From eade1fe75fd3ad89c10d011969c0eed8f13e28e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yaowei Bai Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:52:18 +0800 Subject: ceph: remove unused functions in ceph_frag.h These functions were introduced in commit 3d14c5d2b ("ceph: factor out libceph from Ceph file system"). Howover, there's no user of these functions since then, so remove them for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng --- include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h | 35 ----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 35 deletions(-) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h index 5babb8e95352..970ba5cb1409 100644 --- a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h +++ b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h @@ -44,42 +44,7 @@ static inline int ceph_frag_contains_value(__u32 f, __u32 v) { return (v & ceph_frag_mask(f)) == ceph_frag_value(f); } -static inline int ceph_frag_contains_frag(__u32 f, __u32 sub) -{ - /* is sub as specific as us, and contained by us? */ - return ceph_frag_bits(sub) >= ceph_frag_bits(f) && - (ceph_frag_value(sub) & ceph_frag_mask(f)) == ceph_frag_value(f); -} -static inline __u32 ceph_frag_parent(__u32 f) -{ - return ceph_frag_make(ceph_frag_bits(f) - 1, - ceph_frag_value(f) & (ceph_frag_mask(f) << 1)); -} -static inline int ceph_frag_is_left_child(__u32 f) -{ - return ceph_frag_bits(f) > 0 && - (ceph_frag_value(f) & (0x1000000 >> ceph_frag_bits(f))) == 0; -} -static inline int ceph_frag_is_right_child(__u32 f) -{ - return ceph_frag_bits(f) > 0 && - (ceph_frag_value(f) & (0x1000000 >> ceph_frag_bits(f))) == 1; -} -static inline __u32 ceph_frag_sibling(__u32 f) -{ - return ceph_frag_make(ceph_frag_bits(f), - ceph_frag_value(f) ^ (0x1000000 >> ceph_frag_bits(f))); -} -static inline __u32 ceph_frag_left_child(__u32 f) -{ - return ceph_frag_make(ceph_frag_bits(f)+1, ceph_frag_value(f)); -} -static inline __u32 ceph_frag_right_child(__u32 f) -{ - return ceph_frag_make(ceph_frag_bits(f)+1, - ceph_frag_value(f) | (0x1000000 >> (1+ceph_frag_bits(f)))); -} static inline __u32 ceph_frag_make_child(__u32 f, int by, int i) { int newbits = ceph_frag_bits(f) + by; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 79a3ed2e98557a2844e75c203e742f9c229ad1d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yaowei Bai Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:52:19 +0800 Subject: ceph: ceph_frag_contains_value can be boolean This patch makes ceph_frag_contains_value return bool to improve readability due to this particular function only using either one or zero as its return value. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng --- include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h index 970ba5cb1409..b827e066e55a 100644 --- a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h +++ b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static inline __u32 ceph_frag_mask_shift(__u32 f) return 24 - ceph_frag_bits(f); } -static inline int ceph_frag_contains_value(__u32 f, __u32 v) +static inline bool ceph_frag_contains_value(__u32 f, __u32 v) { return (v & ceph_frag_mask(f)) == ceph_frag_value(f); } -- cgit v1.2.3 From 67645d7619738e51c668ca69f097cb90b5470422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Dryomov Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 13:18:34 +0300 Subject: libceph: fix ceph_msg_revoke() There are a number of problems with revoking a "was sending" message: (1) We never make any attempt to revoke data - only kvecs contibute to con->out_skip. However, once the header (envelope) is written to the socket, our peer learns data_len and sets itself to expect at least data_len bytes to follow front or front+middle. If ceph_msg_revoke() is called while the messenger is sending message's data portion, anything we send after that call is counted by the OSD towards the now revoked message's data portion. The effects vary, the most common one is the eventual hang - higher layers get stuck waiting for the reply to the message that was sent out after ceph_msg_revoke() returned and treated by the OSD as a bunch of data bytes. This is what Matt ran into. (2) Flat out zeroing con->out_kvec_bytes worth of bytes to handle kvecs is wrong. If ceph_msg_revoke() is called before the tag is sent out or while the messenger is sending the header, we will get a connection reset, either due to a bad tag (0 is not a valid tag) or a bad header CRC, which kind of defeats the purpose of revoke. Currently the kernel client refuses to work with header CRCs disabled, but that will likely change in the future, making this even worse. (3) con->out_skip is not reset on connection reset, leading to one or more spurious connection resets if we happen to get a real one between con->out_skip is set in ceph_msg_revoke() and before it's cleared in write_partial_skip(). Fixing (1) and (3) is trivial. The idea behind fixing (2) is to never zero the tag or the header, i.e. send out tag+header regardless of when ceph_msg_revoke() is called. That way the header is always correct, no unnecessary resets are induced and revoke stands ready for disabled CRCs. Since ceph_msg_revoke() rips out con->out_msg, introduce a new "message out temp" and copy the header into it before sending. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0+ Reported-by: Matt Conner Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Tested-by: Matt Conner Reviewed-by: Sage Weil --- include/linux/ceph/messenger.h | 2 +- net/ceph/messenger.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h index 71b1d6cdcb5d..8dbd7879fdc6 100644 --- a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h +++ b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ struct ceph_connection { struct ceph_entity_addr actual_peer_addr; /* message out temps */ + struct ceph_msg_header out_hdr; struct ceph_msg *out_msg; /* sending message (== tail of out_sent) */ bool out_msg_done; @@ -229,7 +230,6 @@ struct ceph_connection { int out_kvec_left; /* kvec's left in out_kvec */ int out_skip; /* skip this many bytes */ int out_kvec_bytes; /* total bytes left */ - bool out_kvec_is_msg; /* kvec refers to out_msg */ int out_more; /* there is more data after the kvecs */ __le64 out_temp_ack; /* for writing an ack */ struct ceph_timespec out_temp_keepalive2; /* for writing keepalive2 diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c index de3eb19a6968..3850d1a5bd7c 100644 --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c @@ -669,6 +669,8 @@ static void reset_connection(struct ceph_connection *con) } con->in_seq = 0; con->in_seq_acked = 0; + + con->out_skip = 0; } /* @@ -768,6 +770,8 @@ static u32 get_global_seq(struct ceph_messenger *msgr, u32 gt) static void con_out_kvec_reset(struct ceph_connection *con) { + BUG_ON(con->out_skip); + con->out_kvec_left = 0; con->out_kvec_bytes = 0; con->out_kvec_cur = &con->out_kvec[0]; @@ -776,9 +780,9 @@ static void con_out_kvec_reset(struct ceph_connection *con) static void con_out_kvec_add(struct ceph_connection *con, size_t size, void *data) { - int index; + int index = con->out_kvec_left; - index = con->out_kvec_left; + BUG_ON(con->out_skip); BUG_ON(index >= ARRAY_SIZE(con->out_kvec)); con->out_kvec[index].iov_len = size; @@ -787,6 +791,27 @@ static void con_out_kvec_add(struct ceph_connection *con, con->out_kvec_bytes += size; } +/* + * Chop off a kvec from the end. Return residual number of bytes for + * that kvec, i.e. how many bytes would have been written if the kvec + * hadn't been nuked. + */ +static int con_out_kvec_skip(struct ceph_connection *con) +{ + int off = con->out_kvec_cur - con->out_kvec; + int skip = 0; + + if (con->out_kvec_bytes > 0) { + skip = con->out_kvec[off + con->out_kvec_left - 1].iov_len; + BUG_ON(con->out_kvec_bytes < skip); + BUG_ON(!con->out_kvec_left); + con->out_kvec_bytes -= skip; + con->out_kvec_left--; + } + + return skip; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK /* @@ -1194,7 +1219,6 @@ static void prepare_write_message_footer(struct ceph_connection *con) m->footer.flags |= CEPH_MSG_FOOTER_COMPLETE; dout("prepare_write_message_footer %p\n", con); - con->out_kvec_is_msg = true; con->out_kvec[v].iov_base = &m->footer; if (con->peer_features & CEPH_FEATURE_MSG_AUTH) { if (con->ops->sign_message) @@ -1222,7 +1246,6 @@ static void prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con) u32 crc; con_out_kvec_reset(con); - con->out_kvec_is_msg = true; con->out_msg_done = false; /* Sneak an ack in there first? If we can get it into the same @@ -1262,18 +1285,19 @@ static void prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con) /* tag + hdr + front + middle */ con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof (tag_msg), &tag_msg); - con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof (m->hdr), &m->hdr); + con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof(con->out_hdr), &con->out_hdr); con_out_kvec_add(con, m->front.iov_len, m->front.iov_base); if (m->middle) con_out_kvec_add(con, m->middle->vec.iov_len, m->middle->vec.iov_base); - /* fill in crc (except data pages), footer */ + /* fill in hdr crc and finalize hdr */ crc = crc32c(0, &m->hdr, offsetof(struct ceph_msg_header, crc)); con->out_msg->hdr.crc = cpu_to_le32(crc); - con->out_msg->footer.flags = 0; + memcpy(&con->out_hdr, &con->out_msg->hdr, sizeof(con->out_hdr)); + /* fill in front and middle crc, footer */ crc = crc32c(0, m->front.iov_base, m->front.iov_len); con->out_msg->footer.front_crc = cpu_to_le32(crc); if (m->middle) { @@ -1285,6 +1309,7 @@ static void prepare_write_message(struct ceph_connection *con) dout("%s front_crc %u middle_crc %u\n", __func__, le32_to_cpu(con->out_msg->footer.front_crc), le32_to_cpu(con->out_msg->footer.middle_crc)); + con->out_msg->footer.flags = 0; /* is there a data payload? */ con->out_msg->footer.data_crc = 0; @@ -1489,7 +1514,6 @@ static int write_partial_kvec(struct ceph_connection *con) } } con->out_kvec_left = 0; - con->out_kvec_is_msg = false; ret = 1; out: dout("write_partial_kvec %p %d left in %d kvecs ret = %d\n", con, @@ -1581,6 +1605,7 @@ static int write_partial_skip(struct ceph_connection *con) { int ret; + dout("%s %p %d left\n", __func__, con, con->out_skip); while (con->out_skip > 0) { size_t size = min(con->out_skip, (int) PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); @@ -2503,13 +2528,13 @@ more: more_kvec: /* kvec data queued? */ - if (con->out_skip) { - ret = write_partial_skip(con); + if (con->out_kvec_left) { + ret = write_partial_kvec(con); if (ret <= 0) goto out; } - if (con->out_kvec_left) { - ret = write_partial_kvec(con); + if (con->out_skip) { + ret = write_partial_skip(con); if (ret <= 0) goto out; } @@ -3047,16 +3072,31 @@ void ceph_msg_revoke(struct ceph_msg *msg) ceph_msg_put(msg); } if (con->out_msg == msg) { - dout("%s %p msg %p - was sending\n", __func__, con, msg); - con->out_msg = NULL; - if (con->out_kvec_is_msg) { - con->out_skip = con->out_kvec_bytes; - con->out_kvec_is_msg = false; + BUG_ON(con->out_skip); + /* footer */ + if (con->out_msg_done) { + con->out_skip += con_out_kvec_skip(con); + } else { + BUG_ON(!msg->data_length); + if (con->peer_features & CEPH_FEATURE_MSG_AUTH) + con->out_skip += sizeof(msg->footer); + else + con->out_skip += sizeof(msg->old_footer); } + /* data, middle, front */ + if (msg->data_length) + con->out_skip += msg->cursor.total_resid; + if (msg->middle) + con->out_skip += con_out_kvec_skip(con); + con->out_skip += con_out_kvec_skip(con); + + dout("%s %p msg %p - was sending, will write %d skip %d\n", + __func__, con, msg, con->out_kvec_bytes, con->out_skip); msg->hdr.seq = 0; - + con->out_msg = NULL; ceph_msg_put(msg); } + mutex_unlock(&con->mutex); } -- cgit v1.2.3