summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rust/kernel
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-10-07rust: rbtree: fix `SAFETY` comments that should be `# Safety` sectionsMiguel Ojeda1-3/+6
The tag `SAFETY` is used for safety comments, i.e. `// SAFETY`, while a `Safety` section is used for safety preconditions in code documentation, i.e. `/// # Safety`. Fix the three instances recently added in `rbtree` that Clippy would have normally caught in a public item, so that we can enable checking of private items in one of the following commits. Fixes: 98c14e40e07a ("rust: rbtree: add cursor") Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-14-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: replace `clippy::dbg_macro` with `disallowed_macros`Miguel Ojeda1-5/+5
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel), we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly modified to use the kernel printing facilities). However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly (1.83.0). Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs` doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled. One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it. Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet), and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2]. In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the sample, as one would have expected. Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute, since otherwise it was not being applied. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11303 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11307 [2] Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-13-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: sync: remove unneeded `#[allow(clippy::non_send_fields_in_send_ty)]`Miguel Ojeda1-1/+0
Rust 1.58.0 (before Rust was merged into the kernel) made Clippy's `non_send_fields_in_send_ty` lint part of the `suspicious` lint group for a brief window of time [1] until the minor version 1.58.1 got released a week after, where the lint was moved back to `nursery`. By that time, we had already upgraded to that Rust version, and thus we had `allow`ed the lint here for `CondVar`. Nowadays, Clippy's `non_send_fields_in_send_ty` would still trigger here if it were enabled. Moreover, if enabled, `Lock<T, B>` and `Task` would also require an `allow`. Therefore, it does not seem like someone is actually enabling it (in, e.g., a custom flags build). Finally, the lint does not appear to have had major improvements since then [2]. Thus remove the `allow` since it is unneeded. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/RELEASES.md#version-1581-2022-01-20 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8045 [2] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-11-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: init: remove unneeded `#[allow(clippy::disallowed_names)]`Miguel Ojeda1-4/+0
These few cases, unlike others in the same file, did not need the `allow`. Thus clean them up. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-10-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: enable `clippy::ignored_unit_patterns` lintMiguel Ojeda1-1/+1
In Rust 1.73.0, Clippy introduced the `ignored_unit_patterns` lint [1]: > Matching with `()` explicitly instead of `_` outlines the fact that > the pattern contains no data. Also it would detect a type change > that `_` would ignore. There is only a single case that requires a change: error: matching over `()` is more explicit --> rust/kernel/types.rs:176:45 | 176 | ScopeGuard::new_with_data((), move |_| cleanup()) | ^ help: use `()` instead of `_`: `()` | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#ignored_unit_patterns = note: requested on the command line with `-D clippy::ignored-unit-patterns` Thus clean it up and enable the lint -- no functional change intended. Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/ignored_unit_patterns [1] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-8-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: enable `clippy::unnecessary_safety_comment` lintMiguel Ojeda2-3/+3
In Rust 1.67.0, Clippy added the `unnecessary_safety_comment` lint [1], which is the "inverse" of `undocumented_unsafe_blocks`: it finds places where safe code has a `// SAFETY` comment attached. The lint currently finds 3 places where we had such mistakes, thus it seems already quite useful. Thus clean those and enable it. Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/unnecessary_safety_comment [1] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-6-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: enable `clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lintMiguel Ojeda12-10/+43
Checking that we are not missing any `// SAFETY` comments in our `unsafe` blocks is something we have wanted to do for a long time, as well as cleaning up the remaining cases that were not documented [1]. Back when Rust for Linux started, this was something that could have been done via a script, like Rust's `tidy`. Soon after, in Rust 1.58.0, Clippy implemented the `undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint [2]. Even though the lint has a few false positives, e.g. in some cases where attributes appear between the comment and the `unsafe` block [3], there are workarounds and the lint seems quite usable already. Thus enable the lint now. We still have a few cases to clean up, so just allow those for the moment by writing a `TODO` comment -- some of those may be good candidates for new contributors. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351 [1] Link: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/#/undocumented_unsafe_blocks [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13189 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-5-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: types: avoid repetition in `{As,From}Bytes` implsMiguel Ojeda1-33/+35
In order to provide `// SAFETY` comments for every `unsafe impl`, we would need to repeat them, which is not very useful and would be harder to read. We could perhaps allow the lint (ideally within a small module), but we can take the chance to avoid the repetition of the `impl`s themselves too by using a small local macro, like in other places where we have had to do this sort of thing. Thus add the straightforward `impl_{from,as}bytes!` macros and use them to implement `FromBytes`. This, in turn, will allow us in the next patch to place a `// SAFETY` comment that defers to the actual invocation of the macro. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-4-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: workqueue: remove unneeded ``#[allow(clippy::new_ret_no_self)]`Miguel Ojeda1-1/+0
Perform the same clean commit b2516f7af9d2 ("rust: kernel: remove `#[allow(clippy::new_ret_no_self)]`") did for a case that appeared in workqueue in parallel in commit 7324b88975c5 ("rust: workqueue: add helper for defining work_struct fields"): Clippy triggered a false positive on its `new_ret_no_self` lint when using the `pin_init!` macro. Since Rust 1.67.0, that does not happen anymore, since Clippy learnt to not warn about `-> impl Trait<Self>` [1][2]. The kernel nowadays uses Rust 1.72.1, thus remove the `#[allow]`. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/7344 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9733 [2] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-2-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-07rust: types: add examples for the `Either` typeNell Shamrell-Harrington1-0/+9
We aim to have examples in all Rust types, thus add basic ones for the `Either` type. Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Nell Shamrell-Harrington <nells@linux.microsoft.com> Tested-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/291565/topic/x/near/467478085 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240918212052.8790-1-nells@linux.microsoft.com [ Reworded slightly. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-10-04rust: net::phy always define device_table in module_phy_driver macroFUJITA Tomonori1-6/+10
device_table in module_phy_driver macro is defined only when the driver is built as a module. So a PHY driver imports phy::DeviceId module in the following way then hits `unused import` warning when it's compiled as built-in: use kernel::net::phy::DeviceId; kernel::module_phy_driver! { drivers: [PhyQT2025], device_table: [ DeviceId::new_with_driver::<PhyQT2025>(), ], Put device_table in a const. It's not included in the kernel image if unused (when the driver is compiled as built-in), and the compiler doesn't complain. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240930134038.1309-1-fujita.tomonori@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-10-03rust: device: change the from_raw() functionGuilherme Giacomo Simoes2-13/+4
The function Device::from_raw() increments a refcount by a call to bindings::get_device(ptr). This can be confused because usually from_raw() functions don't increment a refcount. Hence, rename Device::from_raw() to avoid confuion with other "from_raw" semantics. The new name of function should be "get_device" to be consistent with the function get_device() already exist in .c files. This function body also changed, because the `into()` will convert the `&'a Device` into `ARef<Device>` and also call `inc_ref` from the `AlwaysRefCounted` trait implemented for Device. Signed-off-by: Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@gmail.com> Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1088 Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001205603.106278-1-trintaeoitogc@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-10-02rust: kunit: use C-string literals to clean warningMiguel Ojeda1-2/+2
Starting with upstream Rust commit a5e3a3f9b6bd ("move `manual_c_str_literals` to complexity"), to be released in Rust 1.83.0 [1], Clippy now warns on `manual_c_str_literals` by default, e.g.: error: manually constructing a nul-terminated string --> rust/kernel/kunit.rs:21:13 | 21 | b"\x013%pA\0".as_ptr() as _, | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use a `c""` literal: `c"\x013%pA"` | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#manual_c_str_literals = note: `-D clippy::manual-c-str-literals` implied by `-D warnings` = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::manual_c_str_literals)]` Apply the suggestion to clean up the warnings. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/13263 [1] Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240927164414.560906-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: file: add abstraction for `poll_table`Alice Ryhl2-0/+122
The existing `CondVar` abstraction is a wrapper around `wait_queue_head`, but it does not support all use-cases of the C `wait_queue_head` type. To be specific, a `CondVar` cannot be registered with a `struct poll_table`. This limitation has the advantage that you do not need to call `synchronize_rcu` when destroying a `CondVar`. However, we need the ability to register a `poll_table` with a `wait_queue_head` in Rust Binder. To enable this, introduce a type called `PollCondVar`, which is like `CondVar` except that you can register a `poll_table`. We also introduce `PollTable`, which is a safe wrapper around `poll_table` that is intended to be used with `PollCondVar`. The destructor of `PollCondVar` unconditionally calls `synchronize_rcu` to ensure that the removal of epoll waiters has fully completed before the `wait_queue_head` is destroyed. That said, `synchronize_rcu` is rather expensive and is not needed in all cases: If we have never registered a `poll_table` with the `wait_queue_head`, then we don't need to call `synchronize_rcu`. (And this is a common case in Binder - not all processes use Binder with epoll.) The current implementation does not account for this, but if we find that it is necessary to improve this, a future patch could store a boolean next to the `wait_queue_head` to keep track of whether a `poll_table` has ever been registered. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-8-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: file: add `Kuid` wrapperAlice Ryhl2-2/+69
Adds a wrapper around `kuid_t` called `Kuid`. This allows us to define various operations on kuids such as equality and current_euid. It also lets us provide conversions from kuid into userspace values. Rust Binder needs these operations because it needs to compare kuids for equality, and it needs to tell userspace about the pid and uid of incoming transactions. To read kuids from a `struct task_struct`, you must currently use various #defines that perform the appropriate field access under an RCU read lock. Currently, we do not have a Rust wrapper for rcu_read_lock, which means that for this patch, there are two ways forward: 1. Inline the methods into Rust code, and use __rcu_read_lock directly rather than the rcu_read_lock wrapper. This gives up lockdep for these usages of RCU. 2. Wrap the various #defines in helpers and call the helpers from Rust. This patch uses the second option. One possible disadvantage of the second option is the possible introduction of speculation gadgets, but as discussed in [1], the risk appears to be acceptable. Of course, once a wrapper for rcu_read_lock is available, it is preferable to use that over either of the two above approaches. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202312080947.674CD2DC7@keescook/ [1] Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-7-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: file: add `FileDescriptorReservation`Wedson Almeida Filho1-1/+74
Allow for the creation of a file descriptor in two steps: first, we reserve a slot for it, then we commit or drop the reservation. The first step may fail (e.g., the current process ran out of available slots), but commit and drop never fail (and are mutually exclusive). This is needed by Rust Binder when fds are sent from one process to another. It has to be a two-step process to properly handle the case where multiple fds are sent: The operation must fail or succeed atomically, which we achieve by first reserving the fds we need, and only installing the files once we have reserved enough fds to send the files. Fd reservations assume that the value of `current` does not change between the call to get_unused_fd_flags and the call to fd_install (or put_unused_fd). By not implementing the Send trait, this abstraction ensures that the `FileDescriptorReservation` cannot be moved into a different process. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-6-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: security: add abstraction for secctxAlice Ryhl3-0/+83
Add an abstraction for viewing the string representation of a security context. This is needed by Rust Binder because it has a feature where a process can view the string representation of the security context for incoming transactions. The process can use that to authenticate incoming transactions, and since the feature is provided by the kernel, the process can trust that the security context is legitimate. This abstraction makes the following assumptions about the C side: * When a call to `security_secid_to_secctx` is successful, it returns a pointer and length. The pointer references a byte string and is valid for reading for that many bytes. * The string may be referenced until `security_release_secctx` is called. * If CONFIG_SECURITY is set, then the three methods mentioned in rust/helpers are available without a helper. (That is, they are not a #define or `static inline`.) Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-5-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: cred: add Rust abstraction for `struct cred`Wedson Almeida Filho3-0/+90
Add a wrapper around `struct cred` called `Credential`, and provide functionality to get the `Credential` associated with a `File`. Rust Binder must check the credentials of processes when they attempt to perform various operations, and these checks usually take a `&Credential` as parameter. The security_binder_set_context_mgr function would be one example. This patch is necessary to access these security_* methods from Rust. This Rust abstraction makes the following assumptions about the C side: * `struct cred` is refcounted with `get_cred`/`put_cred`. * It's okay to transfer a `struct cred` across threads, that is, you do not need to call `put_cred` on the same thread as where you called `get_cred`. * The `euid` field of a `struct cred` never changes after initialization. * The `f_cred` field of a `struct file` never changes after initialization. Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-4-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: file: add Rust abstraction for `struct file`Wedson Almeida Filho3-0/+384
This abstraction makes it possible to manipulate the open files for a process. The new `File` struct wraps the C `struct file`. When accessing it using the smart pointer `ARef<File>`, the pointer will own a reference count to the file. When accessing it as `&File`, then the reference does not own a refcount, but the borrow checker will ensure that the reference count does not hit zero while the `&File` is live. Since this is intended to manipulate the open files of a process, we introduce an `fget` constructor that corresponds to the C `fget` method. In future patches, it will become possible to create a new fd in a process and bind it to a `File`. Rust Binder will use these to send fds from one process to another. We also provide a method for accessing the file's flags. Rust Binder will use this to access the flags of the Binder fd to check whether the non-blocking flag is set, which affects what the Binder ioctl does. This introduces a struct for the EBADF error type, rather than just using the Error type directly. This has two advantages: * `File::fget` returns a `Result<ARef<File>, BadFdError>`, which the compiler will represent as a single pointer, with null being an error. This is possible because the compiler understands that `BadFdError` has only one possible value, and it also understands that the `ARef<File>` smart pointer is guaranteed non-null. * Additionally, we promise to users of the method that the method can only fail with EBADF, which means that they can rely on this promise without having to inspect its implementation. That said, there are also two disadvantages: * Defining additional error types involves boilerplate. * The question mark operator will only utilize the `From` trait once, which prevents you from using the question mark operator on `BadFdError` in methods that return some third error type that the kernel `Error` is convertible into. (However, it works fine in methods that return `Error`.) Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-3-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: task: add `Task::current_raw`Alice Ryhl1-4/+11
Introduces a safe function for getting a raw pointer to the current task. When writing bindings that need to access the current task, it is often more convenient to call a method that directly returns a raw pointer than to use the existing `Task::current` method. However, the only way to do that is `bindings::get_current()` which is unsafe since it calls into C. By introducing `Task::current_raw()`, it becomes possible to obtain a pointer to the current task without using unsafe. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAH5fLgjT48X-zYtidv31mox3C4_Ogoo_2cBOCmX0Ang3tAgGHA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-2-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-30rust: types: add `NotThreadSafe`Alice Ryhl3-8/+36
This introduces a new marker type for types that shouldn't be thread safe. By adding a field of this type to a struct, it becomes non-Send and non-Sync, which means that it cannot be accessed in any way from threads other than the one it was created on. This is useful for APIs that require globals such as `current` to remain constant while the value exists. We update two existing users in the Kernel to use this helper: * `Task::current()` - moving the return type of this value to a different thread would not be safe as you can no longer be guaranteed that the `current` pointer remains valid. * Lock guards. Mutexes and spinlocks should be unlocked on the same thread as where they were locked, so we enforce this using the Send trait. There are also additional users in later patches of this patchset. See [1] and [2] for the discussion that led to the introduction of this patch. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nFDPJFnzE9Q5cqY7FwSMByRH2OAn_BpI4H53NQfWIlN6I2qfmAqnkp2wRqn0XjMO65OyZY4h6P4K2nAGKJpAOSzksYXaiAK_FoH_8QbgBI4=@proton.me/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nFDPJFnzE9Q5cqY7FwSMByRH2OAn_BpI4H53NQfWIlN6I2qfmAqnkp2wRqn0XjMO65OyZY4h6P4K2nAGKJpAOSzksYXaiAK_FoH_8QbgBI4=@proton.me/ [2] Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-alice-file-v10-1-88484f7a3dcf@google.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-26rust: sync: require `T: Sync` for `LockedBy::access`Alice Ryhl1-4/+14
The `LockedBy::access` method only requires a shared reference to the owner, so if we have shared access to the `LockedBy` from several threads at once, then two threads could call `access` in parallel and both obtain a shared reference to the inner value. Thus, require that `T: Sync` when calling the `access` method. An alternative is to require `T: Sync` in the `impl Sync for LockedBy`. This patch does not choose that approach as it gives up the ability to use `LockedBy` with `!Sync` types, which is okay as long as you only use `access_mut`. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 7b1f55e3a984 ("rust: sync: introduce `LockedBy`") Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240915-locked-by-sync-fix-v2-1-1a8d89710392@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-26rust: kernel: sort Rust modulesMiguel Ojeda1-1/+1
Rust modules are intended to be sorted, thus do so. This makes `rustfmtcheck` to pass again. Fixes: 570172569238 ("Merge tag 'rust-6.12' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux") Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240926124751.345471-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-09-25Merge tag 'rust-6.12' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linuxLinus Torvalds15-67/+3160
Pull Rust updates from Miguel Ojeda: "Toolchain and infrastructure: - Support 'MITIGATION_{RETHUNK,RETPOLINE,SLS}' (which cleans up objtool warnings), teach objtool about 'noreturn' Rust symbols and mimic '___ADDRESSABLE()' for 'module_{init,exit}'. With that, we should be objtool-warning-free, so enable it to run for all Rust object files. - KASAN (no 'SW_TAGS'), KCFI and shadow call sanitizer support. - Support 'RUSTC_VERSION', including re-config and re-build on change. - Split helpers file into several files in a folder, to avoid conflicts in it. Eventually those files will be moved to the right places with the new build system. In addition, remove the need to manually export the symbols defined there, reusing existing machinery for that. - Relax restriction on configurations with Rust + GCC plugins to just the RANDSTRUCT plugin. 'kernel' crate: - New 'list' module: doubly-linked linked list for use with reference counted values, which is heavily used by the upcoming Rust Binder. This includes 'ListArc' (a wrapper around 'Arc' that is guaranteed unique for the given ID), 'AtomicTracker' (tracks whether a 'ListArc' exists using an atomic), 'ListLinks' (the prev/next pointers for an item in a linked list), 'List' (the linked list itself), 'Iter' (an iterator over a 'List'), 'Cursor' (a cursor into a 'List' that allows to remove elements), 'ListArcField' (a field exclusively owned by a 'ListArc'), as well as support for heterogeneous lists. - New 'rbtree' module: red-black tree abstractions used by the upcoming Rust Binder. This includes 'RBTree' (the red-black tree itself), 'RBTreeNode' (a node), 'RBTreeNodeReservation' (a memory reservation for a node), 'Iter' and 'IterMut' (immutable and mutable iterators), 'Cursor' (bidirectional cursor that allows to remove elements), as well as an entry API similar to the Rust standard library one. - 'init' module: add 'write_[pin_]init' methods and the 'InPlaceWrite' trait. Add the 'assert_pinned!' macro. - 'sync' module: implement the 'InPlaceInit' trait for 'Arc' by introducing an associated type in the trait. - 'alloc' module: add 'drop_contents' method to 'BoxExt'. - 'types' module: implement the 'ForeignOwnable' trait for 'Pin<Box<T>>' and improve the trait's documentation. In addition, add the 'into_raw' method to the 'ARef' type. - 'error' module: in preparation for the upcoming Rust support for 32-bit architectures, like arm, locally allow Clippy lint for those. Documentation: - https://rust.docs.kernel.org has been announced, so link to it. - Enable rustdoc's "jump to definition" feature, making its output a bit closer to the experience in a cross-referencer. - Debian Testing now also provides recent Rust releases (outside of the freeze period), so add it to the list. MAINTAINERS: - Trevor is joining as reviewer of the "RUST" entry. And a few other small bits" * tag 'rust-6.12' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux: (54 commits) kasan: rust: Add KASAN smoke test via UAF kbuild: rust: Enable KASAN support rust: kasan: Rust does not support KHWASAN kbuild: rust: Define probing macros for rustc kasan: simplify and clarify Makefile rust: cfi: add support for CFI_CLANG with Rust cfi: add CONFIG_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS rust: support for shadow call stack sanitizer docs: rust: include other expressions in conditional compilation section kbuild: rust: replace proc macros dependency on `core.o` with the version text kbuild: rust: rebuild if the version text changes kbuild: rust: re-run Kconfig if the version text changes kbuild: rust: add `CONFIG_RUSTC_VERSION` rust: avoid `box_uninit_write` feature MAINTAINERS: add Trevor Gross as Rust reviewer rust: rbtree: add `RBTree::entry` rust: rbtree: add cursor rust: rbtree: add mutable iterator rust: rbtree: add iterator rust: rbtree: add red-black tree implementation backed by the C version ...
2024-09-06Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski4-9/+9
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR. Conflicts: drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c 2560db6ede1a ("net: phy: Fix missing of_node_put() for leds") 1dce520abd46 ("net: phy: Use for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped()") https://lore.kernel.org/20240904115823.74333648@canb.auug.org.au Adjacent changes: drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet.h drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/xilinx_axienet_main.c 858430db28a5 ("net: xilinx: axienet: Fix race in axienet_stop") 76abb5d675c4 ("net: xilinx: axienet: Add statistics support") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-09-05rust: avoid `box_uninit_write` featureMiguel Ojeda2-11/+12
Like commit 0903b9e2a46c ("rust: alloc: eschew `Box<MaybeUninit<T>>::write`"), but for the new `rbtree` and `alloc` code. That is, `feature(new_uninit)` [1] got partially stabilized [2] for Rust 1.82.0 (expected to be released on 2024-10-17), but it did not include `Box<MaybeUninit<T>>::write`, which got split into `feature(box_uninit_write)` [3]. To avoid relying on a new unstable feature, rewrite the `write` + `assume_init` pair manually. Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63291 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129401 [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129397 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904144229.18592-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-31rust: rbtree: add `RBTree::entry`Alice Ryhl1-75/+230
This mirrors the entry API [1] from the Rust standard library on `RBTree`. This API can be used to access the entry at a specific key and make modifications depending on whether the key is vacant or occupied. This API is useful because it can often be used to avoid traversing the tree multiple times. This is used by binder to look up and conditionally access or insert a value, depending on whether it is there or not [2]. Link: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/collections/btree_map/enum.Entry.html [1] Link: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/2849906 [2] Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822-b4-rbtree-v12-5-014561758a57@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-31rust: rbtree: add cursorMatt Gilbride1-0/+523
Add a cursor interface to `RBTree`, supporting the following use cases: - Inspect the current node pointed to by the cursor, inspect/move to it's neighbors in sort order (bidirectionally). - Mutate the tree itself by removing the current node pointed to by the cursor, or one of its neighbors. Add functions to obtain a cursor to the tree by key: - The node with the smallest key - The node with the largest key - The node matching the given key, or the one with the next larger key The cursor abstraction is needed by the binder driver to efficiently search for nodes and (conditionally) modify them, as well as their neighbors [1]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231101-rust-binder-v1-6-08ba9197f637@google.com/ [1] Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822-b4-rbtree-v12-4-014561758a57@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-31rust: rbtree: add mutable iteratorWedson Almeida Filho1-14/+89
Add mutable Iterator implementation for `RBTree`, allowing iteration over (key, value) pairs in key order. Only values are mutable, as mutating keys implies modifying a node's position in the tree. Mutable iteration is used by the binder driver during shutdown to clean up the tree maintained by the "range allocator" [1]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231101-rust-binder-v1-6-08ba9197f637@google.com/ [1] Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822-b4-rbtree-v12-3-014561758a57@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-31rust: rbtree: add iteratorWedson Almeida Filho1-18/+112
- Add Iterator implementation for `RBTree`, allowing iteration over (key, value) pairs in key order. - Add individual `keys()` and `values()` functions to iterate over keys or values alone. - Update doctests to use iteration instead of explicitly getting items. Iteration is needed by the binder driver to enumerate all values in a tree for oneway spam detection [1]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231101-rust-binder-v1-17-08ba9197f637@google.com/ [1] Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822-b4-rbtree-v12-2-014561758a57@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-31rust: rbtree: add red-black tree implementation backed by the C versionWedson Almeida Filho2-0/+433
The rust rbtree exposes a map-like interface over keys and values, backed by the kernel red-black tree implementation. Values can be inserted, deleted, and retrieved from a `RBTree` by key. This base abstraction is used by binder to store key/value pairs and perform lookups, for example the patch "[PATCH RFC 03/20] rust_binder: add threading support" in the binder RFC [1]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231101-rust-binder-v1-3-08ba9197f637@google.com/ [1] Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822-b4-rbtree-v12-1-014561758a57@google.com [ Updated link to docs.kernel.org. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-30rust: net::phy unified genphy_read_status function for C22 and C45 registersFUJITA Tomonori2-10/+30
Add unified genphy_read_status function for C22 and C45 registers. Instead of having genphy_c22 and genphy_c45 methods, this unifies genphy_read_status functions for C22 and C45. Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2024-08-30rust: net::phy unified read/write API for C22 and C45 registersFUJITA Tomonori2-23/+204
Add the unified read/write API for C22 and C45 registers. The abstractions support access to only C22 registers now. Instead of adding read/write_c45 methods specifically for C45, a new reg module supports the unified API to access C22 and C45 registers with trait, by calling an appropriate phylib functions. Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2024-08-30rust: net::phy implement AsRef<kernel::device::Device> traitFUJITA Tomonori1-7/+17
Implement AsRef<kernel::device::Device> trait for Device. A PHY driver needs a reference to device::Device to call the firmware API. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2024-08-30rust: net::phy support probe callbackFUJITA Tomonori1-0/+25
Support phy_driver probe callback, used to set up device-specific structures. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2024-08-30rust: sizes: add commonly used constantsFUJITA Tomonori2-0/+27
Add rust equivalent to include/linux/sizes.h, makes code more readable. Only SZ_*K that QT2025 PHY driver uses are added. Make generated constants accessible with a proper type. Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2024-08-27rust: alloc: eschew `Box<MaybeUninit<T>>::write`Jubilee Young1-2/+4
Upstream Rust's libs-api team has consensus for stabilizing some of `feature(new_uninit)`, but not for `Box<MaybeUninit<T>>::write`. Instead, we can use `MaybeUninit<T>::write`, so Rust for Linux can drop the feature after stabilization. That will happen after merging, as the FCP has completed [1]. This is required before stabilization because remaining-unstable API will be divided into new features. This code doesn't know about those yet. It can't: they haven't landed, as the relevant PR is blocked on rustc's CI testing Rust-for-Linux without this patch. [ The PR has landed [2] and will be released in Rust 1.82.0 (expected on 2024-10-17), so we could conditionally enable the new unstable feature (`box_uninit_write` [3]) instead, but just for a single `unsafe` block it is probably not worth it. For the time being, I added it to the "nice to have" section of our unstable features list. - Miguel ] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63291#issuecomment-2183022955 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129416 [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129397 [3] Signed-off-by: Jubilee Young <workingjubilee@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> [ Reworded slightly. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-25rust: types: add `ARef::into_raw`Kartik Prajapati1-1/+30
Add a method for `ARef` that is analogous to `Arc::into_raw`. It is the inverse operation of `ARef::from_raw`, and allows you to convert the `ARef` back into a raw pointer while retaining ownership of the refcount. This new function will be used by [1] for converting the type in an `ARef` using `ARef::from_raw(ARef::into_raw(me).cast())`. Alice has also needed the same function for other use-cases in the past, but [1] is the first to go upstream. This was implemented independently by Kartik and Alice. The two versions were merged by Alice, so all mistakes are Alice's. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801-vma-v3-1-db6c1c0afda9@google.com [1] Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1044 Signed-off-by: Kartik Prajapati <kartikprajapati987@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> [ Reworded to correct the author reference and changed tag to Link since it is not a bug. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-25rust: kernel: use docs.kernel.org links in code documentationMichael Vetter2-11/+11
Use links to docs.kernel.org instead of www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest in the code documentation. The links are shorter and cleaner. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1101 Signed-off-by: Michael Vetter <jubalh@iodoru.org> [ Reworded slightly. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add ListArcFieldAlice Ryhl2-0/+99
One way to explain what `ListArc` does is that it controls exclusive access to the prev/next pointer field in a refcounted object. The feature of having a special reference to a refcounted object with exclusive access to specific fields is useful for other things, so provide a general utility for that. This is used by Rust Binder to keep track of which processes have a reference to a given node. This involves an object for each process/node pair, that is referenced by both the process and the node. For some fields in this object, only the process's reference needs to access them (and it needs mutable access), so Binder uses a ListArc to give the process's reference exclusive access. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-10-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: support heterogeneous listsAlice Ryhl2-1/+177
Support linked lists that can hold many different structs at once. This is generally done using trait objects. The main challenge is figuring what the struct is given only a pointer to the ListLinks. We do this by storing a pointer to the struct next to the ListLinks field. The container_of operation will then just read that pointer. When the type is a trait object, that pointer will be a fat pointer whose metadata is a vtable that tells you what kind of struct it is. Heterogeneous lists are heavily used by Rust Binder. There are a lot of so-called todo lists containing various events that need to be delivered to userspace next time userspace calls into the driver. And there are quite a few different todo item types: incoming transaction, changes to refcounts, death notifications, and more. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-9-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add cursorAlice Ryhl1-0/+82
The cursor is very similar to the list iterator, but it has one important feature that the iterator doesn't: it can be used to remove items from the linked list. This feature cannot be added to the iterator because the references you get from the iterator are considered borrows of the original list, rather than borrows of the iterator. This means that there's no way to prevent code like this: let item = iter.next(); iter.remove(); use(item); If `iter` was a cursor instead of an iterator, then `item` will be considered a borrow of `iter`. Since `remove` destroys `iter`, this means that the borrow-checker will prevent uses of `item` after the call to `remove`. So there is a trade-off between supporting use in traditional for loops, and supporting removal of elements as you iterate. Iterators and cursors represents two different choices on that spectrum. Rust Binder needs cursors for the list of death notifications that a process is currently handling. When userspace tells Binder that it has finished processing the death notification, Binder will iterate the list to search for the relevant item and remove it. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-8-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add iteratorsAlice Ryhl1-0/+102
Rust Binder has lists containing stuff such as all contexts or all processes, and sometimes needs to iterate over them. This patch enables Rust Binder to do that using a normal for loop. The iterator returns the ArcBorrow type, so it is possible to grab a refcount to values while iterating. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-7-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add ListAlice Ryhl2-5/+331
Add the actual linked list itself. The linked list uses the following design: The List type itself just has a single pointer to the first element of the list. And the actual list items then form a cycle. So the last item is `first->prev`. This is slightly different from the usual kernel linked list. Matching that exactly would amount to giving List two pointers, and having it be part of the cycle of items. This alternate design has the advantage that the cycle is never completely empty, which can reduce the number of branches in some cases. However, it also has the disadvantage that List must be pinned, which this design is trying to avoid. Having the list items form a cycle rather than having null pointers at the beginning/end is convenient for several reasons. For one, it lets us store only one pointer in List, and it simplifies the implementation of several functions. Unfortunately, the `remove` function that removes an arbitrary element from the list has to be unsafe. This is needed because there is no way to handle the case where you pass an element from the wrong list. For example, if it is the first element of some other list, then that other list's `first` pointer would not be updated. Similarly, it could be a data race if you try to remove it from two different lists in parallel. (There's no problem with passing `remove` an item that's not in any list. Additionally, other removal methods such as `pop_front` need not be unsafe, as they can't be used to remove items from another list.) A future patch in this series will introduce support for cursors that can be used to remove arbitrary items without unsafe code. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-6-f5f5e8075da0@google.com [ Fixed a few typos. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add macro for implementing ListItemAlice Ryhl2-0/+146
Adds a macro for safely implementing the ListItem trait. As part of the implementation of the macro, we also provide a HasListLinks trait similar to the workqueue's HasWorkItem trait. The HasListLinks trait is only necessary if you are implementing ListItem using the impl_list_item macro. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-5-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add struct with prev/next pointersAlice Ryhl1-0/+119
Define the ListLinks struct, which wraps the prev/next pointers that will be used to insert values into a List in a future patch. Also define the ListItem trait, which is implemented by structs that have a ListLinks field. The ListItem trait provides four different methods that are all essentially container_of or the reverse of container_of. Two of them are used before inserting/after removing an item from the list, and the two others are used when looking at a value without changing whether it is in a list. This distinction is introduced because it is needed for the patch that adds support for heterogeneous lists, which are implemented by adding a third pointer field with a fat pointer to the full struct. When inserting into the heterogeneous list, the pointer-to-self is updated to have the right vtable, and the container_of operation is implemented by just returning that pointer instead of using the real container_of operation. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-4-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add tracking for ListArcAlice Ryhl2-3/+170
Add the ability to track whether a ListArc exists for a given value, allowing for the creation of ListArcs without going through UniqueArc. The `impl_list_arc_safe!` macro is extended with a `tracked_by` strategy that defers the tracking of ListArcs to a field of the struct. Additionally, the AtomicListArcTracker type is introduced, which can track whether a ListArc exists using an atomic. By deferring the tracking to a field of type AtomicListArcTracker, structs gain the ability to create ListArcs without going through a UniqueArc. Rust Binder uses this for some objects where we want to be able to insert them into a linked list at any time. Using the AtomicListArcTracker, we are able to check whether an item is already in the list, and if not, we can create a `ListArc` and push it. The macro has the ability to defer the tracking of ListArcs to a field, using whatever strategy that field has. Since we don't add any strategies other than AtomicListArcTracker, another similar option would be to hard-code that the field should be an AtomicListArcTracker. However, Rust Binder has a case where the AtomicListArcTracker is not stored directly in the struct, but in a sub-struct. Furthermore, the outer struct is generic: struct Wrapper<T: ?Sized> { links: ListLinks, inner: T, } Here, the Wrapper struct implements ListArcSafe with `tracked_by inner`, and then the various types used with `inner` also uses the macro to implement ListArcSafe. Some of them use the untracked strategy, and some of them use tracked_by with an AtomicListArcTracker. This way, Wrapper just inherits whichever choice `inner` has made. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-3-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: list: add ListArcAlice Ryhl3-0/+361
The `ListArc` type can be thought of as a special reference to a refcounted object that owns the permission to manipulate the `next`/`prev` pointers stored in the refcounted object. By ensuring that each object has only one `ListArc` reference, the owner of that reference is assured exclusive access to the `next`/`prev` pointers. When a `ListArc` is inserted into a `List`, the `List` takes ownership of the `ListArc` reference. There are various strategies for ensuring that a value has only one `ListArc` reference. The simplest is to convert a `UniqueArc` into a `ListArc`. However, the refcounted object could also keep track of whether a `ListArc` exists using a boolean, which could allow for the creation of new `ListArc` references from an `Arc` reference. Whatever strategy is used, the relevant tracking is referred to as "the tracking inside `T`", and the `ListArcSafe` trait (and its subtraits) are used to update the tracking when a `ListArc` is created or destroyed. Note that we allow the case where the tracking inside `T` thinks that a `ListArc` exists, but actually, there isn't a `ListArc`. However, we do not allow the opposite situation where a `ListArc` exists, but the tracking thinks it doesn't. This is because the former can at most result in us failing to create a `ListArc` when the operation could succeed, whereas the latter can result in the creation of two `ListArc` references. Only the latter situation can lead to memory safety issues. This patch introduces the `impl_list_arc_safe!` macro that allows you to implement `ListArcSafe` for types using the strategy where a `ListArc` can only be created from a `UniqueArc`. Other strategies are introduced in later patches. This is part of the linked list that Rust Binder will use for many different things. The strategy where a `ListArc` can only be created from a `UniqueArc` is actually sufficient for most of the objects that Rust Binder needs to insert into linked lists. Usually, these are todo items that are created and then immediately inserted into a queue. The const generic ID allows objects to have several prev/next pointer pairs so that the same object can be inserted into several different lists. You are able to have several `ListArc` references as long as they correspond to different pointer pairs. The ID itself is purely a compile-time concept and will not be present in the final binary. Both the `List` and the `ListArc` will need to agree on the ID for them to work together. Rust Binder uses this in a few places (e.g. death recipients) where the same object can be inserted into both generic todo lists and some other lists for tracking the status of the object. The ID is a const generic rather than a type parameter because the `pair_from_unique` method needs to be able to assert that the two ids are different. There's no easy way to assert that when using types instead of integers. Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-2-f5f5e8075da0@google.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-23rust: init: add `assert_pinned` macroBenno Lossin2-0/+97
Add a macro to statically check if a field of a struct is marked with `#[pin]` ie that it is structurally pinned. This can be used when `unsafe` code needs to rely on fields being structurally pinned. The macro has a special "inline" mode for the case where the type depends on generic parameters from the surrounding scope. Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Co-developed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814-linked-list-v5-1-f5f5e8075da0@google.com [ Replaced `compile_fail` with `ignore` and a TODO note. Removed `pub` from example to clean `unreachable_pub` lint. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2024-08-22rust: init: add `write_[pin_]init` functionsBenno Lossin2-25/+61
Sometimes it is necessary to split allocation and initialization into two steps. One such situation is when reusing existing allocations obtained via `Box::drop_contents`. See [1] for an example. In order to support this use case add `write_[pin_]init` functions to the pin-init API. These functions operate on already allocated smart pointers that wrap `MaybeUninit<T>`. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/f026532f-8594-4f18-9aa5-57ad3f5bc592@proton.me/ [1] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240819112415.99810-2-benno.lossin@proton.me Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>