From 95989c46d2a156365867b1d795fdefce71bce378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Foster Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:23:07 -0700 Subject: xfs: fix spurious spin_is_locked() assert failures on non-smp kernels The 0-day kernel test robot reports assertion failures on !CONFIG_SMP kernels due to failed spin_is_locked() checks. As it turns out, spin_is_locked() is hardcoded to return zero on !CONFIG_SMP kernels and so this function cannot be relied on to verify spinlock state in this configuration. To avoid this problem, replace the associated asserts with lockdep variants that do the right thing regardless of kernel configuration. Drop the one assert that checks for an unlocked lock as there is no suitable lockdep variant for that case. This moves the spinlock checks from XFS debug code to lockdep, but generally provides the same level of protection. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Brian Foster Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong --- fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c') diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c index f61c84f8e31a..990210fcb9c3 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ xfs_inode_alloc( XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_active); ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) == 0); - ASSERT(!spin_is_locked(&ip->i_flags_lock)); ASSERT(!xfs_isiflocked(ip)); ASSERT(ip->i_ino == 0); @@ -190,7 +189,7 @@ xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag( { struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount; - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pag->pag_ici_lock); if (pag->pag_ici_reclaimable++) return; @@ -212,7 +211,7 @@ xfs_perag_clear_reclaim_tag( { struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount; - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pag->pag_ici_lock); if (--pag->pag_ici_reclaimable) return; -- cgit v1.2.3