summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-03-10perf block-info: Support color ops to print block percents in colorJin Yao1-10/+15
It would be nice to print the block percents with colors. This patch supports the 'Sampled Cycles%' and 'Avg Cycles%' printed in colors. For example, perf record -b ... perf report --total-cycles or perf report --total-cycles --stdio percent > 5%, colored in red percent > 0.5%, colored in green percent < 0.5%, default color Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200202141655.32053-5-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-03-10perf block-info: Allow selecting which columns to report and its orderJin Yao1-16/+35
Currently we use a predefined array to set the block info output formats, it's fixed and inflexible. This patch adds two parameters "block_hpps" and "nr_hpps" in block_info__create_report and other static functions, in order to let user decide which columns to report and with specified report ordering. It should be more flexible. Buffers will be allocated to contain the new fmts, of course, we need to release them before perf exits. Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200202141655.32053-4-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-03-10perf diff: Use __block_info__cmp() to replace block_pair_cmp()Jin Yao1-2/+7
'perf diff' uses block_pair_cmp() to compare two blocks. But block_info__cmp() has the similar functionality and it's a bit more complete. This patch removes block_pair_cmp() and uses __block_info__cmp() instead. __block_info__cmp() is wrapped by block_info__cmp() and it doesn't receives a perf_hpp_fmt parameter. Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200202141655.32053-3-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-03-10perf block-info: Fix wrong block address comparison in block_info__cmp()Jin Yao1-15/+6
Commit 6041441870ab ("perf block: Cleanup and refactor block info functions") introduces block_info__cmp(), which compares two blocks. But the issues are: 1. It should return the strcmp cmp value only if it's not 0. 2. When symbol names are matched, we need to compare the addresses of blocks further. But it wrongly uses the symbol addresses for comparison. 3. If the syms are both NULL, we can't consider these two blocks are matched. This patch fixes above 3 issues. Fixes: 6041441870ab ("perf block: Cleanup and refactor block info functions") Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200202141655.32053-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-03-04perf diff: Fix undefined string comparison spotted by clang's -Wstring-compareNick Desaulniers1-1/+2
clang warns: util/block-info.c:298:18: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/block-info.c:298:51: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/block-info.c:298:18: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/block-info.c:298:51: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) { ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ util/map.c:434:15: error: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare] if (srcline != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Reviewer Notes: Looks good to me. Some more context: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wstring-compare The spec says: J.1 Unspecified behavior The following are unspecified: .. Whether two string literals result in distinct arrays (6.4.5). Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/900 Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200223193456.25291-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-20perf report: Jump to symbol source view from total cycles viewJin Yao1-2/+4
This patch supports jumping from tui total cycles view to symbol source view. For example, perf record -b ./div perf report --total-cycles In total cycles view, we can select one entry and press 'a' or press ENTER key to jump to symbol source view. This patch also sets sort_order to NULL in cmd_report() which will use the default branch sort order. The percent value in new annotate view will be consistent with the percent in annotate view switched from perf report (we observed the original percent gap with previous patches). v2: --- Fix the 'make NO_SLANG=1' error. (set __maybe_unused to annotation_opts in block_hists_tui_browse()). Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191118140849.20714-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-20perf util: Move block TUI function to ui browsersJin Yao1-64/+1
It would be nice if we could jump to the assembler/source view (like the normal perf report) from total cycles view. This patch moves the block_hists_tui_browse from block-info.c to ui/browsers/hists.c in order to reuse some browser codes (i.e do_annotate) for implementing new annotation view. v2: --- Fix the 'make NO_SLANG=1' error. (Change 'int block_hists_tui_browse()' to 'static inline int block_hists_tui_browse()') Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191118140849.20714-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tuiJin Yao1-1/+73
Previous patch has implemented a new option "--total-cycles". But only stdio mode is supported. This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'. For example, perf record -b ./div perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 # Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles' Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so -------------------------------------------------- v7: --- 1. Since we have used use_browser in report__browse_block_hists to support stdio mode, now we also add supporting for tui. 2. Move block tui browser code from ui/browsers/hists.c to block-info.c. v6: --- Create report__tui_browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). v5: --- Fix a crash issue when running perf report without '--total-cycles'. The issue is because the internal flag is renamed from 'total_cycles' to 'total_cycles_mode' in previous patch but this patch still uses 'total_cycles' to check if the '--total-cycles' option is enabled, which causes the code to be inconsistent. v4: --- Since the block collection is moved out of printing in previous patch, this patch is updated accordingly for tui supporting. v3: --- Minor change since the function name is changed: block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-8-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07perf report: Support --percent-limit for --total-cyclesJin Yao1-0/+10
We have already supported the '--total-cycles' option in previous patch. It's also useful to show entries only above a threshold percent. This patch enables '--percent-limit' for not showing entries under that percent. For example: perf report --total-cycles --stdio --percent-limit 1 # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................................. .................... # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so Committer testing: From second exapmple onwards slightly edited for brevity: # perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 2 --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] # # (Tip: Create an archive with symtabs to analyse on other machine: perf archive) # # perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 --stdio # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so # # perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 0.7 --stdio # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] # ------------------------------------------- It only shows the entries which 'Sampled Cycles%' > 1%. v7: --- No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because previous patches are changed. v6: --- No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because previous patches are changed. v5: --- No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because previous patches are changed. v4: --- No functional change. Only fix the build issue because previous patches are changed. Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-7-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdioJin Yao1-0/+17
It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate on the globally hottest blocks. This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the percent: percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode. For example, # perf record -b ./div # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 2753248 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................ ................. # 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so 0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so 0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms] 0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms] Committer testing: This should provide material for hours of endless joy, both from looking for suspicious things in the implementation of this patch, such as the top one: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] As well from things that look legit: # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] :-) Very short system wide taken branches session: # perf record -h -b Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>] or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>] -b, --branch-any sample any taken branches # # perf record -b ^C[ perf record: Woken up 595 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 156.672 MB perf.data (196873 samples) ] # # perf evlist -v cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|BRANCH_STACK, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, branch_sample_type: ANY # # perf report --total-cycles --stdio # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6M of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6299936 # # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object # ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... .................... # 2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux] 1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so 0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.56% 541.8K 0.09% 672 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:300] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.39% 293.2K 0.01% 104 [list_debug.c:43 -> list_debug.c:61] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.36% 278.6K 0.03% 272 [entry_64.S:1289 -> entry_64.S:1308] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.30% 260.8K 0.07% 564 [clear_page_64.S:47 -> clear_page_64.S:50] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.28% 215.3K 0.05% 369 [traps.c:623 -> traps.c:628] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.23% 178.1K 0.04% 278 [entry_64.S:271 -> entry_64.S:275] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 152.6K 0.09% 706 [paravirt.c:177 -> paravirt.c:179] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.20% 155.8K 0.05% 373 [entry_64.S:153 -> entry_64.S:175] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.18% 136.6K 0.03% 222 [msr.h:105 -> msr.h:166] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.16% 118.3K 0.01% 44 [entry_64.S:632 -> entry_64.S:657] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.14% 104.5K 0.00% 28 [rwsem.c:1541 -> rwsem.c:1544] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 99.2K 0.01% 53 [spinlock.c:150 -> spinlock.c:152] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.13% 95.5K 0.00% 35 [swap.c:456 -> swap.c:471] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.12% 96.2K 0.05% 407 [copy_user_64.S:175 -> copy_user_64.S:209] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.11% 85.9K 0.00% 31 [swap.c:400 -> page-flags.h:188] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.10% 73.0K 0.01% 52 [paravirt.h:763 -> list.h:131] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 56.2K 0.03% 214 [filemap.c:1524 -> filemap.c:1557] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 54.2K 0.02% 145 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1049] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.07% 50.3K 0.00% 39 [mmzone.c:49 -> mmzone.c:69] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 48.3K 0.01% 40 [paravirt.h:768 -> page_alloc.c:3304] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.7K 0.02% 155 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1056] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 46.9K 0.01% 103 [swap.c:867 -> swap.c:902] [kernel.vmlinux] 0.06% 47.8K 0.00% 34 [entry_64.S:1201 -> entry_64.S:1202] [kernel.vmlinux] ----------------------------------------------------------- v7: --- Use use_browser in report__browse_block_hists for supporting stdio and potential tui mode. v6: --- Create report__browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are moved from builtin-report.c). It's called from perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists. v5: --- 1. Move all block functions to block-info.c 2. Move the code of setting ms in block hist_entry to other patch. v4: --- 1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace '-s total_cycles' in v3. 2. Move block info collection out of block info printing. v3: --- 1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to process the blocks per symbol. 2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column length 3. Some minor cleanup Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-6-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07perf hist: Support block formats with compare/sort/displayJin Yao1-0/+310
This patch provides helper routines to support new columns for block info output. The new columns are: Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object v5: --- 1. Move more block related functions from builtin-report.c to block-info.c 2. Set ms (map+sym) in block hist_entry. Because this info is needed for reporting the block range (i.e. source line) Committer notes: Remove unused set_fmt() function, some build were not completing with: util/block-info.c:396:20: error: unused function 'set_fmt' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] static inline void set_fmt(struct block_fmt *block_fmt, ^ 1 error generated. Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-5-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-11-07perf block: Cleanup and refactor block info functionsJin Yao1-0/+129
We have already implemented some block-info related functions. Now it's time to do some cleanup, refactoring and move the functions and structures to new block-info.h/block-info.c. v4: --- Move code for skipping column length calculation to patch: 'perf diff: Don't use hack to skip column length calculation' v3: --- 1. Rename the patch title 2. Rename from block.h/block.c to block-info.h/block-info.c 3. Move more common part to block-info, such as block_info__process_sym. 4. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column length Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-3-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2024-10-27 06:23:45 +0300