From ed738ba7f96170384f3e94a38be5536560eabc00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:38:42 -0400 Subject: btrfs: check worker before need_preemptive_reclaim need_preemptive_reclaim() does some calculations, which aren't heavy, but if we're already running preemptive reclaim there's no reason to do them at all, so re-order the checks so that we don't do the calculation if we're already doing reclaim. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/space-info.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c index 2dc674b7c3b1..c9a5e003bcfa 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c @@ -1588,8 +1588,8 @@ static int __reserve_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, * the async reclaim as we will panic. */ if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags) && - need_preemptive_reclaim(fs_info, space_info) && - !work_busy(&fs_info->preempt_reclaim_work)) { + !work_busy(&fs_info->preempt_reclaim_work) && + need_preemptive_reclaim(fs_info, space_info)) { trace_btrfs_trigger_flush(fs_info, space_info->flags, orig_bytes, flush, "preempt"); queue_work(system_unbound_wq, -- cgit v1.2.3