diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c | 238 |
1 files changed, 217 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c index 7c22997de906..00e45b6d4f24 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c @@ -23,17 +23,37 @@ #define DEBUG_PASSUP -static inline void rm_writeb(unsigned long paddr, u8 val) +static void icp_rm_deliver_irq(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, + u32 new_irq); + +/* -- ICS routines -- */ +static void ics_rm_check_resend(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, + struct kvmppc_ics *ics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp) { - __asm__ __volatile__("sync; stbcix %0,0,%1" - : : "r" (val), "r" (paddr) : "memory"); + int i; + + arch_spin_lock(&ics->lock); + + for (i = 0; i < KVMPPC_XICS_IRQ_PER_ICS; i++) { + struct ics_irq_state *state = &ics->irq_state[i]; + + if (!state->resend) + continue; + + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, state->number); + arch_spin_lock(&ics->lock); + } + + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); } +/* -- ICP routines -- */ + static void icp_rm_set_vcpu_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *this_vcpu) { struct kvmppc_icp *this_icp = this_vcpu->arch.icp; - unsigned long xics_phys; int cpu; /* Mark the target VCPU as having an interrupt pending */ @@ -56,9 +76,8 @@ static void icp_rm_set_vcpu_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, /* In SMT cpu will always point to thread 0, we adjust it */ cpu += vcpu->arch.ptid; - /* Not too hard, then poke the target */ - xics_phys = paca[cpu].kvm_hstate.xics_phys; - rm_writeb(xics_phys + XICS_MFRR, IPI_PRIORITY); + smp_mb(); + kvmhv_rm_send_ipi(cpu); } static void icp_rm_clr_vcpu_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -116,6 +135,180 @@ static inline int check_too_hard(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, return (xics->real_mode_dbg || icp->rm_action) ? H_TOO_HARD : H_SUCCESS; } +static void icp_rm_check_resend(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, + struct kvmppc_icp *icp) +{ + u32 icsid; + + /* Order this load with the test for need_resend in the caller */ + smp_rmb(); + for_each_set_bit(icsid, icp->resend_map, xics->max_icsid + 1) { + struct kvmppc_ics *ics = xics->ics[icsid]; + + if (!test_and_clear_bit(icsid, icp->resend_map)) + continue; + if (!ics) + continue; + ics_rm_check_resend(xics, ics, icp); + } +} + +static bool icp_rm_try_to_deliver(struct kvmppc_icp *icp, u32 irq, u8 priority, + u32 *reject) +{ + union kvmppc_icp_state old_state, new_state; + bool success; + + do { + old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state); + + *reject = 0; + + /* See if we can deliver */ + success = new_state.cppr > priority && + new_state.mfrr > priority && + new_state.pending_pri > priority; + + /* + * If we can, check for a rejection and perform the + * delivery + */ + if (success) { + *reject = new_state.xisr; + new_state.xisr = irq; + new_state.pending_pri = priority; + } else { + /* + * If we failed to deliver we set need_resend + * so a subsequent CPPR state change causes us + * to try a new delivery. + */ + new_state.need_resend = true; + } + + } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); + + return success; +} + +static void icp_rm_deliver_irq(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, + u32 new_irq) +{ + struct ics_irq_state *state; + struct kvmppc_ics *ics; + u32 reject; + u16 src; + + /* + * This is used both for initial delivery of an interrupt and + * for subsequent rejection. + * + * Rejection can be racy vs. resends. We have evaluated the + * rejection in an atomic ICP transaction which is now complete, + * so potentially the ICP can already accept the interrupt again. + * + * So we need to retry the delivery. Essentially the reject path + * boils down to a failed delivery. Always. + * + * Now the interrupt could also have moved to a different target, + * thus we may need to re-do the ICP lookup as well + */ + + again: + /* Get the ICS state and lock it */ + ics = kvmppc_xics_find_ics(xics, new_irq, &src); + if (!ics) { + /* Unsafe increment, but this does not need to be accurate */ + xics->err_noics++; + return; + } + state = &ics->irq_state[src]; + + /* Get a lock on the ICS */ + arch_spin_lock(&ics->lock); + + /* Get our server */ + if (!icp || state->server != icp->server_num) { + icp = kvmppc_xics_find_server(xics->kvm, state->server); + if (!icp) { + /* Unsafe increment again*/ + xics->err_noicp++; + goto out; + } + } + + /* Clear the resend bit of that interrupt */ + state->resend = 0; + + /* + * If masked, bail out + * + * Note: PAPR doesn't mention anything about masked pending + * when doing a resend, only when doing a delivery. + * + * However that would have the effect of losing a masked + * interrupt that was rejected and isn't consistent with + * the whole masked_pending business which is about not + * losing interrupts that occur while masked. + * + * I don't differentiate normal deliveries and resends, this + * implementation will differ from PAPR and not lose such + * interrupts. + */ + if (state->priority == MASKED) { + state->masked_pending = 1; + goto out; + } + + /* + * Try the delivery, this will set the need_resend flag + * in the ICP as part of the atomic transaction if the + * delivery is not possible. + * + * Note that if successful, the new delivery might have itself + * rejected an interrupt that was "delivered" before we took the + * ics spin lock. + * + * In this case we do the whole sequence all over again for the + * new guy. We cannot assume that the rejected interrupt is less + * favored than the new one, and thus doesn't need to be delivered, + * because by the time we exit icp_rm_try_to_deliver() the target + * processor may well have already consumed & completed it, and thus + * the rejected interrupt might actually be already acceptable. + */ + if (icp_rm_try_to_deliver(icp, new_irq, state->priority, &reject)) { + /* + * Delivery was successful, did we reject somebody else ? + */ + if (reject && reject != XICS_IPI) { + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); + new_irq = reject; + goto again; + } + } else { + /* + * We failed to deliver the interrupt we need to set the + * resend map bit and mark the ICS state as needing a resend + */ + set_bit(ics->icsid, icp->resend_map); + state->resend = 1; + + /* + * If the need_resend flag got cleared in the ICP some time + * between icp_rm_try_to_deliver() atomic update and now, then + * we know it might have missed the resend_map bit. So we + * retry + */ + smp_mb(); + if (!icp->state.need_resend) { + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); + goto again; + } + } + out: + arch_spin_unlock(&ics->lock); +} + static void icp_rm_down_cppr(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, u8 new_cppr) { @@ -184,8 +377,8 @@ static void icp_rm_down_cppr(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp, * separately here as well. */ if (resend) { - icp->rm_action |= XICS_RM_CHECK_RESEND; - icp->rm_resend_icp = icp; + icp->n_check_resend++; + icp_rm_check_resend(xics, icp); } } @@ -300,16 +493,16 @@ int kvmppc_rm_h_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long server, } } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); - /* Pass rejects to virtual mode */ + /* Handle reject in real mode */ if (reject && reject != XICS_IPI) { - this_icp->rm_action |= XICS_RM_REJECT; - this_icp->rm_reject = reject; + this_icp->n_reject++; + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, reject); } - /* Pass resends to virtual mode */ + /* Handle resends in real mode */ if (resend) { - this_icp->rm_action |= XICS_RM_CHECK_RESEND; - this_icp->rm_resend_icp = icp; + this_icp->n_check_resend++; + icp_rm_check_resend(xics, icp); } return check_too_hard(xics, this_icp); @@ -365,10 +558,13 @@ int kvmppc_rm_h_cppr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cppr) } while (!icp_rm_try_update(icp, old_state, new_state)); - /* Pass rejects to virtual mode */ + /* + * Check for rejects. They are handled by doing a new delivery + * attempt (see comments in icp_rm_deliver_irq). + */ if (reject && reject != XICS_IPI) { - icp->rm_action |= XICS_RM_REJECT; - icp->rm_reject = reject; + icp->n_reject++; + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, reject); } bail: return check_too_hard(xics, icp); @@ -416,10 +612,10 @@ int kvmppc_rm_h_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long xirr) goto bail; state = &ics->irq_state[src]; - /* Still asserted, resend it, we make it look like a reject */ + /* Still asserted, resend it */ if (state->asserted) { - icp->rm_action |= XICS_RM_REJECT; - icp->rm_reject = irq; + icp->n_reject++; + icp_rm_deliver_irq(xics, icp, irq); } if (!hlist_empty(&vcpu->kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list)) { |