From 4eed4d8ff984abcb983ada5b3dbf56fce35f1068 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:48:55 +0200
Subject: 3c59x: Fix shared IRQ handling
As its first order of business, boomerang_interrupt() checks whether
the device really has any pending interrupts. If it does not,
it does nothing and returns, but it still returns IRQ_HANDLED.
This is wrong: interrupt was not handled, IRQ handlers of other
devices sharing this IRQ line need to be called.
vortex_interrupt() has it right: it returns IRQ_NONE in this case
via IRQ_RETVAL(0).
Do the same in boomerang_interrupt().
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
(limited to 'drivers/net')
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c
index 41095ebad97f..2d1ce3c5d0dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c
@@ -2382,6 +2382,7 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
void __iomem *ioaddr;
int status;
int work_done = max_interrupt_work;
+ int handled = 0;
ioaddr = vp->ioaddr;
@@ -2400,6 +2401,7 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
if ((status & IntLatch) == 0)
goto handler_exit; /* No interrupt: shared IRQs can cause this */
+ handled = 1;
if (status == 0xffff) { /* h/w no longer present (hotplug)? */
if (vortex_debug > 1)
@@ -2501,7 +2503,7 @@ boomerang_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
handler_exit:
vp->handling_irq = 0;
spin_unlock(&vp->lock);
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
+ return IRQ_RETVAL(handled);
}
static int vortex_rx(struct net_device *dev)
--
cgit v1.2.3