diff options
author | Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> | 2017-03-22 17:55:31 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> | 2017-04-14 02:41:34 +0300 |
commit | 99c88eb244aa6b61cc0c4ca6e6b6b9c7ce00cc53 (patch) | |
tree | 5323eb6fe10bb249b1eee3943a2da0c1f0aa2af5 /COPYING | |
parent | 01c0e0a28da749e80cb7d549f75a5f52e2f40d0e (diff) | |
download | linux-99c88eb244aa6b61cc0c4ca6e6b6b9c7ce00cc53.tar.xz |
power: supply: bq24190_charger: Add support for bq24192i
The bq24192 and bq24192i are mostly identical to the bq24190, TI even
published a single datasheet for all 3 of them. The difference
between the bq24190 and bq24192[i] is the way charger-type detection
is done, the bq24190 is to be directly connected to the USB a/b lines,
where as the the bq24192[i] has a gpio which should be driven high/low
externally depending on the type of charger connected, from a register
level access pov there is no difference.
The differences between the bq24192 and bq24192i are:
1) Lower default charge rate on the bq24192i
2) Pre-charge-current can be max 640 mA on the bq24192i
On x86/ACPI systems the code which instantiates the i2c client may not
know the exact variant being used, so instead of coding the model-id
in the i2c_id struct and bailing if it does not match, check the reported
model-id matches one of the supported variants.
This commit only adds support for the bq24192i as I don't
have a bq24192 to test with, adding support for the bq24192 should
be as simple as also accepting its model-id in the model-id test.
Cc: Liam Breck <kernel@networkimprov.net>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'COPYING')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions