From 713274f1f2c896d37017efee333fd44149710119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Mikityanskiy Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:39:50 +0300 Subject: bpf: Fix verifier id tracking of scalars on spill The following scenario describes a bug in the verifier where it incorrectly concludes about equivalent scalar IDs which could lead to verifier bypass in privileged mode: 1. Prepare a 32-bit rogue number. 2. Put the rogue number into the upper half of a 64-bit register, and roll a random (unknown to the verifier) bit in the lower half. The rest of the bits should be zero (although variations are possible). 3. Assign an ID to the register by MOVing it to another arbitrary register. 4. Perform a 32-bit spill of the register, then perform a 32-bit fill to another register. Due to a bug in the verifier, the ID will be preserved, although the new register will contain only the lower 32 bits, i.e. all zeros except one random bit. At this point there are two registers with different values but the same ID, which means the integrity of the verifier state has been corrupted. 5. Compare the new 32-bit register with 0. In the branch where it's equal to 0, the verifier will believe that the original 64-bit register is also 0, because it has the same ID, but its actual value still contains the rogue number in the upper half. Some optimizations of the verifier prevent the actual bypass, so extra care is needed: the comparison must be between two registers, and both branches must be reachable (this is why one random bit is needed). Both branches are still suitable for the bypass. 6. Right shift the original register by 32 bits to pop the rogue number. 7. Use the rogue number as an offset with any pointer. The verifier will believe that the offset is 0, while in reality it's the given number. The fix is similar to the 32-bit BPF_MOV handling in check_alu_op for SCALAR_VALUE. If the spill is narrowing the actual register value, don't keep the ID, make sure it's reset to 0. Fixes: 354e8f1970f8 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill") Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Tested-by: Andrii Nakryiko # Checked veristat delta Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230607123951.558971-2-maxtram95@gmail.com --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5871aa78d01a..0dd8adc7a159 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -3868,6 +3868,9 @@ static int check_stack_write_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return err; } save_register_state(state, spi, reg, size); + /* Break the relation on a narrowing spill. */ + if (fls64(reg->umax_value) > BITS_PER_BYTE * size) + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id = 0; } else if (!reg && !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && is_bpf_st_mem(insn) && insn->imm != 0 && env->bpf_capable) { struct bpf_reg_state fake_reg = {}; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0108a4e9f3584a7a2c026d1601b0682ff7335d95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Krister Johansen Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:44:40 -0700 Subject: bpf: ensure main program has an extable When subprograms are in use, the main program is not jit'd after the subprograms because jit_subprogs sets a value for prog->bpf_func upon success. Subsequent calls to the JIT are bypassed when this value is non-NULL. This leads to a situation where the main program and its func[0] counterpart are both in the bpf kallsyms tree, but only func[0] has an extable. Extables are only created during JIT. Now there are two nearly identical program ksym entries in the tree, but only one has an extable. Depending upon how the entries are placed, there's a chance that a fault will call search_extable on the aux with the NULL entry. Since jit_subprogs already copies state from func[0] to the main program, include the extable pointer in this state duplication. Additionally, ensure that the copy of the main program in func[0] is not added to the bpf_prog_kallsyms table. Instead, let the main program get added later in bpf_prog_load(). This ensures there is only a single copy of the main program in the kallsyms table, and that its tag matches the tag observed by tooling like bpftool. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1c2a088a6626 ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs") Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen Acked-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6de9b2f4b4724ef56efbb0339daaa66c8b68b1e7.1686616663.git.kjlx@templeofstupid.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 0dd8adc7a159..cf5f230360f5 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -17217,9 +17217,10 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } /* finally lock prog and jit images for all functions and - * populate kallsysm + * populate kallsysm. Begin at the first subprogram, since + * bpf_prog_load will add the kallsyms for the main program. */ - for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) { + for (i = 1; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) { bpf_prog_lock_ro(func[i]); bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(func[i]); } @@ -17245,6 +17246,8 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) prog->jited = 1; prog->bpf_func = func[0]->bpf_func; prog->jited_len = func[0]->jited_len; + prog->aux->extable = func[0]->aux->extable; + prog->aux->num_exentries = func[0]->aux->num_exentries; prog->aux->func = func; prog->aux->func_cnt = env->subprog_cnt; bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(prog); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 9724160b3942b0a967b91a59f81da5593f28b8ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florent Revest Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:56:07 +0200 Subject: bpf/btf: Accept function names that contain dots When building a kernel with LLVM=1, LLVM_IAS=0 and CONFIG_KASAN=y, LLVM leaves DWARF tags for the "asan.module_ctor" & co symbols. In turn, pahole creates BTF_KIND_FUNC entries for these and this makes the BTF metadata validation fail because they contain a dot. In a dramatic turn of event, this BTF verification failure can cause the netfilter_bpf initialization to fail, causing netfilter_core to free the netfilter_helper hashmap and netfilter_ftp to trigger a use-after-free. The risk of u-a-f in netfilter will be addressed separately but the existence of "asan.module_ctor" debug info under some build conditions sounds like a good enough reason to accept functions that contain dots in BTF. Although using only LLVM=1 is the recommended way to compile clang-based kernels, users can certainly do LLVM=1, LLVM_IAS=0 as well and we still try to support that combination according to Nick. To clarify: - > v5.10 kernel, LLVM=1 (LLVM_IAS=0 is not the default) is recommended, but user can still have LLVM=1, LLVM_IAS=0 to trigger the issue - <= 5.10 kernel, LLVM=1 (LLVM_IAS=0 is the default) is recommended in which case GNU as will be used Fixes: 1dc92851849c ("bpf: kernel side support for BTF Var and DataSec") Signed-off-by: Florent Revest Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Yonghong Song Cc: Nick Desaulniers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230615145607.3469985-1-revest@chromium.org --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 20 ++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index 6b682b8e4b50..72b32b7cd9cd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -744,13 +744,12 @@ static bool btf_name_offset_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset) return offset < btf->hdr.str_len; } -static bool __btf_name_char_ok(char c, bool first, bool dot_ok) +static bool __btf_name_char_ok(char c, bool first) { if ((first ? !isalpha(c) : !isalnum(c)) && c != '_' && - ((c == '.' && !dot_ok) || - c != '.')) + c != '.') return false; return true; } @@ -767,20 +766,20 @@ static const char *btf_str_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset) return NULL; } -static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset, bool dot_ok) +static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset) { /* offset must be valid */ const char *src = btf_str_by_offset(btf, offset); const char *src_limit; - if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, true, dot_ok)) + if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, true)) return false; /* set a limit on identifier length */ src_limit = src + KSYM_NAME_LEN; src++; while (*src && src < src_limit) { - if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, false, dot_ok)) + if (!__btf_name_char_ok(*src, false)) return false; src++; } @@ -788,17 +787,14 @@ static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset, bool dot_ok) return !*src; } -/* Only C-style identifier is permitted. This can be relaxed if - * necessary. - */ static bool btf_name_valid_identifier(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset) { - return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset, false); + return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset); } static bool btf_name_valid_section(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset) { - return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset, true); + return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset); } static const char *__btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset) @@ -4422,7 +4418,7 @@ static s32 btf_var_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env, } if (!t->name_off || - !__btf_name_valid(env->btf, t->name_off, true)) { + !__btf_name_valid(env->btf, t->name_off)) { btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Invalid name"); return -EINVAL; } -- cgit v1.2.3 From db8eae6bc5c702d8e3ab2d0c6bb5976c131576eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 15:14:14 +0200 Subject: bpf: Force kprobe multi expected_attach_type for kprobe_multi link We currently allow to create perf link for program with expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI. This will cause crash when we call helpers like get_attach_cookie or get_func_ip in such program, because it will call the kprobe_multi's version (current->bpf_ctx context setup) of those helpers while it expects perf_link's current->bpf_ctx context setup. Making sure that we use BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI expected_attach_type only for programs attaching through kprobe_multi link. Fixes: ca74823c6e16 ("bpf: Add cookie support to programs attached with kprobe multi link") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230618131414.75649-1-jolsa@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 0c21d0d8efe4..f1c8733f76b8 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -3440,6 +3440,11 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog, return prog->enforce_expected_attach_type && prog->expected_attach_type != attach_type ? -EINVAL : 0; + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE: + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI && + attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; default: return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3