x86/entry: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt()

We do not have tracepoints for sys_modify_ldt() because we define
it directly instead of using the normal SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros.

However, there is a reason sys_modify_ldt() does not use the macros:
it has an 'int' return type instead of 'unsigned long'.  This is
a bug, but it's a bug cemented in the ABI.

What does this mean?  If we return -EINVAL from a function that
returns 'int', we have 0x00000000ffffffea in %rax.  But, if we
return -EINVAL from a function returning 'unsigned long', we end
up with 0xffffffffffffffea in %rax, which is wrong.

To work around this and maintain the 'int' behavior while using
the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros, so we add a cast to 'unsigned int'
in both implementations of sys_modify_ldt().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171018172107.1A79C532@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
index f0e64db18ac8..0402d44deb4d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -294,8 +295,8 @@ out:
 	return error;
 }
 
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
-			      unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+		unsigned long , bytecount)
 {
 	int ret = -ENOSYS;
 
@@ -313,5 +314,14 @@ asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
 		ret = write_ldt(ptr, bytecount, 0);
 		break;
 	}
-	return ret;
+	/*
+	 * The SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros give us an 'unsigned long'
+	 * return type, but tht ABI for sys_modify_ldt() expects
+	 * 'int'.  This cast gives us an int-sized value in %rax
+	 * for the return code.  The 'unsigned' is necessary so
+	 * the compiler does not try to sign-extend the negative
+	 * return codes into the high half of the register when
+	 * taking the value from int->long.
+	 */
+	return (unsigned int)ret;
 }