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
2018-02-28cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switchingSudeep Holla1-0/+18
The cpufreq core provides option for drivers to implement fast_switch callback which is invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context. This patch adds support for fast_switch callback in SCMI cpufreq driver by making use of polling based SCMI transfer. It also sets the flag fast_switch_possible. Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2018-02-28cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocolSudeep Holla3-0/+258
On some ARM based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control Processor(SCP) provides the overall power, clock, reset and system control including CPU DVFS. SCMI Message Protocol is used to communicate with the SCP. This patch adds a cpufreq driver for such systems using SCMI interface to drive CPU DVFS. Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: powernow-k8: Drop unnecessary return statements from two functionsMarkus Elfring1-2/+0
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following. WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful Thus remove such a statement in the affected functions. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: powernow-k8: Drop memory allocation error messages from three functionsMarkus Elfring1-9/+3
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: qoriq: Drop memory allocation error messages from ↵Markus Elfring1-6/+2
qoriq_cpufreq_cpu_init() Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in this function. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: s3c24xx: Drop memory allocation error messages from two functionsMarkus Elfring1-6/+2
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: tegra186: Break after initialization is done for policy->cpuViresh Kumar1-0/+1
There are two clusters (2 + 4 CPUs) on this platform and a separate cpufreq policy is available for each of the CPUs. The loop in tegra186_cpufreq_init() tries to find the structure for the right CPU and finish initialization. But it is missing a `break` statement at the end, which forces it to restart the loop even when the CPU already matched and initialization is done. Fix that by adding the missing `break` statement. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: Validate frequency table in the coreViresh Kumar2-5/+24
By design, cpufreq drivers are responsible for calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() from their ->init() callbacks to validate the frequency table. However, if a cpufreq driver is buggy and fails to do so properly, it lead to unexpected behavior of the driver or the cpufreq core at a later point in time. It would be better if the core could validate the frequency table during driver initialization. To that end, introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() and make the cpufreq core call it right after invoking the ->init() callback of the driver and destroy the cpufreq policy if the table is invalid. For the time being the validation of the table happens twice, once from the driver and then from the core. The individual drivers will be updated separately to drop table validation if they don't need it for other reasons. The frequency table is marked "sorted" or "unsorted" by the new helper now instead of in cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), as it should only be done after validating the table (which the drivers won't do going forward). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Subject/changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: Reorder cpufreq_online() error code pathViresh Kumar1-3/+3
Ideally the de-allocation of resources should happen in the exact opposite order in which they were allocated. It helps maintain the code in long term, even if nothing really breaks with incorrect ordering. That wasn't followed in cpufreq_online() and it has some inconsistencies. For example, the symlinks were created from within the locked region while they are removed only after putting the locks. Also ->exit() should have been called only after the symlinks are removed and the lock is dropped, as that was the case when ->init() was first called. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: mediatek: Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug()Viresh Kumar1-1/+1
With multi-platform build images, this shows a message on non mediatek platforms, which is unnecessary. Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug() here. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: s3c24xx: Fix broken s3c_cpufreq_init()Viresh Kumar1-1/+7
commit a307a1e6bc0d "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()" accidentally broke cpufreq on s3c2410 and s3c2412. These two platforms don't have a CPU frequency table and used to skip calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() for them. But with the above commit, we started calling it unconditionally and that will eventually fail as the frequency table pointer is NULL. Fix this by calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() conditionally again. Fixes: a307a1e6bc0d "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()" Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13+ Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: scpi: Fix incorrect arm_big_little config dependencySudeep Holla1-3/+3
Commit 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency) removed the SCPI cpufreq dependency on arm_big_little cpufreq driver. However the Kconfig entry still depends on ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ which is clearly wrong. This patch removes that unnecessary Kconfig dependency. Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency) Reported-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter functionDietmar Eggemann1-4/+12
Commit 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency) changed the cpufreq driver on juno from arm_big_little to scpi. The scpi set_target function does not call the frequency-invariance setter function arch_set_freq_scale() like the arm_big_little set_target function does. As a result the task scheduler load and utilization signals are not frequency-invariant on this platform anymore. Fix this by adding a call to arch_set_freq_scale() into scpi_cpufreq_set_target(). Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency) Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-15Merge branch 'x86-pti-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds6-11/+11
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 PTI and Spectre related fixes and updates from Ingo Molnar: "Here's the latest set of Spectre and PTI related fixes and updates: Spectre: - Add entry code register clearing to reduce the Spectre attack surface - Update the Spectre microcode blacklist - Inline the KVM Spectre helpers to get close to v4.14 performance again. - Fix indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() - Fix/improve Spectre related kernel messages - Fix array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint - KVM: fix two MSR handling bugs PTI: - Fix a paranoid entry PTI CR3 handling bug - Fix comments objtool: - Fix paranoid_entry() frame pointer warning - Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable - Various fixes - Add Add Peter Zijlstra as objtool co-maintainer Misc: - Various x86 entry code self-test fixes - Improve/simplify entry code stack frame generation and handling after recent heavy-handed PTI and Spectre changes. (There's two more WIP improvements expected here.) - Type fix for cache entries There's also some low risk non-fix changes I've included in this branch to reduce backporting conflicts: - rename a confusing x86_cpu field name - de-obfuscate the naming of single-TLB flushing primitives" * 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits) x86/entry/64: Fix CR3 restore in paranoid_exit() x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned int x86/spectre: Fix an error message x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault x86/mm: Rename flush_tlb_single() and flush_tlb_one() to __flush_tlb_one_[user|kernel]() x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro x86/speculation: Fix up array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint x86/debug: Use UD2 for WARN() x86/debug, objtool: Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable objtool: Fix segfault in ignore_unreachable_insn() selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step_syscall.c selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in test_mremap_vdso.c selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory selftests/x86/pkeys: Remove unused functions selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none x86/entry/64: Remove the unused 'icebp' macro ...
2018-02-15x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_steppingJia Zhang6-11/+11
x86_mask is a confusing name which is hard to associate with the processor's stepping. Additionally, correct an indent issue in lib/cpu.c. Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com> [ Updated it to more recent kernels. ] Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bp@alien8.de Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514771530-70829-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-08arm: imx: Add MODULE_ALIAS for cpufreqNicolas Chauvet1-0/+1
Without this, the imx6q-cpufreq driver isn't loaded automatically when built as a module Tested on wandboard quad with a fedora 27 kernel rpm Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08cpufreq: Add and use cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry_idx()Dominik Brodowski4-13/+12
Pointer subtraction is slow and tedious. Therefore, replace all instances where cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry loops contained such substractions with an iteration macro providing an index to the frequency_table entry. Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180120020237.GM13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable HWP during system resume on CPU0Chen Yu1-0/+5
When maxcpus=1 is in the kernel command line, the BP is responsible for re-enabling the HWP - because currently only the APs invoke intel_pstate_hwp_enable() during their online process - which might put the system into unstable state after resume. Fix this by enabling the HWP explicitly on BP during resume. Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com> [ rjw: Subject/changelog, minor modifications ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08cpufreq: scpi: fix error return code in scpi_cpufreq_init()Wei Yongjun1-0/+1
Fix to return a negative error code from the clk_get() error handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency) Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07cpufreq: scpi: fix static checker warning cdev isn't an ERR_PTRSudeep Holla1-4/+1
Commit 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency) leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c:203 scpi_cpufreq_ready() warn: 'cdev' isn't an ERR_PTR of_cpufreq_cooling_register() returns NULL on error. This patch removes the incorrect IS_ERR check on the returned pointer. Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency) Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07cpufreq: remove at32ap-cpufreqCorentin LABBE3-138/+0
Since AVR32 arch was removed, at32ap-cpufreq is useless. Remove this driver. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07cpufreq: AMD: Ignore the check for ProcFeedback in ST/CZAkshu Agrawal1-2/+9
In ST/CZ CPUID 8000_0007_EDX[11, ProcFeedbackInterface] is 0, but the mechanism is still available and can be used. Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@amd.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-05cpufreq: Skip cpufreq resume if it's not suspendedBo Yan1-0/+3
cpufreq_resume can be called even without preceding cpufreq_suspend. This can happen in following scenario: suspend_devices_and_enter --> dpm_suspend_start --> dpm_prepare --> device_prepare : this function errors out --> dpm_suspend: this is skipped due to dpm_prepare failure this means cpufreq_suspend is skipped over --> goto Recover_platform, due to previous error --> goto Resume_devices --> dpm_resume_end --> dpm_resume --> cpufreq_resume In case schedutil is used as frequency governor, cpufreq_resume will eventually call sugov_start, which does following: memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu)); .... This effectively erases function pointer for frequency update, causing crash later on. The function pointer would have been set correctly if subsequent cpufreq_add_update_util_hook runs successfully, but that function returns earlier because cpufreq_suspend was not called: if (WARN_ON(per_cpu(cpufreq_update_util_data, cpu))) return; The fix is to check cpufreq_suspended first, if it's false, that means cpufreq_suspend was not called in the first place, so do not resume cpufreq. Signed-off-by: Bo Yan <byan@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Dropped printing a message ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-01-18Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq-thermal' into pm-cpufreqRafael J. Wysocki4-82/+4
* pm-cpufreq-thermal: cpu_cooling: Remove static-power related documentation cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff cpu_cooling: Keep only one of_cpufreq*cooling_register() helper cpu_cooling: Remove unused cpufreq_power_cooling_register() cpu_cooling: Make of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() parse DT
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2025-09-30 13:21:29 +0300