summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>2012-10-31 18:54:37 +0400
committerSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>2012-11-20 15:35:16 +0400
commit78a3c5ab1749cb78eb06b581c3c13d8e027bef40 (patch)
tree7b7f49e283b16bdb2ce65496bae88a30a200eb4d /drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
parentf4a75d2eb7b1e2206094b901be09adb31ba63681 (diff)
downloadlinux-78a3c5ab1749cb78eb06b581c3c13d8e027bef40.tar.xz
mfd: twl-core: Fix chip ID for the twl6030-pwm module
The correct chip id is 1 since the PWM module is on address 0x49. With the current TWL6030_MODULE_ID1 the kernel will crash early since we have: #define TWL6030_MODULE_ID1 0x0E and static struct twl_client twl_modules[4]; Down in the stack we try to get the module by: struct twl_client *twl = &twl_modules[chip]; Which is obviously going to do nasty things. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mfd/twl-core.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mfd/twl-core.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
index 4ae642320205..a071a8643a47 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ add_children(struct twl4030_platform_data *pdata, unsigned irq_base,
}
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM_TWL6030) && twl_class_is_6030()) {
- child = add_child(TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, "twl6030-pwm", NULL, 0,
+ child = add_child(SUB_CHIP_ID1, "twl6030-pwm", NULL, 0,
false, 0, 0);
if (IS_ERR(child))
return PTR_ERR(child);