diff options
| author | Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> | 2022-03-24 18:36:45 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2022-04-20 10:34:04 +0300 |
| commit | ec13aa4e0085eba99fab07f9842a27b727cf50cd (patch) | |
| tree | abd02f41b79015c9f9da66d7fb6893934cb634ea | |
| parent | ed0e951463eaffe9f90bff6c2c69f080e9e0ad0a (diff) | |
| download | linux-ec13aa4e0085eba99fab07f9842a27b727cf50cd.tar.xz | |
btrfs: remove unused variable in btrfs_{start,write}_dirty_block_groups()
commit 6d4a6b515c39f1f8763093e0f828959b2fbc2f45 upstream.
Clang's version of -Wunused-but-set-variable recently gained support for
unary operations, which reveals two unused variables:
fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2949:6: error: variable 'num_started' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int num_started = 0;
^
fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3116:6: error: variable 'num_started' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int num_started = 0;
^
2 errors generated.
These variables appear to be unused from their introduction, so just
remove them to silence the warnings.
Fixes: c9dc4c657850 ("Btrfs: two stage dirty block group writeout")
Fixes: 1bbc621ef284 ("Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout outside critical section in commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1614
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index 53ff3db9640e..37418b183b07 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -2882,7 +2882,6 @@ int btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) struct btrfs_path *path = NULL; LIST_HEAD(dirty); struct list_head *io = &cur_trans->io_bgs; - int num_started = 0; int loops = 0; spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock); @@ -2948,7 +2947,6 @@ again: cache->io_ctl.inode = NULL; ret = btrfs_write_out_cache(trans, cache, path); if (ret == 0 && cache->io_ctl.inode) { - num_started++; should_put = 0; /* @@ -3049,7 +3047,6 @@ int btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) int should_put; struct btrfs_path *path; struct list_head *io = &cur_trans->io_bgs; - int num_started = 0; path = btrfs_alloc_path(); if (!path) @@ -3107,7 +3104,6 @@ int btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) cache->io_ctl.inode = NULL; ret = btrfs_write_out_cache(trans, cache, path); if (ret == 0 && cache->io_ctl.inode) { - num_started++; should_put = 0; list_add_tail(&cache->io_list, io); } else { |