summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAmitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>2011-10-13 07:28:06 +0400
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2011-10-14 22:48:20 +0400
commitefaaa8b8414e0ab4ba09aaaf79ab92a34b75797b (patch)
treefb5680389af8de71154859c468adc83c04b7c1e4 /drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
parent207ae4a3733686df2aabd2dd6feefbde4e69cdd5 (diff)
downloadlinux-efaaa8b8414e0ab4ba09aaaf79ab92a34b75797b.tar.xz
mwifiex: use separate wait condition for each command node
Currently global wait condition (adapter->cmd_wait_q.condition) is used while sending synchronous commands to FW. When two threads enter in mwifiex_send_cmd_sync() routine at the same time, both the threads wait for their command responses. Since wait condition is same for both, they wake up simultaneously after getting response of 1st command. After this when a thread is waiting for command response of 3rd command, it wakes up after getting response of 2nd command and so on. Therefore we don't wait for the response of last command(0xaa) during unload. Hence while next time loading the driver command time out is seen for INIT command. This problem is resolved by having separate wait condition flag for each command(except scan command). Since scan command is treated differently (by maintaining scan pending q etc.), newly defined flag (scan_wait_q_woken) is used as a scan wait condition. Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Ashok Powar <yogeshp@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c8
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
index ca3761965e85..5456dcbf037c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ int mwifiex_set_user_scan_ioctl(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
{
int status;
- priv->adapter->cmd_wait_q.condition = false;
+ priv->adapter->scan_wait_q_woken = false;
status = mwifiex_scan_networks(priv, scan_req);
if (!status)
@@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ int mwifiex_scan_networks(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
list_del(&cmd_node->list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->scan_pending_q_lock,
flags);
+ adapter->cmd_queued = cmd_node;
mwifiex_insert_cmd_to_pending_q(adapter, cmd_node,
true);
} else {
@@ -1788,7 +1789,7 @@ int mwifiex_ret_802_11_scan(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
/* Need to indicate IOCTL complete */
if (adapter->curr_cmd->wait_q_enabled) {
adapter->cmd_wait_q.status = 0;
- mwifiex_complete_cmd(adapter);
+ mwifiex_complete_cmd(adapter, adapter->curr_cmd);
}
if (priv->report_scan_result)
priv->report_scan_result = false;
@@ -1845,6 +1846,7 @@ mwifiex_queue_scan_cmd(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
unsigned long flags;
cmd_node->wait_q_enabled = true;
+ cmd_node->condition = &adapter->scan_wait_q_woken;
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->scan_pending_q_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&cmd_node->list, &adapter->scan_pending_q);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->scan_pending_q_lock, flags);
@@ -1911,7 +1913,7 @@ int mwifiex_request_scan(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
}
priv->scan_pending_on_block = true;
- priv->adapter->cmd_wait_q.condition = false;
+ priv->adapter->scan_wait_q_woken = false;
if (req_ssid && req_ssid->ssid_len != 0)
/* Specific SSID scan */