From fb8ddf24c71dc97d6b07ecb7791b4fa5e7f48efc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pu Lehui Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 12:27:36 +0800 Subject: bpf, docs: Remove deprecated xsk libbpf APIs description Since xsk APIs has been removed from libbpf, let's clean up the BPF docs simutaneously. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220708042736.669132-1-pulehui@huawei.com --- Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation/bpf/libbpf') diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst b/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst index f86360f734a8..c5ac97f3d4c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst +++ b/Documentation/bpf/libbpf/libbpf_naming_convention.rst @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ described here. It's recommended to follow these conventions whenever a new function or type is added to keep libbpf API clean and consistent. All types and functions provided by libbpf API should have one of the -following prefixes: ``bpf_``, ``btf_``, ``libbpf_``, ``xsk_``, -``btf_dump_``, ``ring_buffer_``, ``perf_buffer_``. +following prefixes: ``bpf_``, ``btf_``, ``libbpf_``, ``btf_dump_``, +``ring_buffer_``, ``perf_buffer_``. System call wrappers -------------------- @@ -59,15 +59,6 @@ Auxiliary functions and types that don't fit well in any of categories described above should have ``libbpf_`` prefix, e.g. ``libbpf_get_error`` or ``libbpf_prog_type_by_name``. -AF_XDP functions -------------------- - -AF_XDP functions should have an ``xsk_`` prefix, e.g. -``xsk_umem__get_data`` or ``xsk_umem__create``. The interface consists -of both low-level ring access functions and high-level configuration -functions. These can be mixed and matched. Note that these functions -are not reentrant for performance reasons. - ABI --- -- cgit v1.2.3