From 58a69cb47ec6991bf006a3e5d202e8571b0327a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:25:31 +0100
Subject: workqueue, freezer: unify spelling of 'freeze' + 'able' to
 'freezable'

There are two spellings in use for 'freeze' + 'able' - 'freezable' and
'freezeable'.  The former is the more prominent one.  The latter is
mostly used by workqueue and in a few other odd places.  Unify the
spelling to 'freezable'.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
---
 fs/gfs2/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs/gfs2/main.c')

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/main.c b/fs/gfs2/main.c
index ebef7ab6e17e..85ba027d1c4d 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/main.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/main.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int __init init_gfs2_fs(void)
 
 	error = -ENOMEM;
 	gfs_recovery_wq = alloc_workqueue("gfs_recovery",
-					  WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_FREEZEABLE, 0);
+					  WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);
 	if (!gfs_recovery_wq)
 		goto fail_wq;
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3