bpf: add BPF_CALL_x macros for declaring helpers

This work adds BPF_CALL_<n>() macros and converts all the eBPF helper functions
to use them, in a similar fashion like we do with SYSCALL_DEFINE<n>() macros
that are used today. Motivation for this is to hide all the register handling
and all necessary casts from the user, so that it is done automatically in the
background when adding a BPF_CALL_<n>() call.

This makes current helpers easier to review, eases to write future helpers,
avoids getting the casting mess wrong, and allows for extending all helpers at
once (f.e. build time checks, etc). It also helps detecting more easily in
code reviews that unused registers are not instrumented in the code by accident,
breaking compatibility with existing programs.

BPF_CALL_<n>() internals are quite similar to SYSCALL_DEFINE<n>() ones with some
fundamental differences, for example, for generating the actual helper function
that carries all u64 regs, we need to fill unused regs, so that we always end up
with 5 u64 regs as an argument.

I reviewed several 0-5 generated BPF_CALL_<n>() variants of the .i results and
they look all as expected. No sparse issue spotted. We let this also sit for a
few days with Fengguang's kbuild test robot, and there were no issues seen. On
s390, it barked on the "uses dynamic stack allocation" notice, which is an old
one from bpf_perf_event_output{,_tp}() reappearing here due to the conversion
to the call wrapper, just telling that the perf raw record/frag sits on stack
(gcc with s390's -mwarn-dynamicstack), but that's all. Did various runtime tests
and they were fine as well. All eBPF helpers are now converted to use these
macros, getting rid of a good chunk of all the raw castings.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 34 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 6df73bd1ba34..a5b8bf8cfcfd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/uidgid.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
 
 /* If kernel subsystem is allowing eBPF programs to call this function,
  * inside its own verifier_ops->get_func_proto() callback it should return
@@ -26,24 +27,10 @@
  * if program is allowed to access maps, so check rcu_read_lock_held in
  * all three functions.
  */
-static u64 bpf_map_lookup_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_lookup_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
 {
-	/* verifier checked that R1 contains a valid pointer to bpf_map
-	 * and R2 points to a program stack and map->key_size bytes were
-	 * initialized
-	 */
-	struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
-	void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2;
-	void *value;
-
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
-
-	value = map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
-
-	/* lookup() returns either pointer to element value or NULL
-	 * which is the meaning of PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL type
-	 */
-	return (unsigned long) value;
+	return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
 }
 
 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = {
@@ -54,15 +41,11 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = {
 	.arg2_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_map_update_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_4(bpf_map_update_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key,
+	   void *, value, u64, flags)
 {
-	struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
-	void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2;
-	void *value = (void *) (unsigned long) r3;
-
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
-
-	return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, r4);
+	return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
 }
 
 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = {
@@ -75,13 +58,9 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = {
 	.arg4_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_map_delete_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_delete_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
 {
-	struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
-	void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2;
-
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
-
 	return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
 }
 
@@ -99,7 +78,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto = {
 	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_get_smp_processor_id(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
 {
 	return smp_processor_id();
 }
@@ -110,7 +89,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto = {
 	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_ktime_get_ns(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_0(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
 {
 	/* NMI safe access to clock monotonic */
 	return ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
@@ -122,7 +101,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ktime_get_ns_proto = {
 	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_get_current_pid_tgid(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_current_pid_tgid)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = current;
 
@@ -138,7 +117,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_current_pid_tgid_proto = {
 	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_get_current_uid_gid(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_current_uid_gid)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = current;
 	kuid_t uid;
@@ -158,10 +137,9 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_current_uid_gid_proto = {
 	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
 };
 
-static u64 bpf_get_current_comm(u64 r1, u64 size, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_current_comm, char *, buf, u32, size)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = current;
-	char *buf = (char *) (long) r1;
 
 	if (unlikely(!task))
 		goto err_clear;