summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-02-17ASoC: soc-pcm: fix hw param limits calculation for multi-DAIKai Vehmanen1-2/+7
In case DPCM runtime has multiple CPU DAIs, dpcm_init_runtime_hw() is called multiple times, once for each CPU DAI. This will lead to ignoring hw limits of all but the last DAI. Fix this by moving soc_pcm_hw_init() up by one level to dpcm_init_runtime_hw(). Fixes: 140f553d1298 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: fix hwparams min/max init for dpcm") Suggested-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210216172251.3023723-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-15ASoC: soc-pcm: fix hwparams min/max init for dpcmKai Vehmanen1-4/+2
When runtime is initialized with dpcm_init_runtime_hw(), some of the min/max calculations assume that defaults are set. For example calculation of channel min/max values may be done using zero-initialized data and soc_pcm_hw_update_chan() will always return max-channels of 0 in this case. This will result in failure to open the PCM at all. Fix the issue by calling soc_pcm_hw_init() before calling any soc_pcm_hw_update_*() functions. Remove the conditional code on runtime->hw.formats as this field is anyways set in soc_pcm_hw_init(). Fixes: 6cb56a4549e9 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_hw_update_chan()") Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210214220414.2876690-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-12ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_hw_update_format()Kuninori Morimoto1-7/+10
We have soc_pcm_hw_update_xxx() now. This patch creates same function for format. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pn1g90oa.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-12ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_hw_update_chan()Kuninori Morimoto1-20/+19
We have soc_pcm_hw_update_rate() now. This patch creates same function for chan. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r1lw90oo.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-12ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_hw_update_rate()Kuninori Morimoto1-29/+27
To update hw, we need to follow setting order 1) set hw->rates 2) call snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates() 3) update hw->rate_min/max To avoid random settings, this patch adds new soc_pcm_hw_update_rate() and share updating code. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sg6c90qv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-10ASoC: soc-pcm: change error message to debug messageShengjiu Wang1-2/+2
This log message should be a debug message, because it doesn't return directly but continue next loop. Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1612771965-5776-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-03ASoC: soc-pcm: fixup snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates() timingKuninori Morimoto1-4/+8
soc-pcm has snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates() which determine rate_min/rate_max. It updates runtime->hw.rate_min/max (A) based on hw->rates (B). int snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(...) { int i; for (...) { (B) if (runtime->hw.rates & (1 << i)) { (A) runtime->hw.rate_min = ... break; } } for (...) { (B) if (runtime->hw.rates & (1 << i)) { (A) runtime->hw.rate_max = ... break; } } return 0; } This means, setup order is 1) set hw->rates 2) call snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates() 3) update hw->rate_min/max soc_pcm_init_runtime_hw() is calling it in good order static void soc_pcm_init_runtime_hw(xxx) { ... 1) hw->rates = snd_pcm_rate_mask_intersect(...); 2) snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(...); 3) hw->rate_min = max(...); hw->rate_min = max(...); hw->rate_max = min_not_zero(...); hw->rate_max = min_not_zero(...); } But, dpcm_fe_dai_startup() is not. static int dpcm_fe_dai_startup(xxx) { ... 1) 3) dpcm_set_fe_runtime(...); 2) snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(...); ... } More detail of dpcm_set_fe_runtime() is static void dpcm_set_fe_runtime() { ... for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(rtd, i, cpu_dai) { ... 3) 1) dpcm_init_runtime_hw(...); } ... 3) 1) dpcm_runtime_merge_rate(...); } This patch fixup these into static void dpcm_set_fe_runtime() { ... for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(rtd, i, cpu_dai) { ... 1) 2) 3) dpcm_init_runtime_hw(...); } ... 1) 2) 3) dpcm_runtime_merge_rate(...); } static int dpcm_fe_dai_startup(xxx) { ... dpcm_set_fe_runtime(...); - snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(...); ... } Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k15l7ewd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8735ytaig8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-03ASoC: soc-pcm: use snd_pcm_hardware at dpcm_runtime_merge_xxx()Kuninori Morimoto1-23/+21
soc-pcm has dpcm_runtime_merge_xxx() functions, but uses parameters are very verbose. dpcm_runtime_merge_format(..., &runtime->hw.formats); dpcm_runtime_merge_chan(..., &runtime->hw.channels_min, &runtime->hw.channels_max); dpcm_runtime_merge_rate(..., &runtime->hw.rates, &runtime->hw.rate_min, &runtime->hw.rate_max); We want to replace it into dpcm_runtime_merge_format(..., runtime); dpcm_runtime_merge_chan(..., runtime); dpcm_runtime_merge_rate(..., runtime); This patch do it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874kj9aigd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-03ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_create_pcm() and simplify soc_new_pcm()Kuninori Morimoto1-15/+28
soc_new_pcm() implementation is very long / verbose / complex, thus, it is very difficult to read. If we read it carefully, we can notice that it is consisted by int soc_new_pcm(...) { (1) judging playback/caputre part (2) creating the PCM part (3) setup pcm/rtd part } This patch adds new soc_create_pcm() for (2) part and offload it from snd_pcm_new(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875z3paigi.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-03ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_get_playback_capture() and simplify soc_new_pcm()Kuninori Morimoto1-17/+28
soc_new_pcm() implementation is very long / verbose / complex, thus, it is very difficult to read. If we read it carefully, we can notice that it is consisted by int soc_new_pcm(...) { (1) judging playback/caputre part (2) creating the PCM part (3) setup pcm/rtd part } This patch adds new soc_get_playback_capture() for (1) part and offload it from soc_new_pcm(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877do5aign.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-02-03ASoC: soc-pcm: tidyup pcm settingKuninori Morimoto1-1/+1
Current soc_new_pcm() setups pcm randomly. This patch tidyup it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878s8laigt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-21ASoC: soc-pcm: cleanup soc_pcm_params_symmetry()Kuninori Morimoto1-45/+15
soc_pcm_params_symmetry() checks rate/channel/sample_bits state. These are very similar but different, thus, it needs to have very verbose code. This patch use macro for it and make code more simple. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878s8un6si.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-21ASoC: soc-pcm: cleanup soc_pcm_apply_symmetry()Kuninori Morimoto1-47/+20
soc_pcm_apply_symmetry() want to call snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() for rate/channel/sample_bits, but, it needs many condition checks. These are very similar but different, thus, it needs to have very verbose code. This patch use macro for it and make code more simple. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a6tan6sm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-21ASoC: sync parameter naming : rate / sample_bitsKuninori Morimoto1-12/+12
snd_pcm_runtime / snd_soc_dai / snd_soc_dai_driver / snd_soc_dai_link have related parameter which is similar but not same naming. struct snd_pcm_runtime { ... (A) unsigned int rate; ... (B) unsigned int sample_bits; ... }; struct snd_soc_dai { ... (A) unsigned int rate; (B) unsigned int sample_bits; ... }; struct snd_soc_dai_driver { ... (A) unsigned int symmetric_rates:1; (B) unsigned int symmetric_samplebits:1; ... }; struct snd_soc_dai_link { ... (A) unsigned int symmetric_rates:1; (B) unsigned int symmetric_samplebits:1; ... }; Because it is similar but not same naming rule, code can be verbose / can't share macro. This patch sync naming rule for framework. - xxx_rates; + xxx_rate; - xxx_samplebits; + xxx_sample_bits; old name will be removed if all drivers were switched to new naming rule. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87wnweolj6.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-21ASoC: soc-pcm: revert soc_pcm_apply_symmetry()Kuninori Morimoto1-20/+47
commit a39748d03cbc ("ASoC: soc-pcm: cleanup soc_pcm_apply_symmetry()") was applied by miscommunication. To more cleanup code, and to be easy review, this patch reverts it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2guoljm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-13ASoC: soc-pcm: cleanup soc_pcm_apply_symmetry()Kuninori Morimoto1-47/+20
soc_pcm_apply_symmetry() want to call snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() for rate/channel/sample_bits, but, it needs many condition check. These are very similar but different, thus, it needs to have very verbose code. This patch use macro for it and make code more simple. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87wnxo7uyq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-13ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_set_dai_params()Kuninori Morimoto1-25/+27
Getting rate/channels/sample_bits from param needs fixed method. This patch adds new soc_pcm_set_dai_params() and replace existing code. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2i47uyw.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-13ASoC: soc-pcm: add dpcm_set_be_update_state()Kuninori Morimoto1-4/+9
soc-pcm has dpcm_set_fe_update_state() to update FE's runtime_update (except dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger() which needs to update it without it). OTOH, it doesn't have BE's update function. O: dpcm_set_fe_update_state() X: dpcm_set_be_update_state() This patch add BE's dpcm_set_fe_update_state() Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zh2k7uz1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-13ASoC: soc-pcm: move dpcm_set_fe_update_state()Kuninori Morimoto1-23/+22
This patch moves dpcm_set_fe_update_state() to top side. This is prepare for cleanup soc-pcm.c Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/871rfw99jn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-11ASoC: soc-pcm: Fix an uninitialized error codeDan Carpenter1-0/+1
The error path here doesn't set "ret" so it returns uninitialized data instead of a negative error code. Fixes: 2c1382840c19 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: disconnect BEs if the FE is not ready") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/X/wfXQFxeMLvpO+1@mwanda Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-11ASoC: soc-pcm: return correct -ERRNO in failure pathSouptick Joarder1-1/+2
Kernel test robot throws below error -> sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:2523 dpcm_run_update_startup() error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'. Initializing ret = 0 and returning correct -ERRNO in failure path. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1610163901-5523-1-git-send-email-jrdr.linux@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-01-07ASoC: soc-pcm: disconnect BEs if the FE is not ready朱灿灿1-5/+14
FE is connected to two BEs, BE1 is active, BE2 is deactive. When closing BE1, FE/BE1 is in HW_FREE state, then BE2 is startup by mixer runtime update. For FE is in HW_FREE state, dpcm_run_update_startup() will skip BE2's startup because FE's state is HW_FREE, BE2 stays in FE's be_clients list. During FE's closed, the dpcm_fe_dai_close() will close all related BEs, BE2 will be closed. This will lead to BE2's dpcm[stream].users mismatch. We need disconnet all pending BEs in the corner case. Signed-off-by: zhucancan <zhucancan@vivo.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AAoArwDfDnoefyxzy2wyiaqm.1.1608885766936.Hmail.zhucancan@vivo.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-12-09ASoC: soc-pcm: care trigger rollbackKuninori Morimoto1-9/+33
soc_pcm_trigger() calls DAI/Component/Link trigger, but some of them might be failed. static int soc_pcm_trigger(...) { ... switch (cmd) { case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE: ret = snd_soc_link_trigger(substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) break; (*) ret = snd_soc_pcm_component_trigger(substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) break; ret = snd_soc_pcm_dai_trigger(substream, cmd); break; case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND: case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: ret = snd_soc_pcm_dai_trigger(substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) break; ret = snd_soc_pcm_component_trigger(substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) break; ret = snd_soc_link_trigger(substream, cmd); break; } ... } For example, if soc_pcm_trigger() failed at (*) point, we need to rollback previous succeeded trigger. This patch adds trigger mark for DAI/Component/Link, and do STOP if START/RESUME/PAUSE_RELEASE were failed. Because it need to use new rollback parameter, we need to modify DAI/Component/Link trigger functions in the same time. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a6uycssd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-12-09ASoC: soc-pcm: remove dpcm_do_trigger()Kuninori Morimoto1-21/+9
dpcm_be_dai_trigger() is calling dpcm_do_trigger() at each SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_xxx (1). int dpcm_be_dai_trigger(...) { for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) { (B) ... switch (cmd) { case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START: ... (1) ret = dpcm_do_trigger(...); ... case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME: ... (1) ret = dpcm_do_trigger(...); ... case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE: ... (1) ret = dpcm_do_trigger(...); ... case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP: ... (1) ret = dpcm_do_trigger(...); ... case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND: ... (1) ret = dpcm_do_trigger(...); ... case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: ... (1) ret = dpcm_do_trigger(...); ... } } } But it is just very verbose and duplicated function. Because We can indicate dev_dbg() (A) at dpcm_be_dai_trigger() (B). And dev_err() (C) is not needed because soc_pcm_trigger() itself indicates error message when error. static int dpcm_do_trigger(...) { int ret; (A) dev_dbg(...); ret = soc_pcm_trigger(substream, cmd); if (ret < 0) (C) dev_err(...); return ret; } This patch replace dpcm_do_trigger() to soc_pcm_trigger(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87blfecssk.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-12-07ASoC: pcm: send DAPM_STREAM_STOP event in dpcm_fe_dai_shutdownRanjani Sridharan1-0/+3
A recent change removed the call to send the DAPM_STREAM_STOP event in dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown. But this causes a regression when a PCM prepare is not paired with a hw_free. So, add the DAPM_STREAM_STOP event back to dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown() to fix this. The new sequence would be: soc_pcm_prepare() -> SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_START soc_pcm_hw_free() -> soc_pcm_hw_free() -> SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_STOP dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown() -> SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_STOP Note that the DAPM_STREAM_STOP will be called twice but it seems harmless. Fixes: a27b421f1d04 ('ASoC: pcm: call snd_soc_dapm_stream_stop() in soc_pcm_hw_clean') Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202193343.912942-1-ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-19ASoC: pcm: call snd_soc_dapm_stream_stop() in soc_pcm_hw_cleanRanjani Sridharan1-7/+3
Currently, the SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_START event is sent during pcm_prepare() but the SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_STOP event is sent only in dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown() after soc_pcm_close(). This results in an imbalance between when the DAPM widgets receive the PRE/POST_PMU/PMD events. So call snd_soc_dapm_stream_stop() in soc_pcm_hw_clean() before the snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_free() to keep the stream_stop DAPM event balanced with the stream_start event in soc_pm_prepare(). Also, in order to prevent duplicate DAPM stream events, remove the call for DAPM STREAM_START event in dpcm_fe_dai_prepare() and the call for DAPM STREAM_STOP event in dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(). Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117215001.163107-1-ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-10ASoC: soc-pcm: Get all BEs along DAPM pathSameer Pujar1-1/+2
dpcm_end_walk_at_be() stops the graph walk when first BE is found for the given FE component. In a component model we may want to connect multiple DAIs from different components. A new flag is introduced in 'snd_soc_card', which when set allows DAI/component chaining. Later PCM operations can be called for all these listed components for a valid DAPM path. Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1604329814-24779-3-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-11-05ASoC: pcm: DRAIN support reactivationCezary Rojewski1-0/+2
soc-pcm's dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger() supported DRAIN commnad up to kernel v5.4 where explicit switch(cmd) has been introduced which takes into account all SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_xxx but SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_DRAIN. Update switch statement to reactive support for it. As DRAIN is somewhat unique by lacking negative/stop counterpart, bring behaviour of dpcm_fe_dai_do_trigger() for said command back to its pre-v5.4 state by adding it to START/RESUME/PAUSE_RELEASE group. Fixes: acbf27746ecf ("ASoC: pcm: update FE/BE trigger order based on the command") Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026100129.8216-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-26ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_hw_clean() and call it from soc_pcm_hw_params/free()Kuninori Morimoto1-40/+16
soc_pcm_hw_params() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_hw_free(). static int soc_pcm_hw_params(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return ret; ^ component_err: | ... | interface_err: (A) ... | codec_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_hw_free() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_hw_free() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_hw_params/free() are handling 1) snd_soc_link_hw_params/free() 2) snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_params/free() 3) snd_soc_dai_hw_params/free() Now, 1) to 3) are handled. This patch adds new soc_pcm_hw_clean() and call it from soc_pcm_hw_params() as rollback, and from soc_pcm_hw_free() as normal close handler. Other difference is that soc_pcm_hw_free() handles digital mute if it was last user. Rollback also handles it by this patch. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h7rhgqab.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-26ASoC: soc-dai: add mark for snd_soc_dai_hw_params/free()Kuninori Morimoto1-3/+3
soc_pcm_hw_params() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_hw_free(). static int soc_pcm_hw_params(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return ret; ^ component_err: | ... | interface_err: (A) ... | codec_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_hw_free() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_hw_free() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_hw_params/free() are handling 1) snd_soc_link_hw_params/free() 2) snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_params/free() => 3) snd_soc_dai_hw_params/free() This patch is for 3) snd_soc_dai_hw_params/free(). The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose. For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons, and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed, 2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown. But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback, thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown. And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called, because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback. To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when hw_params() was succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked substream pointer. One note here is that it cares *previous* hw_params() only now, but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future. This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily update. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87imbxgqai.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-26ASoC: soc-component: add mark for snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_params/free()Kuninori Morimoto1-4/+3
soc_pcm_hw_params() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_hw_free(). static int soc_pcm_hw_params(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return ret; ^ component_err: | ... | interface_err: (A) ... | codec_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_hw_free() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_hw_free() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_hw_params/free() are handling 1) snd_soc_link_hw_params/free() => 2) snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_params/free() 3) snd_soc_dai_hw_params/free() This patch is for 2) snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_params/free(). The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose. For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons, and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed, 2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown. But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback, thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown. And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called, because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback. To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when hw_params() was succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked substream pointer. One note here is that it cares *previous* hw_params() only now, but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future. This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily update. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k0wdgqav.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-26ASoC: soc-link: add mark for snd_soc_link_hw_params/free()Kuninori Morimoto1-2/+2
soc_pcm_hw_params() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_hw_free(). static int soc_pcm_hw_params(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return ret; ^ component_err: | ... | interface_err: (A) ... | codec_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_hw_free() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_hw_free() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_hw_params/free() are handling => 1) snd_soc_link_hw_params/free() 2) snd_soc_pcm_component_hw_params/free() 3) snd_soc_dai_hw_params/free() This patch is for 1) snd_soc_link_hw_params/free(). The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose. For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons, and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed, 2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown. But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback, thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown. And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called, because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback. To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when hw_params() was succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked substream pointer. One note here ist that it cares *previous* hw_params() only now, but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future. This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily update. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfgtgqba.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-26ASoC: soc-pcm: move soc_pcm_hw_free() next to soc_pcm_hw_params()Kuninori Morimoto1-43/+43
This patch moves soc_pcm_hw_free() next to soc_pcm_hw_params(). This is prepare for soc_pcm_hw_params() cleanup Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87mu19gqbh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-01ASoC: soc-pcm: add missing ret=0 at soc_pcm_open()Kuninori Morimoto1-0/+1
commit 140a4532cdb8c ("ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_clean() and call it from soc_pcm_open/close()") switched to use soc_pcm_clean() at soc_pcm_open(). But it removed "return 0", and missing "ret = 0", because of it, it always return -EINVAL eventhough no error. This patch adds missing "ret = 0" for success case. Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ft6ya65z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-01ASoC: soc-pcm: ignore un-needed mutex_unlock() case on soc_pcm_open()Kuninori Morimoto1-2/+2
commit 140a4532cdb8c ("ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_clean() and call it from soc_pcm_open/close()") switch to call soc_pcm_clean() on soc_pcm_open() when rollback case. But, it uses "goto err" (A) *before* mutex_lock() (B) when error of snd_soc_pcm_component_pm_runtime_get(). The mutex_unlock() (C) is not needed in such case. This patch fix it. static int soc_pcm_open(...) { ... ret = snd_soc_pcm_component_pm_runtime_get(rtd, substream); if (ret < 0) (A) goto err; (B) mutex_lock_nested(...); ... err: (C) mutex_unlock(..); ... } Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k0waag44.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28ASoC: soc-pcm: remove unneeded dev_err() for snd_soc_component_module/open()Kuninori Morimoto1-10/+2
snd_soc_component_module_get(), snd_soc_component_open() itself will indicate error message, thus, soc_pcm_components_open() don't need to handle it. This patch removes these. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d026bwms.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28ASoC: soc-pcm: remove unneeded dev_err() for snd_soc_dai_startup()Kuninori Morimoto1-5/+1
snd_soc_dai_startup() itself will indicate error message, thus, soc_pcm_open() don't need to handle it. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87eemmbwmy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28ASoC: soc-pcm: add soc_pcm_clean() and call it from soc_pcm_open/close()Kuninori Morimoto1-39/+30
soc_pcm_open() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_close(). static int soc_pcm_open(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return 0; ^ config_err: | ... | rtd_startup_err: (A) ... | component_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_close() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_close() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_open/close() are handling 1) snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown() 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown() 3) snd_soc_component_module_get/put() 4) snd_soc_component_open/close() 5) pm_runtime_put/get() Now, 1) to 5) are handled. This patch adds new soc_pcm_clean() and call it from soc_pcm_open() as rollback, and from soc_pcm_close() as normal close handler. One note here is that it don't need to call snd_soc_runtime_deactivate() when rollback case, because it will be called without snd_soc_runtime_activate(). It also don't need to call snd_soc_dapm_stream_stop() when rollback case. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ft72bwn4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28ASoC: soc-component: add mark for snd_soc_pcm_component_pm_runtime_get/put()Kuninori Morimoto1-11/+6
soc_pcm_open() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_close(). static int soc_pcm_open(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return 0; ^ config_err: | ... | rtd_startup_err: (A) ... | component_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_close() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_close() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_open/close() are handling 1) snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown() 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown() 3) snd_soc_component_module_get/put() 4) snd_soc_component_open/close() => 5) pm_runtime_put/get() This patch is for 5) pm_runtime_put/get(). The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose. For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons, and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed, 2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown. But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback, thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown. And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called, because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback. To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when get() was succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked substream pointer. One note here is that it cares *current* get() only now. but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future. This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily update. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h7ribwnb.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28ASoC: soc-component: add mark for soc_pcm_components_open/close()Kuninori Morimoto1-21/+7
soc_pcm_open() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_close(). static int soc_pcm_open(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return 0; ^ config_err: | ... | rtd_startup_err: (A) ... | component_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_close() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_close() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_open/close() are handling 1) snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown() 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown() => 3) snd_soc_component_module_get/put() => 4) snd_soc_component_open/close() 5) pm_runtime_put/get() This patch is for 3) snd_soc_component_module_get/put() 4) snd_soc_component_open/close(). The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose. For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons, and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed, 2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown. But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback, thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown. And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called, because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback. To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when open() was succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked substream pointer. One note here is that it cares *current* open() only now. but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future. This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily update. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87imbybwno.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28ASoC: soc-link: add mark for snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown()Kuninori Morimoto1-2/+2
soc_pcm_open() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_close(). static int soc_pcm_open(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return 0; ^ config_err: | ... | rtd_startup_err: (A) ... | component_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_close() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_close() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_open/close() are handling 1) snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown() => 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown() 3) snd_soc_component_module_get/put() 4) snd_soc_component_open/close() 5) pm_runtime_put/get() This patch is for 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown(). The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose. For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons, and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed, 2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown. But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback, thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown. And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called, because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback. To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when startup() was succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked substream pointer. One note here is that it cares *current* startup() only now. but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future. This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily update. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k0webwnv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-28ASoC: soc-dai: add mark for snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown()Kuninori Morimoto1-2/+2
soc_pcm_open() does rollback when failed (A), but, it is almost same as soc_pcm_close(). static int soc_pcm_open(xxx) { ... if (ret < 0) goto xxx_err; ... return 0; ^ config_err: | ... | rtd_startup_err: (A) ... | component_err: | ... v return ret; } The difference is soc_pcm_close() is for all dai/component/substream, rollback is for succeeded part only. This kind of duplicated code can be a hotbed of bugs, thus, we want to share soc_pcm_close() and rollback. Now, soc_pcm_open/close() are handling => 1) snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown() 2) snd_soc_link_startup/shutdown() 3) snd_soc_component_module_get/put() 4) snd_soc_component_open/close() 5) pm_runtime_put/get() This patch is for 1) snd_soc_dai_startup/shutdown(). The idea of having bit-flag or counter is not enough for this purpose. For example if one DAI is used for 2xPlaybacks for some reasons, and if 1st Playback was succeeded but 2nd Playback was failed, 2nd Playback rollback doesn't need to call shutdown. But it has succeeded bit-flag or counter via 1st Playback, thus, 2nd Playback rollback will call unneeded shutdown. And 1st Playback's necessary shutdown will not be called, because bit-flag or counter was cleared by wrong 2nd Playback rollback. To avoid such case, this patch marks substream pointer when startup() was succeeded. If rollback needed, it will check rollback flag and marked substream pointer. One note here is that it cares *current* startup() only now. but we might want to check *whole* marked substream in the future. This patch is using macro named "push/pop", so that it can be easily update. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfgubwoc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-07ASoC: core: Do not cleanup uninitialized dais on soc_pcm_open failureCezary Rojewski1-1/+1
Introduce for_each_rtd_dais_rollback macro which behaves exactly like for_each_codec_dais_rollback and its cpu_dais equivalent but for all dais instead. Use newly added macro to fix soc_pcm_open error path and prevent uninitialized dais from being cleaned-up. Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Fixes: 5d9fa03e6c35 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: tidyup soc_pcm_open() order") Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907111939.16169-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-07-31Merge remote-tracking branch 'asoc/for-5.9' into asoc-nextMark Brown1-124/+66
2020-07-31ASoC: core: use less strict tests for dailink capabilitiesPierre-Louis Bossart1-18/+24
Previous updates to set dailink capabilities and check dailink capabilities were based on a flawed assumption that all dais support the same capabilities as the dailink. This is true for TDM configurations but existing configurations use an amplifier and a capture device on the same dailink, and the tests would prevent the card from probing. This patch modifies the snd_soc_dai_link_set_capabilities() helper so that the dpcm_playback (resp. dpcm_capture) dailink capabilities are set if at least one dai supports playback (resp. capture). Likewise the checks are modified so that an error is reported only when dpcm_playback (resp. dpcm_capture) is set but none of the CPU DAIs support playback (resp. capture). Fixes: 25612477d20b5 ('ASoC: soc-dai: set dai_link dpcm_ flags with a helper') Fixes: b73287f0b0745 ('ASoC: soc-pcm: dpcm: fix playback/capture checks') Suggested-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200723180533.220312-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-07-23ASoC: soc-xxx: add asoc_substream_to_rtd()Kuninori Morimoto1-31/+31
Current soc-xxx are getting rtd from substream by rtd = substream->private_data; But, getting data from "private_data" is very unclear. This patch adds asoc_substream_to_rtd() macro which is easy to understand that rtd from substream. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87wo2z0yve.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-06-26snd/soc: correct trivial kernel-doc inconsistencyColton Lewis1-0/+1
Silence documentation build warning by correcting kernel-doc comment for snd_soc_runtime_action. ./sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:220: warning: Function parameter or member 'action' not described in 'snd_soc_runtime_action' Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200626053953.68797-1-colton.w.lewis@protonmail.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-06-15Merge series "ASoC: improve core dmesg logs and verbosity" from Pierre-Louis ↵Mark Brown1-6/+7
Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>: Try to both reduce useless verbosity and keep useful error reports. Pierre-Louis Bossart (3): ASoC: soc-core: reduce verbosity of BE override message ASoC: soc-pcm: improve error messages in soc_pcm_new() ASoC: soc-pcm/compress: reduce verbosity on mapping ok messages sound/soc/soc-compress.c | 4 ++-- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 4 ++-- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 13 +++++++------ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1
2020-06-15ASoC: soc-component: merge soc_pcm_trigger_start/stop()Kuninori Morimoto1-39/+19
Now, soc_pcm_trigger_start/stop() are simple enough. Let's merge these into soc_pcm_trigger(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ftbbw8wj.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ASoC: soc-component: add snd_soc_pcm_component_trigger()Kuninori Morimoto1-16/+8
We have 2 type of component functions snd_soc_component_xxx() is focusing to component itself, snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx() is focusing to rtd related component. Now we can update snd_soc_component_trigger() to snd_soc_pcm_component_trigger(). This patch do it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k10nw8xf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>