summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>2009-05-05 19:46:07 +0400
committerPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>2009-05-05 19:46:07 +0400
commit280f37afa2c270ff029cb420b34396aa002909c3 (patch)
tree6d90560f2210c7ddb4da5640a2d190357c4f41b4 /net
parentb98b4947cb79d670fceca0e951c092eea93e9baa (diff)
downloadlinux-280f37afa2c270ff029cb420b34396aa002909c3.tar.xz
netfilter: xt_cluster: fix use of cluster match with 32 nodes
This patch fixes a problem when you use 32 nodes in the cluster match: % iptables -I PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -m cluster \ --cluster-total-nodes 32 --cluster-local-node 32 \ --cluster-hash-seed 0xdeadbeef -j MARK --set-mark 0xffff iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information. % dmesg | tail -1 xt_cluster: this node mask cannot be higher than the total number of nodes The problem is related to this checking: if (info->node_mask >= (1 << info->total_nodes)) { printk(KERN_ERR "xt_cluster: this node mask cannot be " "higher than the total number of nodes\n"); return false; } (1 << 32) is 1. Thus, the checking fails. BTW, I said this before but I insist: I have only tested the cluster match with 2 nodes getting ~45% extra performance in an active-active setup. The maximum limit of 32 nodes is still completely arbitrary. I'd really appreciate if people that have more nodes in their setups let me know. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r--net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c8
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c b/net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c
index 6c4847662b85..69a639f35403 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c
@@ -135,7 +135,13 @@ static bool xt_cluster_mt_checkentry(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
{
struct xt_cluster_match_info *info = par->matchinfo;
- if (info->node_mask >= (1 << info->total_nodes)) {
+ if (info->total_nodes > XT_CLUSTER_NODES_MAX) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "xt_cluster: you have exceeded the maximum "
+ "number of cluster nodes (%u > %u)\n",
+ info->total_nodes, XT_CLUSTER_NODES_MAX);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (info->node_mask >= (1ULL << info->total_nodes)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "xt_cluster: this node mask cannot be "
"higher than the total number of nodes\n");
return false;