summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2016-02-24 01:58:52 +0300
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2016-02-24 03:25:20 +0300
commitde9e478b9d49f3a0214310d921450cf5bb4a21e6 (patch)
treec93f837c7541bd021b72a492b2ddd701ef796b3d /arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
parent4de8ebeff8ddefaceeb7fc6a9b1a514fc9624509 (diff)
downloadlinux-de9e478b9d49f3a0214310d921450cf5bb4a21e6.tar.xz
x86: fix SMAP in 32-bit environments
In commit 11f1a4b9755f ("x86: reorganize SMAP handling in user space accesses") I changed how the stac/clac instructions were generated around the user space accesses, which then made it possible to do batched accesses efficiently for user string copies etc. However, in doing so, I completely spaced out, and didn't even think about the 32-bit case. And nobody really even seemed to notice, because SMAP doesn't even exist until modern Skylake processors, and you'd have to be crazy to run 32-bit kernels on a modern CPU. Which brings us to Andy Lutomirski. He actually tested the 32-bit kernel on new hardware, and noticed that it doesn't work. My bad. The trivial fix is to add the required uaccess begin/end markers around the raw accesses in <asm/uaccess_32.h>. I feel a bit bad about this patch, just because that header file really should be cleaned up to avoid all the duplicated code in it, and this commit just expands on the problem. But this just fixes the bug without any bigger cleanup surgery. Reported-and-tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h26
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
index f5dcb5204dcd..3fe0eac59462 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
@@ -48,20 +48,28 @@ __copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
switch (n) {
case 1:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__put_user_size(*(u8 *)from, (u8 __user *)to,
1, ret, 1);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__put_user_size(*(u16 *)from, (u16 __user *)to,
2, ret, 2);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__put_user_size(*(u32 *)from, (u32 __user *)to,
4, ret, 4);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 8:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__put_user_size(*(u64 *)from, (u64 __user *)to,
8, ret, 8);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
}
}
@@ -103,13 +111,19 @@ __copy_from_user_inatomic(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
switch (n) {
case 1:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
}
}
@@ -148,13 +162,19 @@ __copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
switch (n) {
case 1:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
}
}
@@ -170,13 +190,19 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __copy_from_user_nocache(void *to,
switch (n) {
case 1:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
+ __uaccess_begin();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
+ __uaccess_end();
return ret;
}
}