diff options
author | Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com> | 2021-10-12 08:20:19 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2021-10-26 22:25:55 +0300 |
commit | cd9733f5d75c94a32544d6ce5be47e14194cf137 (patch) | |
tree | 482cbaa3434e39675f0dfe9e30d8f8b8ac64184f /net/tls | |
parent | 04f8ef5643bcd8bcde25dfdebef998aea480b2ba (diff) | |
download | linux-cd9733f5d75c94a32544d6ce5be47e14194cf137.tar.xz |
tcp_bpf: Fix one concurrency problem in the tcp_bpf_send_verdict function
With two Msgs, msgA and msgB and a user doing nonblocking sendmsg calls (or
multiple cores) on a single socket 'sk' we could get the following flow.
msgA, sk msgB, sk
----------- ---------------
tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
lock(sk)
psock = sk->psock
tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
lock(sk) ... blocking
tcp_bpf_send_verdict
if (psock->eval == NONE)
psock->eval = sk_psock_msg_verdict
..
< handle SK_REDIRECT case >
release_sock(sk) < lock dropped so grab here >
ret = tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir
psock = sk->psock
tcp_bpf_send_verdict
lock_sock(sk) ... blocking on B
if (psock->eval == NONE) <- boom.
psock->eval will have msgA state
The problem here is we dropped the lock on msgA and grabbed it with msgB.
Now we have old state in psock and importantly psock->eval has not been
cleared. So msgB will run whatever action was done on A and the verdict
program may never see it.
Fixes: 604326b41a6fb ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012052019.184398-1-liujian56@huawei.com
Diffstat (limited to 'net/tls')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions