summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-10-26selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_reloc_mods on big-endian machinesIlya Leoshkevich1-0/+9
This is the same as commit d164dd9a5c08 ("selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machines"), but for test_core_reloc_mods. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-7-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-23selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG typedef example in tag.cYonghong Song1-2/+7
Change value type in progs/tag.c to a typedef with a btf_decl_tag. With `bpftool btf dump file tag.o`, we have ... [14] TYPEDEF 'value_t' type_id=17 [15] DECL_TAG 'tag1' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [16] DECL_TAG 'tag2' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [17] STRUCT '(anon)' size=8 vlen=2 'a' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 'b' type_id=2 bits_offset=32 ... The btf_tag selftest also succeeded: $ ./test_progs -t tag #21 btf_tag:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021195643.4020315-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-10-23selftests/bpf: Make perf_buffer selftests work on 4.9 kernel againAndrii Nakryiko1-2/+18
Recent change to use tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep for perf_buffer selftests causes this selftest to fail on 4.9 kernel in libbpf CI ([0]): libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to perf_event FD 6: Invalid argument libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to tracepoint 'syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep': Invalid argument It's not exactly clear why, because perf_event itself is created for this tracepoint, but I can't even compile 4.9 kernel locally, so it's hard to figure this out. If anyone has better luck and would like to help investigating this, I'd really appreciate this. For now, unblock CI by switching back to raw_syscalls/sys_enter, but reduce amount of unnecessary samples emitted by filter by process ID. Use explicit ARRAY map for that to make it work on 4.9 as well, because global data isn't yet supported there. Fixes: aa274f98b269 ("selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022201342.3490692-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Demonstrate use of custom .rodata/.data sectionsAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+18
Enhance existing selftests to demonstrate the use of custom .data/.rodata sections. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021014404.2635234-9-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Use nanosleep tracepoint in perf buffer testJiri Olsa1-1/+1
The perf buffer tests triggers trace with nanosleep syscall, but monitors all syscalls, which results in lot of data in the buffer and makes it harder to debug. Let's lower the trace traffic and monitor just nanosleep syscall. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-4-jolsa@kernel.org
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Test bpf_skc_to_unix_sock() helperHengqi Chen1-0/+40
Add a new test which triggers unix_listen kernel function to test bpf_skc_to_unix_sock helper. Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021134752.1223426-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
2021-10-19bpf: Rename BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAGYonghong Song1-3/+3
Patch set [1] introduced BTF_KIND_TAG to allow tagging declarations for struct/union, struct/union field, var, func and func arguments and these tags will be encoded into dwarf. They are also encoded to btf by llvm for the bpf target. After BTF_KIND_TAG is introduced, we intended to use it for kernel __user attributes. But kernel __user is actually a type attribute. Upstream and internal discussion showed it is not a good idea to mix declaration attribute and type attribute. So we proposed to introduce btf_type_tag as a type attribute and existing btf_tag renamed to btf_decl_tag ([2]). This patch renamed BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG and some other declarations with *_tag to *_decl_tag to make it clear the tag is for declaration. In the future, BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG might be introduced per [3]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223004.244411-1-yhs@fb.com/ [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111588 [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199 Fixes: b5ea834dde6b ("bpf: Support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG") Fixes: 5b84bd10363e ("libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG") Fixes: 5c07f2fec003 ("bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012164838.3345699-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-10-09selftests/bpf: Fix pid check in fexit_sleep testYucong Sun1-2/+2
bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() returns u64, whose upper 32 bits are the same as userspace getpid() return value. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-13-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-09selftests/bpf: Adding pid filtering for atomics testYucong Sun1-0/+16
This make atomics test able to run in parallel with other tests. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-11-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-09selftests/bpf: Make cgroup_v1v2 use its own portYucong Sun1-1/+1
This patch change cgroup_v1v2 use a different port, avoid conflict with other tests. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-8-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-09selftests/bpf: Fix race condition in enable_statsYucong Sun1-1/+1
In parallel execution mode, this test now need to use atomic operation to avoid race condition. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-7-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08bpf/selftests: Add test for writable bare tracepointHou Tao1-0/+14
Add a writable bare tracepoint in bpf_testmod module, and trigger its calling when reading /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod with a specific buffer length. The reading will return the value in writable context if the early return flag is enabled in writable context. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211004094857.30868-4-hotforest@gmail.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Fix btf_dump test under new clangYucong Sun4-9/+9
New clang version changed ([0]) type name in dwarf from "long int" to "long", this is causing btf_dump tests to fail. [0] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f6a561c4d6754b13165a49990e8365d819f64c86 Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211008173139.1457407-1-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-08selftests/bpf: Remove SEC("version") from test progsDave Marchevsky40-61/+0
Since commit 6c4fc209fcf9d ("bpf: remove useless version check for prog load") these "version" sections, which result in bpf_attr.kern_version being set, have been unnecessary. Remove them so that it's obvious to folks using selftests as a guide that "modern" BPF progs don't need this section. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007231234.2223081-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
2021-10-06selftest/bpf: Switch recursion test to use htab_map_delete_elemJiri Olsa1-6/+3
Currently the recursion test is hooking __htab_map_lookup_elem function, which is invoked both from bpf_prog and bpf syscall. But in our kernel build, the __htab_map_lookup_elem gets inlined within the htab_map_lookup_elem, so it's not trigered and the test fails. Fixing this by using htab_map_delete_elem, which is not inlined for bpf_prog calls (like htab_map_lookup_elem is) and is used directly as pointer for map_delete_elem, so it won't disappear by inlining. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YVnfFTL/3T6jOwHI@krava
2021-10-06bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc supportKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-11/+35
This adds selftests that tests the success and failure path for modules kfuncs (in presence of invalid kfunc calls) for both libbpf and gen_loader. It also adds a prog_test kfunc_btf_id_list so that we can add module BTF ID set from bpf_testmod. This also introduces a couple of test cases to verifier selftests for validating whether we get an error or not depending on if invalid kfunc call remains after elimination of unreachable instructions. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211002011757.311265-10-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-02selftests/bpf: Use BTF-defined key/value for map definitionsHengqi Chen13-40/+38
Change map definitions in BPF selftests to use BTF-defined key/value types. This unifies the map definitions and ensures libbpf won't emit warning about retrying map creation. Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210930161456.3444544-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
2021-09-29selftests/bpf: Fix probe_user test failure with clang build kernelYonghong Song1-2/+26
clang build kernel failed the selftest probe_user. $ ./test_progs -t probe_user $ ... $ test_probe_user:PASS:get_kprobe_res 0 nsec $ test_probe_user:FAIL:check_kprobe_res wrong kprobe res from probe read: 0.0.0.0:0 $ #94 probe_user:FAIL The test attached to kernel function __sys_connect(). In net/socket.c, we have int __sys_connect(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *uservaddr, int addrlen) { ...... } ... SYSCALL_DEFINE3(connect, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, uservaddr, int, addrlen) { return __sys_connect(fd, uservaddr, addrlen); } The gcc compiler (8.5.0) does not inline __sys_connect() in syscall entry function. But latest clang trunk did the inlining. So the bpf program is not triggered. To make the test more reliable, let us kprobe the syscall entry function instead. Note that x86_64, arm64 and s390 have syscall wrappers and they have to be handled specially. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210929033000.3711921-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Switch sk_lookup selftests to strict SEC("sk_lookup") useAndrii Nakryiko1-19/+19
Update "sk_lookup/" definition to be a stand-alone type specifier, with backwards-compatible prefix match logic in non-libbpf-1.0 mode. Currently in selftests all the "sk_lookup/<whatever>" uses just use <whatever> for duplicated unique name encoding, which is redundant as BPF program's name (C function name) uniquely and descriptively identifies the intended use for such BPF programs. With libbpf's SEC_DEF("sk_lookup") definition updated, switch existing sk_lookup programs to use "unqualified" SEC("sk_lookup") section names, with no random text after it. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-11-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Normalize all the rest SEC() usesAndrii Nakryiko10-18/+16
Normalize all the other non-conforming SEC() usages across all selftests. This is in preparation for libbpf to start to enforce stricter SEC() rules in libbpf 1.0 mode. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-5-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Switch SEC("classifier*") usage to a strict SEC("tc")Andrii Nakryiko35-113/+100
Convert all SEC("classifier*") uses to a new and strict SEC("tc") section name. In reference_tracking selftests switch from ambiguous searching by program title (section name) to non-ambiguous searching by name in some selftests, getting closer to completely removing bpf_object__find_program_by_title(). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-4-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-28selftests/bpf: Normalize XDP section names in selftestsAndrii Nakryiko14-21/+19
Convert almost all SEC("xdp_blah") uses to strict SEC("xdp") to comply with strict libbpf 1.0 logic of exact section name match for XDP program types. There is only one exception, which is only tested through iproute2 and defines multiple XDP programs within the same BPF object. Given iproute2 still works in non-strict libbpf mode and it doesn't have means to specify XDP programs by its name (not section name/title), leave that single file alone for now until iproute2 gains lookup by function/program name. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-3-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-26bpf: selftest: A bpf prog that has a 32bit scalar spillMartin KaFai Lau1-0/+365
It is a simplified example that can trigger a 32bit scalar spill. The const scalar is refilled and added to a skb->data later. Since the reg state of the 32bit scalar spill is not saved now, adding the refilled reg to skb->data and then comparing it with skb->data_end cannot verify the skb->data access. With the earlier verifier patch and the llvm patch [1]. The verifier can correctly verify the bpf prog. Here is the snippet of the verifier log that leads to verifier conclusion that the packet data is unsafe to read. The log is from the kerne without the previous verifier patch to save the <8-byte scalar spill. 67: R0=inv1 R1=inv17 R2=invP2 R3=inv1 R4=pkt(id=0,off=68,r=102,imm=0) R5=inv102 R6=pkt(id=0,off=62,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 67: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -12) = r5 68: R0=inv1 R1=inv17 R2=invP2 R3=inv1 R4=pkt(id=0,off=68,r=102,imm=0) R5=inv102 R6=pkt(id=0,off=62,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmm???? ... 101: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 101: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -12) 102: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 102: (bc) w1 = w1 103: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=102,imm=0) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 103: (0f) r7 += r1 last_idx 103 first_idx 67 regs=2 stack=0 before 102: (bc) w1 = w1 regs=2 stack=0 before 101: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -12) 104: R0_w=map_value_or_null(id=2,off=0,ks=16,vs=1,imm=0) R1_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7_w=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=inv17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm ... 127: R0_w=inv1 R1=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9_w=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 127: (bf) r1 = r7 128: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9_w=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 128: (07) r1 += 8 129: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9_w=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 129: (b4) w0 = 1 130: R0=inv1 R1=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 130: (2d) if r1 > r8 goto pc-66 R0=inv1 R1=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 131: R0=inv1 R1=pkt(id=3,off=8,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6=pkt(id=0,off=70,r=102,imm=0) R7=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9=invP17 R10=fp0 fp-16=mmmmmmmm 131: (69) r6 = *(u16 *)(r7 +0) invalid access to packet, off=0 size=2, R7(id=3,off=0,r=0) R7 offset is outside of the packet [1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109073 Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210922004947.626286-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-09-18selftests/bpf: Add trace_vprintk test progDave Marchevsky1-0/+33
This commit adds a test prog for vprintk which confirms that: * bpf_trace_vprintk is writing to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe * __bpf_vprintk macro works as expected * >3 args are printed * bpf_printk w/ 0 format args compiles * bpf_trace_vprintk call w/ a fmt specifier but NULL fmt data fails Approach and code are borrowed from trace_printk test. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210917182911.2426606-9-davemarchevsky@fb.com
2021-09-17Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski5-9/+132
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2021-09-17 We've added 63 non-merge commits during the last 12 day(s) which contain a total of 65 files changed, 2653 insertions(+), 751 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Streamline internal BPF program sections handling and bpf_program__set_attach_target() in libbpf, from Andrii. 2) Add support for new btf kind BTF_KIND_TAG, from Yonghong. 3) Introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot() to capture LBR, from Song. 4) IMUL optimization for x86-64 JIT, from Jie. 5) xsk selftest improvements, from Magnus. 6) Introduce legacy kprobe events support in libbpf, from Rafael. 7) Access hw timestamp through BPF's __sk_buff, from Vadim. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (63 commits) selftests/bpf: Fix a few compiler warnings libbpf: Constify all high-level program attach APIs libbpf: Schedule open_opts.attach_prog_fd deprecation since v0.7 selftests/bpf: Switch fexit_bpf2bpf selftest to set_attach_target() API libbpf: Allow skipping attach_func_name in bpf_program__set_attach_target() libbpf: Deprecated bpf_object_open_opts.relaxed_core_relocs selftests/bpf: Stop using relaxed_core_relocs which has no effect libbpf: Use pre-setup sec_def in libbpf_find_attach_btf_id() bpf: Update bpf_get_smp_processor_id() documentation libbpf: Add sphinx code documentation comments selftests/bpf: Skip btf_tag test if btf_tag attribute not supported docs/bpf: Add documentation for BTF_KIND_TAG selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf program with btf_tag attributes selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_TAG for deduplication selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_TAG unit tests selftests/bpf: Change NAME_NTH/IS_NAME_NTH for BTF_KIND_TAG format selftests/bpf: Test libbpf API function btf__add_tag() bpftool: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG libbpf: Add support for BTF_KIND_TAG libbpf: Rename btf_{hash,equal}_int to btf_{hash,equal}_int_tag ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210917173738.3397064-1-ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-09-15selftests/bpf: Skip btf_tag test if btf_tag attribute not supportedYonghong Song1-1/+11
Commit c240ba287890 ("selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf program with btf_tag attributes") added btf_tag selftest to test BTF_KIND_TAG generation from C source code, and to test kernel validation of generated BTF types. But if an old clang (clang 13 or earlier) is used, the following compiler warning may be seen: progs/tag.c:23:20: warning: unknown attribute 'btf_tag' ignored and the test itself is marked OK. The compiler warning is bad and the test itself shouldn't be marked OK. This patch added the check for btf_tag attribute support. If btf_tag is not supported by the clang, the attribute will not be used in the code and the test will be marked as skipped. For example, with clang 13: ./test_progs -t btf_tag #21 btf_tag:SKIP Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED The selftests/README.rst is updated to clarify when the btf_tag test may be skipped. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210915061036.2577971-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-09-15selftests/bpf: Add a test with a bpf program with btf_tag attributesYonghong Song1-0/+39
Add a bpf program with btf_tag attributes. The program is loaded successfully with the kernel. With the command bpftool btf dump file ./tag.o the following dump shows that tags are properly encoded: [8] STRUCT 'key_t' size=12 vlen=3 'a' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 'b' type_id=2 bits_offset=32 'c' type_id=2 bits_offset=64 [9] TAG 'tag1' type_id=8 component_id=-1 [10] TAG 'tag2' type_id=8 component_id=-1 [11] TAG 'tag1' type_id=8 component_id=1 [12] TAG 'tag2' type_id=8 component_id=1 ... [21] FUNC_PROTO '(anon)' ret_type_id=2 vlen=1 'x' type_id=2 [22] FUNC 'foo' type_id=21 linkage=static [23] TAG 'tag1' type_id=22 component_id=0 [24] TAG 'tag2' type_id=22 component_id=0 [25] TAG 'tag1' type_id=22 component_id=-1 [26] TAG 'tag2' type_id=22 component_id=-1 ... [29] VAR 'total' type_id=27, linkage=global [30] TAG 'tag1' type_id=29 component_id=-1 [31] TAG 'tag2' type_id=29 component_id=-1 If an old clang compiler, which does not support btf_tag attribute, is used, these btf_tag attributes will be silently ignored. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914223058.248949-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-09-15selftests/bpf: Update selftests to always provide "struct_ops" SECAndrii Nakryiko1-9/+3
Update struct_ops selftests to always specify "struct_ops" section prefix. Libbpf will require a proper BPF program type set in the next patch, so this prevents tests breaking. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914014733.2768-2-andrii@kernel.org
2021-09-14bpf, selftests: Add test case for mixed cgroup v1/v2Daniel Borkmann1-0/+26
Minimal selftest which implements a small BPF policy program to the connect(2) hook which rejects TCP connection requests to port 60123 with EPERM. This is being attached to a non-root cgroup v2 path. The test asserts that this works under cgroup v2-only and under a mixed cgroup v1/v2 environment where net_classid is set in the former case. Before fix: # ./test_progs -t cgroup_v1v2 test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:client_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup_fd 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:server_fd 0 nsec run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec test_cgroup_v1v2:PASS:cgroup-v2-only 0 nsec run_test:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec run_test:PASS:prog_attach 0 nsec run_test:PASS:join_classid 0 nsec (network_helpers.c:219: errno: None) Unexpected success to connect to server test_cgroup_v1v2:FAIL:cgroup-v1v2 unexpected error: -1 (errno 0) #27 cgroup_v1v2:FAIL Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED After fix: # ./test_progs -t cgroup_v1v2 #27 cgroup_v1v2:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210913230759.2313-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
2021-09-14bpf, selftests: Replicate tailcall limit test for indirect call caseDaniel Borkmann1-0/+34
The tailcall_3 test program uses bpf_tail_call_static() where the JIT would patch a direct jump. Add a new tailcall_6 test program replicating exactly the same test just ensuring that bpf_tail_call() uses a map index where the verifier cannot make assumptions this time. In other words, this will now cover both on x86-64 JIT, meaning, JIT images with emit_bpf_tail_call_direct() emission as well as JIT images with emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect() emission. # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # ./test_progs -t tailcalls #136/1 tailcalls/tailcall_1:OK #136/2 tailcalls/tailcall_2:OK #136/3 tailcalls/tailcall_3:OK #136/4 tailcalls/tailcall_4:OK #136/5 tailcalls/tailcall_5:OK #136/6 tailcalls/tailcall_6:OK #136/7 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_1:OK #136/8 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_2:OK #136/9 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_3:OK #136/10 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_4:OK #136/11 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_5:OK #136 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # ./test_progs -t tailcalls #136/1 tailcalls/tailcall_1:OK #136/2 tailcalls/tailcall_2:OK #136/3 tailcalls/tailcall_3:OK #136/4 tailcalls/tailcall_4:OK #136/5 tailcalls/tailcall_5:OK #136/6 tailcalls/tailcall_6:OK [...] For interpreter, the tailcall_1-6 tests are passing as well. The later tailcall_bpf2bpf_* are failing due lack of bpf2bpf + tailcall support in interpreter, so this is expected. Also, manual inspection shows that both loaded programs from tailcall_3 and tailcall_6 test case emit the expected opcodes: * tailcall_3 disasm, emit_bpf_tail_call_direct(): [...] b: push %rax c: push %rbx d: push %r13 f: mov %rdi,%rbx 12: movabs $0xffff8d3f5afb0200,%r13 1c: mov %rbx,%rdi 1f: mov %r13,%rsi 22: xor %edx,%edx _ 24: mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax | limit check 2a: cmp $0x20,%eax | 2d: ja 0x0000000000000046 | 2f: add $0x1,%eax | 32: mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp) |_ 38: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 3d: pop %r13 3f: pop %rbx 40: pop %rax 41: jmpq 0xffffffffffffe377 [...] * tailcall_6 disasm, emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect(): [...] 47: movabs $0xffff8d3f59143a00,%rsi 51: mov %edx,%edx 53: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 56: jbe 0x0000000000000093 _ 58: mov -0x4(%rbp),%eax | limit check 5e: cmp $0x20,%eax | 61: ja 0x0000000000000093 | 63: add $0x1,%eax | 66: mov %eax,-0x4(%rbp) |_ 6c: mov 0x110(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rcx 74: test %rcx,%rcx 77: je 0x0000000000000093 79: pop %rax 7a: mov 0x30(%rcx),%rcx 7e: add $0xb,%rcx 82: callq 0x000000000000008e 87: pause 89: lfence 8c: jmp 0x0000000000000087 8e: mov %rcx,(%rsp) 92: retq [...] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Acked-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAM1=_QRyRVCODcXo_Y6qOm1iT163HoiSj8U2pZ8Rj3hzMTT=HQ@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210910091900.16119-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
2021-09-13selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshotSong Liu1-0/+40
This test uses bpf_get_branch_snapshot from a fexit program. The test uses a target function (bpf_testmod_loop_test) and compares the record against kallsyms. If there isn't enough record matching kallsyms, the test fails. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210910183352.3151445-4-songliubraving@fb.com
2021-09-11selftests/bpf: Test new __sk_buff field hwtstampVadim Fedorenko1-0/+2
Analogous to the gso_segs selftests introduced in commit d9ff286a0f59 ("bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field"). Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210909220409.8804-3-vfedorenko@novek.ru
2021-09-08bpf: Permit ingress_ifindex in bpf_prog_test_run_xattrNeil Spring1-0/+4
bpf_prog_test_run_xattr takes a struct __sk_buff, but did not permit that __skbuff to include an nonzero ingress_ifindex. This patch updates to allow ingress_ifindex, convert the __sk_buff field to sk_buff (skb_iif) and back, and tests that the value is present from on BPF program side. The test sets an unlikely distinct value for ingress_ifindex (11) from ifindex (1), which is in line with the rest of the synthetic field tests. Adding this support allows testing BPF that operates differently on incoming and outgoing skbs by discriminating on this field. Signed-off-by: Neil Spring <ntspring@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210831033356.1459316-1-ntspring@fb.com
2021-09-07selftests/bpf: Fix build of task_pt_regs test for arm64Jean-Philippe Brucker1-6/+13
struct pt_regs is not exported to userspace on all archs. arm64 and s390 export "user_pt_regs" instead, which causes build failure at the moment: progs/test_task_pt_regs.c:8:16: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct pt_regs' struct pt_regs current_regs = {}; Instead of using pt_regs from ptrace.h, use the larger kernel struct from vmlinux.h directly. Since the test runner task_pt_regs.c does not have access to the kernel struct definition, copy it into a char array. Fixes: 576d47bb1a92 ("bpf: selftests: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() selftest") Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210906163635.302307-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org
2021-08-26bpf: selftests: Add dctcp fallback testMartin KaFai Lau2-0/+51
This patch makes the bpf_dctcp test to fallback to cubic by using setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION) when the tcp flow is not ecn ready. It also checks setsockopt() is not available to release(). The settimeo() from the network_helpers.h is used, so the local one is removed. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210824173026.3979130-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-08-26bpf: selftests: Add sk_state to bpf_tcp_helpers.hMartin KaFai Lau1-2/+2
Add sk_state define to bpf_tcp_helpers.h. Rename the existing global variable "sk_state" in the kfunc_call test to "sk_state_res". Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210824173013.3977316-1-kafai@fb.com
2021-08-25bpf: selftests: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() selftestDaniel Xu1-0/+29
This test retrieves the uprobe's pt_regs in two different ways and compares the contents in an arch-agnostic way. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5581eb8800f6625ec8813fe21e9dce1fbdef4937.1629772842.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
2021-08-25selftests/bpf: Test for get_netns_cookieXu Liu1-5/+50
Add test to use get_netns_cookie() from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG. Signed-off-by: Xu Liu <liuxu623@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820071712.52852-3-liuxu623@gmail.com
2021-08-20selftests/bpf: Add tests for {set|get} socket option from setsockopt BPFPrankur Gupta1-0/+39
Adding selftests for the newly added functionality to call bpf_setsockopt() and bpf_getsockopt() from setsockopt BPF programs. Test Details: 1. BPF Program Checks for changes in IPV6_TCLASS(SOL_IPV6) via setsockopt If the cca for the socket is not cubic do nothing If the newly set value for IPV6_TCLASS is 45 (0x2d) (as per our use-case) then change the cc from cubic to reno 2. User Space Program Creates an AF_INET6 socket and set the cca for that to be "cubic" Attach the program and set the IPV6_TCLASS to 0x2d using setsockopt Verify the cca for the socket changed to reno Signed-off-by: Prankur Gupta <prankgup@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210817224221.3257826-3-prankgup@fb.com
2021-08-19selftests/bpf: Test for get_netns_cookieXu Liu1-0/+39
Add test to use get_netns_cookie() from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS. Signed-off-by: Xu Liu <liuxu623@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210818105820.91894-3-liuxu623@gmail.com
2021-08-17selftests/bpf: Add bpf_cookie selftests for high-level APIsAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+85
Add selftest with few subtests testing proper bpf_cookie usage. Kprobe and uprobe subtests are pretty straightforward and just validate that the same BPF program attached with different bpf_cookie will be triggered with those different bpf_cookie values. Tracepoint subtest is a bit more interesting, as it is the only perf_event-based BPF hook that shares bpf_prog_array between multiple perf_events internally. This means that the same BPF program can't be attached to the same tracepoint multiple times. So we have 3 identical copies. This arrangement allows to test bpf_prog_array_copy()'s handling of bpf_prog_array list manipulation logic when programs are attached and detached. The test validates that bpf_cookie isn't mixed up and isn't lost during such list manipulations. Perf_event subtest validates that two BPF links can be created against the same perf_event (but not at the same time, only one BPF program can be attached to perf_event itself), and that for each we can specify different bpf_cookie value. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-15-andrii@kernel.org
2021-08-17selftests/bpf: Test low-level perf BPF link APIAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+16
Add tests utilizing low-level bpf_link_create() API to create perf BPF link. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-13-andrii@kernel.org
2021-08-15selftest/bpf: Extend the bpf_snprintf() test for "%c".Kuniyuki Iwashima1-3/+3
This patch adds various "positive" patterns for "%c" and two "negative" patterns for wide character. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210814015718.42704-5-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp
2021-08-15selftest/bpf: Implement sample UNIX domain socket iterator program.Kuniyuki Iwashima3-0/+92
The iterator can output almost the same result compared to /proc/net/unix. The header line is aligned, and the Inode column uses "%8lu" because "%5lu" can be easily overflown. # cat /sys/fs/bpf/unix Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path ffff963c06689800: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 18697 private/defer ffff963c7c979c00: 00000002 00000000 00000000 0001 01 598245 @Hello@World@ # cat /proc/net/unix Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path ffff963c06689800: 00000002 00000000 00010000 0001 01 18697 private/defer ffff963c7c979c00: 00000002 00000000 00000000 0001 01 598245 @Hello@World@ Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210814015718.42704-4-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp
2021-08-14selftests/bpf: Verify bpf_get_netns_cookie in BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPTStanislav Fomichev1-0/+16
Add extra calls to sockopt_sk.c. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210813230530.333779-3-sdf@google.com
2021-08-14selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machinesIlya Leoshkevich1-5/+15
The "probed" part of test_core_autosize copies an integer using bpf_core_read() into an integer of a potentially different size. On big-endian machines a destination offset is required for this to produce a sensible result. Fixes: 888d83b961f6 ("selftests/bpf: Validate libbpf's auto-sizing of LD/ST/STX instructions") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210812224814.187460-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-08-14libbpf: Support weak typed ksyms.Hao Luo1-0/+56
Currently weak typeless ksyms have default value zero, when they don't exist in the kernel. However, weak typed ksyms are rejected by libbpf if they can not be resolved. This means that if a bpf object contains the declaration of a nonexistent weak typed ksym, it will be rejected even if there is no program that references the symbol. Nonexistent weak typed ksyms can also default to zero just like typeless ones. This allows programs that access weak typed ksyms to be accepted by verifier, if the accesses are guarded. For example, extern const int bpf_link_fops3 __ksym __weak; /* then in BPF program */ if (&bpf_link_fops3) { /* use bpf_link_fops3 */ } If actual use of nonexistent typed ksym is not guarded properly, verifier would see that register is not PTR_TO_BTF_ID and wouldn't allow to use it for direct memory reads or passing it to BPF helpers. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210812003819.2439037-1-haoluo@google.com
2021-08-10selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_tx.c prog section nameJussi Maki1-1/+1
The program type cannot be deduced from 'tx' which causes an invalid argument error when trying to load xdp_tx.o using the skeleton. Rename the section name to "xdp" so that libbpf can deduce the type. Signed-off-by: Jussi Maki <joamaki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210731055738.16820-7-joamaki@gmail.com
2021-08-06selftests/bpf: Rename reference_tracking BPF programsAndrii Nakryiko1-7/+7
BPF programs for reference_tracking selftest use "fail_" prefix to notify that they are expected to fail. This is really confusing and inconvenient when trying to grep through test_progs output to find *actually* failed tests. So rename the prefix from "fail_" to "err_". Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210805230734.437914-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-08-06selftests/bpf: Fix bpf-iter-tcp4 test to print correctly the dest IPJose Blanquicet1-1/+1
Currently, this test is incorrectly printing the destination port in place of the destination IP. Fixes: 2767c97765cb ("selftests/bpf: Implement sample tcp/tcp6 bpf_iter programs") Signed-off-by: Jose Blanquicet <josebl@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210805164044.527903-1-josebl@microsoft.com