summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/kmemleak.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-12-12kmemleak: avoid RCU stalls when freeing metadata for per-CPU pointersCatalin Marinas1-81/+97
On systems with large number of CPUs, the following soft lockup splat might sometimes happen: [ 2656.001617] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#364 stuck for 21s! [ksoftirqd/364:2206] : [ 2656.141194] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3d/0x70 : 2656.241214] Call Trace: [ 2656.243971] <IRQ> [ 2656.246237] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df [ 2656.251152] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df [ 2656.256066] ? kmemleak_free_percpu+0x11f/0x1f0 [ 2656.261173] ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x379/0x470 [ 2656.265984] ? __pfx_watchdog_timer_fn+0x10/0x10 [ 2656.271179] ? __hrtimer_run_queues+0x5f3/0xd00 [ 2656.276283] ? __pfx___hrtimer_run_queues+0x10/0x10 [ 2656.281783] ? ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x95/0x2c0 [ 2656.287573] ? ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0xdd/0x2c0 [ 2656.293380] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x2e9/0x780 [ 2656.298221] ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x184/0x640 [ 2656.304211] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8e/0xc0 [ 2656.309807] </IRQ> [ 2656.312169] <TASK> [ 2656.326110] kmemleak_free_percpu+0x11f/0x1f0 [ 2656.331015] free_percpu.part.0+0x1b/0xe70 [ 2656.335635] free_vfsmnt+0xb9/0x100 [ 2656.339567] rcu_do_batch+0x3c8/0xe30 [ 2656.363693] rcu_core+0x3de/0x5a0 [ 2656.367433] __do_softirq+0x2d0/0x9a8 [ 2656.381119] run_ksoftirqd+0x36/0x60 [ 2656.385145] smpboot_thread_fn+0x556/0x910 [ 2656.394971] kthread+0x2a4/0x350 [ 2656.402826] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 [ 2656.406861] </TASK> The issue is caused by kmemleak registering each per_cpu_ptr() corresponding to the __percpu pointer. This is unnecessary since such individual per-CPU pointers are not tracked anyway. Create a new object_percpu_tree_root rbtree that stores a single __percpu pointer together with an OBJECT_PERCPU flag for the kmemleak metadata. Scanning needs to be done for all per_cpu_ptr() pointers with a cond_resched() between each CPU iteration to avoid RCU stalls. [catalin.marinas@arm.com: update comment] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231206114414.2085824-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231127194153.289626-1-longman@redhat.comLink: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231201190829.825856-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reported-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231127194153.289626-1-longman@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-12-11kmemleak: add checksum to backtrace reportJim Cromie1-1/+1
Change /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak report format slightly, adding "(extra info)" to the backtrace header: from: " backtrace:" to: " backtrace (crc <cksum>):" The <cksum> allows a user to see recurring backtraces without detailed/careful reading of multiline stacks. So after cycling kmemleak-test a few times, I know some leaks are repeating. bash-5.2# grep backtrace /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | wc 62 186 1792 bash-5.2# grep backtrace /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | sort -u | wc 37 111 1067 syzkaller parses kmemleak for "unreferenced object" only, so is unaffected by this change. Other github repos are moribund. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231116224318.124209-3-jim.cromie@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-12-11kmemleak: drop (age <increasing>) from leak recordJim Cromie1-4/+2
Patch series "tweak kmemleak report format". These 2 patches make minor changes to the report: 1st strips "age <increasing>" from output. This makes the output idempotent; unchanging until a new leak is reported. 2nd adds the backtrace.checksum to the "backtrace:" line. This lets a user see repeats without actually reading the whole backtrace. So now the backtrace line looks like this: backtrace (crc 603070071): I surveyed for un-wanted effects upon users: Syzkaller parses kmemleak in executor/common_linux.h: static void check_leaks(char** frames, int nframes) It just counts occurrences of "unreferenced object", specifically it does not look for "age", nor would it choke on "crc" being added. github has 3 repos with "kmemleak" mentioned, all are moribund. gitlab has 0 hits on "kmemleak". This patch (of 2): Displaying age is pretty, but counter-productive; it changes with current-time, so it surrenders idempotency of the output, which breaks simple hash-based cataloging of the records by the user. The trouble: sequential reads, wo new leaks, get new results: :#> sum /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak 53439 74 /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak :#> sum /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak 59066 74 /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak and age is why (nothing else changes): :#> grep -v age /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | sum 58894 67 :#> grep -v age /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak | sum 58894 67 Since jiffies is already printed in the "comm" line, age adds nothing. Notably, syzkaller reads kmemleak only for "unreferenced object", and won't care about this reform of age-ism. A few moribund github repos mention it, but don't compile. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231116224318.124209-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231116224318.124209-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-12-07mm/kmemleak: move set_track_prepare() outside raw_spinlocksLiu Shixin1-1/+3
set_track_prepare() will call __alloc_pages() which attempts to acquire zone->lock(spinlocks), so move it outside object->lock(raw_spinlocks) because it's not right to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks in RT mode. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115082138.2649870-3-liushixin2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-12-07Revert "mm/kmemleak: move the initialisation of object to __link_object"Liu Shixin1-17/+19
Patch series "Fix invalid wait context of set_track_prepare()". Geert reported an invalid wait context[1] which is resulted by moving set_track_prepare() inside kmemleak_lock. This is not allowed because in RT mode, the spinlocks can be preempted but raw_spinlocks can not, so it is not allowd to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks. The second patch fix same problem in kmemleak_update_trace(). This patch (of 2): Move the initialisation of object back to__alloc_object() because set_track_prepare() attempt to acquire zone->lock(spinlocks) while __link_object is holding kmemleak_lock(raw_spinlocks). This is not right for RT mode. This reverts commit 245245c2fffd00 ("mm/kmemleak: move the initialisation of object to __link_object"). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115082138.2649870-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115082138.2649870-2-liushixin2@huawei.com Fixes: 245245c2fffd ("mm/kmemleak: move the initialisation of object to __link_object") Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAMuHMdWj0UzwNaxUvcocTfh481qRJpOWwXxsJCTJfu1oCqvgdA@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-26mm/kmemleak: move the initialisation of object to __link_objectLiu Shixin1-19/+17
In patch (mm: kmemleak: split __create_object into two functions), the initialisation of object has been splited in two places. Catalin said it feels a bit weird and error prone. So leave __alloc_object() to just do the actual allocation and let __link_object() do the full initialisation. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231023025125.90972-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-26mm/kmemleak: fix partially freeing unknown object warningLiu Shixin1-11/+31
delete_object_part() can be called by multiple callers in the same time. If an object is found and removed by a caller, and then another caller try to find it too, it failed and return directly. It still be recorded by kmemleak even if it has already been freed to buddy. With DEBUG on, kmemleak will report the following warning, kmemleak: Partially freeing unknown object at 0xa1af86000 (size 4096) CPU: 0 PID: 742 Comm: test_huge Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3kmemleak+ #54 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x37/0x50 kmemleak_free_part_phys+0x50/0x60 hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize+0x172/0x290 ? __pfx_vmemmap_remap_pte+0x10/0x10 __prep_new_hugetlb_folio+0xe/0x30 prep_new_hugetlb_folio.isra.0+0xe/0x40 alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio+0xc3/0xd0 alloc_surplus_hugetlb_folio.constprop.0+0x6e/0xd0 hugetlb_acct_memory.part.0+0xe6/0x2a0 hugetlb_reserve_pages+0x110/0x2c0 hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x11d/0x1b0 mmap_region+0x248/0x9a0 ? hugetlb_get_unmapped_area+0x15c/0x2d0 do_mmap+0x38b/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe6/0x190 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x18a/0x1f0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 Expand __create_object() and move __alloc_object() to the beginning. Then use kmemleak_lock to protect __find_and_remove_object() and __link_object() as a whole, which can guarantee all objects are processed sequentialally. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-8-liushixin2@huawei.com Fixes: 53238a60dd4a ("kmemleak: Allow partial freeing of memory blocks") Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-26mm: kmemleak: add __find_and_remove_object()Liu Shixin1-3/+14
Add new __find_and_remove_object() without kmemleak_lock protect, it is in preparation for the next patch. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-7-liushixin2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-26mm: kmemleak: use mem_pool_free() to free objectLiu Shixin1-5/+9
The kmemleak object is allocated by mem_pool_alloc(), which could be from slab or mem_pool[], so it's not suitable using __kmem_cache_free() to free the object, use __mem_pool_free() instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-6-liushixin2@huawei.com Fixes: 0647398a8c7b ("mm: kmemleak: simple memory allocation pool for kmemleak objects") Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-26mm: kmemleak: split __create_object into two functionsLiu Shixin1-21/+40
__create_object() consists of two part, the first part allocate a kmemleak object and initialize it, the second part insert it into object tree. This function need kmemleak_lock but actually only the second part need lock. Split it into two functions, the first function __alloc_object only allocate a kmemleak object, and the second function __link_object() will initialize the object and insert it into object tree, use the kmemleak_lock to protect __link_object() only. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-5-liushixin2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-26mm/kmemleak: fix print format of pointer in pr_debug()Liu Shixin1-14/+14
With 0x%p, the pointer will be hashed and print (____ptrval____) instead. And with 0x%pa, the pointer can be successfully printed but with duplicate prefixes, which looks like: kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0x(____ptrval____)) kmemleak: kmemleak_free_percpu(0x(____ptrval____)) kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0x0000000a1af86000) Use 0x%px instead of 0x%p or 0x%pa to print the pointer. Then the print will be like: kmemleak: kmemleak_free(0xffff9111c145b020) kmemleak: kmemleak_free_percpu(0x00000000000333b0) kmemleak: kmemleak_free_part_phys(0x0000000a1af80000) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018102952.3339837-4-liushixin2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-09-03mm/kmemleak: move up cond_resched() call in page scanning loopWaiman Long1-2/+3
Commit bde5f6bc68db ("kmemleak: add scheduling point to kmemleak_scan()") added a cond_resched() call to the struct page scanning loop to prevent soft lockup from happening. However, soft lockup can still happen in that loop in some corner cases when the pages that satisfy the "!(pfn & 63)" check are skipped for some reasons. Fix this corner case by moving up the cond_resched() check so that it will be called every 64 pages unconditionally. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230825164947.1317981-1-longman@redhat.com Fixes: bde5f6bc68db ("kmemleak: add scheduling point to kmemleak_scan()") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-08-21Rename kmemleak_initialized to kmemleak_late_initializedXiaolei Wang1-4/+4
The old name is confusing because it implies the completion of earlier kmemleak_init(), the new name update to kmemleak_late_initial represents the completion of kmemleak_late_init(). No functional changes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230815144128.3623103-3-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-08-21mm/kmemleak: use object_cache instead of kmemleak_initialized to check in ↵Xiaolei Wang1-1/+6
set_track_prepare() Patch series "mm/kmemleak: use object_cache instead of kmemleak_initialized", v3. Use object_cache instead of kmemleak_initialized to check in set_track_prepare(), so that memory leaks after kmemleak_init() can be recorded and Rename kmemleak_initialized to kmemleak_late_initialized unreferenced object 0xc674ca80 (size 64): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294938337 (age 204.880s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 80 55 75 c6 80 54 75 c6 00 55 75 c6 80 52 75 c6 .Uu..Tu..Uu..Ru. 00 53 75 c6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .Su.......... This patch (of 2): kmemleak_initialized is set in kmemleak_late_init(), which also means that there is no call trace which object's memory leak is before kmemleak_late_init(), so use object_cache instead of kmemleak_initialized to check in set_track_prepare() to avoid no call trace records when there is a memory leak in the code between kmemleak_init() and kmemleak_late_init(). unreferenced object 0xc674ca80 (size 64): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294938337 (age 204.880s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 80 55 75 c6 80 54 75 c6 00 55 75 c6 80 52 75 c6 .Uu..Tu..Uu..Ru. 00 53 75 c6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .Su.......... Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230815144128.3623103-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230815144128.3623103-2-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Fixes: 56a61617dd22 ("mm: use stack_depot for recording kmemleak's backtrace") Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-17lib/stackdepot, mm: rename stack_depot_want_early_initAndrey Konovalov1-1/+1
Rename stack_depot_want_early_init to stack_depot_request_early_init. The old name is confusing, as it hints at returning some kind of intention of stack depot. The new name reflects that this function requests an action from stack depot instead. No functional changes. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: update mm/kmemleak.c] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/359f31bf67429a06e630b4395816a967214ef753.1676063693.git.andreyknvl@google.com Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-03mm/kmemleak: fix UAF bug in kmemleak_scan()Waiman Long1-6/+29
Commit 6edda04ccc7c ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") fixes soft lockup problem in kmemleak_scan() by periodically doing a cond_resched(). It does take a reference of the current object before doing it. Unfortunately, if the object has been deleted from the object_list, the next object pointed to by its next pointer may no longer be valid after coming back from cond_resched(). This can result in use-after-free and other nasty problem. Fix this problem by adding a del_state flag into kmemleak_object structure to synchronize the object deletion process between kmemleak_cond_resched() and __remove_object() to make sure that the object remained in the object_list in the duration of the cond_resched() call. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-3-longman@redhat.com Fixes: 6edda04ccc7c ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-03mm/kmemleak: simplify kmemleak_cond_resched() usageWaiman Long1-36/+12
Patch series "mm/kmemleak: Simplify kmemleak_cond_resched() & fix UAF", v2. It was found that a KASAN use-after-free error was reported in the kmemleak_scan() function. After further examination, it is believe that even though a reference is taken from the current object, it does not prevent the object pointed to by the next pointer from going away after a cond_resched(). To fix that, additional flags are added to make sure that the current object won't be removed from the object_list during the duration of the cond_resched() to ensure the validity of the next pointer. While making the change, I also simplify the current usage of kmemleak_cond_resched() to make it easier to understand. This patch (of 2): The presence of a pinned argument and the 64k loop count make kmemleak_cond_resched() a bit more complex to read. The pinned argument is used only by first kmemleak_scan() loop. Simplify the usage of kmemleak_cond_resched() by removing the pinned argument and always do a get_object()/put_object() sequence. In addition, the 64k loop is removed by using need_resched() to decide if kmemleak_cond_resched() should be called. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-1-longman@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119040111.350923-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-01mm: use stack_depot_early_init for kmemleakZhaoyang Huang1-2/+3
Mirsad report the below error which is caused by stack_depot_init() failure in kvcalloc. Solve this by having stackdepot use stack_depot_early_init(). On 1/4/23 17:08, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote: I hate to bring bad news again, but there seems to be a problem with the output of /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak: [root@pc-mtodorov ~]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak unreferenced object 0xffff951c118568b0 (size 16): comm "kworker/u12:2", pid 56, jiffies 4294893952 (age 4356.548s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 6d 65 6d 73 74 69 63 6b 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 memstick0....... backtrace: [root@pc-mtodorov ~]# Apparently, backtrace of called functions on the stack is no longer printed with the list of memory leaks. This appeared on Lenovo desktop 10TX000VCR, with AlmaLinux 8.7 and BIOS version M22KT49A (11/10/2022) and 6.2-rc1 and 6.2-rc2 builds. This worked on 6.1 with the same CONFIG_KMEMLEAK=y and MGLRU enabled on a vanilla mainstream kernel from Mr. Torvalds' tree. I don't know if this is deliberate feature for some reason or a bug. Please find attached the config, lshw and kmemleak output. [vbabka@suse.cz: remove stack_depot_init() call] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5272a819-ef74-65ff-be61-4d2d567337de@alu.unizg.hr/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1674091345-14799-2-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com Fixes: 56a61617dd22 ("mm: use stack_depot for recording kmemleak's backtrace") Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: ke.wang <ke.wang@unisoc.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-12-16mm/kmemleak: use %pK to display kernel pointers in backtraceClément Léger1-1/+1
Currently, %p is used to display kernel pointers in backtrace which result in a hashed value that is not usable to correlate the address for debug. Use %pK which will respect the kptr_restrict configuration value and thus allow to extract meaningful information from the backtrace. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221108094322.73492-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-12-16mm: use stack_depot for recording kmemleak's backtraceZhaoyang Huang1-18/+28
Using stack_depot to record kmemleak's backtrace which has been implemented on slub for reducing redundant information. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build - remove now-unused __save_stack_trace()] [zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1667101354-4669-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix v3 layout oddities] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1666864224-27541-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: ke.wang <ke.wang@unisoc.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-12-01mm/kmemleak.c: fix a commentYixuan Cao1-1/+1
I noticed a typo in a code comment and I fixed it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221114171426.91745-1-caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-28mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in kmemleak_scan()'s object iteration loopsWaiman Long1-19/+42
Commit 6edda04ccc7c ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") adds cond_resched() in the first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan(). However, it turns that the 2nd objection iteration loop can still cause soft lockup to happen in some cases. So add a cond_resched() call in the 2nd and 3rd loops as well to prevent that and for completeness. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221020175619.366317-1-longman@redhat.com Fixes: 6edda04ccc7c ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-12mm/kmemleak: make create_object return voidLiu Shixin1-12/+9
No caller cares about the return value of create_object(), so make it return void. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901023007.3471887-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-17mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of ↵Waiman Long1-1/+27
kmemleak_scan() The first RCU-based object iteration loop has to modify the object count. So we cannot skip taking the object lock. One way to avoid soft lockup is to insert occasional cond_resched() call into the loop. This cannot be done while holding the RCU read lock which is to protect objects from being freed. However, taking a reference to the object will prevent it from being freed. We can then do a cond_resched() call after every 64k objects safely. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-4-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-17mm/kmemleak: skip unlikely objects in kmemleak_scan() without taking lockWaiman Long1-0/+14
There are 3 RCU-based object iteration loops in kmemleak_scan(). Because of the need to take RCU read lock, we can't insert cond_resched() into the loop like other parts of the function. As there can be millions of objects to be scanned, it takes a while to iterate all of them. The kmemleak functionality is usually enabled in a debug kernel which is much slower than a non-debug kernel. With sufficient number of kmemleak objects, the time to iterate them all may exceed 22s causing soft lockup. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:625] In this particular bug report, the soft lockup happen in the 2nd iteration loop. In the 2nd and 3rd loops, most of the objects are checked and then skipped under the object lock. Only a selected fews are modified. Those objects certainly need lock protection. However, the lock/unlock operation is slow especially with interrupt disabling and enabling included. We can actually do some basic check like color_white() without taking the lock and skip the object accordingly. Of course, this kind of check is racy and may miss objects that are being modified concurrently. The cost of missed objects, however, is just that they will be discovered in the next scan instead. The advantage of doing so is that iteration can be done much faster especially with LOCKDEP enabled in a debug kernel. With a debug kernel running on a 2-socket 96-thread x86-64 system (HZ=1000), the 2nd and 3rd iteration loops speedup with this patch on the first kmemleak_scan() call after bootup is shown in the table below. Before patch After patch Loop # # of objects Elapsed time # of objects Elapsed time ------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 2 2,599,850 2.392s 2,596,364 0.266s 3 2,600,176 2.171s 2,597,061 0.260s This patch reduces loop iteration times by about 88%. This will greatly reduce the chance of a soft lockup happening in the 2nd or 3rd iteration loops. Even though the first loop runs a little bit faster, it can still be problematic if many kmemleak objects are there. As the object count has to be modified in every object, we cannot avoid taking the object lock. So other way to prevent soft lockup will be needed. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-17mm/kmemleak: use _irq lock/unlock variants in kmemleak_scan/_clear()Waiman Long1-10/+8
Patch series "mm/kmemleak: Avoid soft lockup in kmemleak_scan()", v2. There are 3 RCU-based object iteration loops in kmemleak_scan(). Because of the need to take RCU read lock, we can't insert cond_resched() into the loop like other parts of the function. As there can be millions of objects to be scanned, it takes a while to iterate all of them. The kmemleak functionality is usually enabled in a debug kernel which is much slower than a non-debug kernel. With sufficient number of kmemleak objects, the time to iterate them all may exceed 22s causing soft lockup. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:625] This patch series make changes to the 3 object iteration loops in kmemleak_scan() to prevent them from causing soft lockup. This patch (of 3): kmemleak_scan() is called only from the kmemleak scan thread or from write to the kmemleak debugfs file. Both are in task context and so we can directly use the simpler _irq() lock/unlock calls instead of the more complex _irqsave/_irqrestore variants. Similarly, kmemleak_clear() is called only from write to the kmemleak debugfs file. The same change can be applied. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-1-longman@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614220359.59282-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-17mm: kmemleak: check physical address when scanPatrick Wang1-3/+14
Check the physical address of objects for its boundary when scan instead of in kmemleak_*_phys(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-5-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Fixes: 23c2d497de21 ("mm: kmemleak: take a full lowmem check in kmemleak_*_phys()") Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-17mm: kmemleak: add rbtree and store physical address for objects allocated ↵Patrick Wang1-42/+91
with PA Add object_phys_tree_root to store the objects allocated with physical address. Distinguish it from object_tree_root by OBJECT_PHYS flag or function argument. The physical address is stored directly in those objects. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-4-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-17mm: kmemleak: add OBJECT_PHYS flag for objects allocated with physical addressPatrick Wang1-9/+31
Add OBJECT_PHYS flag for object. This flag is used to identify the objects allocated with physical address. The create_object_phys() function is added as well to set that flag and is used by kmemleak_alloc_phys(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-3-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-17mm: kmemleak: remove kmemleak_not_leak_phys() and the min_count argument to ↵Patrick Wang1-17/+3
kmemleak_alloc_phys() Patch series "mm: kmemleak: store objects allocated with physical address separately and check when scan", v4. The kmemleak_*_phys() interface uses "min_low_pfn" and "max_low_pfn" to check address. But on some architectures, kmemleak_*_phys() is called before those two variables initialized. The following steps will be taken: 1) Add OBJECT_PHYS flag and rbtree for the objects allocated with physical address 2) Store physical address in objects if allocated with OBJECT_PHYS 3) Check the boundary when scan instead of in kmemleak_*_phys() This patch set will solve: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527032504.30341-1-yee.lee@mediatek.com https://lore.kernel.org/r/9dd08bb5-f39e-53d8-f88d-bec598a08c93@gmail.com v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609124950.1694394-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220603035415.1243913-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220531150823.1004101-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com This patch (of 4): Remove the unused kmemleak_not_leak_phys() function. And remove the min_count argument to kmemleak_alloc_phys() function, assume it's 0. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-2-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-16mm: kmemleak: take a full lowmem check in kmemleak_*_phys()Patrick Wang1-4/+4
The kmemleak_*_phys() apis do not check the address for lowmem's min boundary, while the caller may pass an address below lowmem, which will trigger an oops: # echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ff5fffffffe00000 Oops [#1] Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 134 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-next-20220407 #33 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : scan_block+0x74/0x15c ra : scan_block+0x72/0x15c epc : ffffffff801e5806 ra : ffffffff801e5804 sp : ff200000104abc30 gp : ffffffff815cd4e8 tp : ff60000004cfa340 t0 : 0000000000000200 t1 : 00aaaaaac23954cc t2 : 00000000000003ff s0 : ff200000104abc90 s1 : ffffffff81b0ff28 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : ff5fffffffe01000 a2 : ffffffff81b0ff28 a3 : 0000000000000002 a4 : 0000000000000001 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ff200000104abd7c a7 : 0000000000000005 s2 : ff5fffffffe00ff9 s3 : ffffffff815cd998 s4 : ffffffff815d0e90 s5 : ffffffff81b0ff28 s6 : 0000000000000020 s7 : ffffffff815d0eb0 s8 : ffffffffffffffff s9 : ff5fffffffe00000 s10: ff5fffffffe01000 s11: 0000000000000022 t3 : 00ffffffaa17db4c t4 : 000000000000000f t5 : 0000000000000001 t6 : 0000000000000000 status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: ff5fffffffe00000 cause: 000000000000000d scan_gray_list+0x12e/0x1a6 kmemleak_scan+0x2aa/0x57e kmemleak_write+0x32a/0x40c full_proxy_write+0x56/0x82 vfs_write+0xa6/0x2a6 ksys_write+0x6c/0xe2 sys_write+0x22/0x2a ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2 The callers may not quite know the actual address they pass(e.g. from devicetree). So the kmemleak_*_phys() apis should guarantee the address they finally use is in lowmem range, so check the address for lowmem's min boundary. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413122925.33856-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-01mm/kmemleak: reset tag when compare object pointerKuan-Ying Lee1-2/+7
When we use HW-tag based kasan and enable vmalloc support, we hit the following bug. It is due to comparison between tagged object and non-tagged pointer. We need to reset the kasan tag when we need to compare tagged object and non-tagged pointer. kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&]Scan area larger than object 0xffffffe77076f440 CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G S W 5.15.25-android13-0-g5cacf919c2bc #1 Hardware name: MT6983(ENG) (DT) Call trace: add_scan_area+0xc4/0x244 kmemleak_scan_area+0x40/0x9c layout_and_allocate+0x1e8/0x288 load_module+0x2c8/0xf00 __se_sys_finit_module+0x190/0x1d0 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x20/0x30 invoke_syscall+0x60/0x170 el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114 do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0 el0_svc+0x60/0xf8 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec el0t_64_sync+0x1b4/0x1b8 kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&]Object 0xf5ffffe77076b000 (size 32768): kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] comm "init", pid 1, jiffies 4294894197 kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] min_count = 0 kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] count = 0 kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] flags = 0x1 kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] checksum = 0 kmemleak: [name:kmemleak&] backtrace: module_alloc+0x9c/0x120 move_module+0x34/0x19c layout_and_allocate+0x1c4/0x288 load_module+0x2c8/0xf00 __se_sys_finit_module+0x190/0x1d0 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x20/0x30 invoke_syscall+0x60/0x170 el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114 do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0 el0_svc+0x60/0xf8 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec el0t_64_sync+0x1b4/0x1b8 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220318034051.30687-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Nicholas Tang <nicholas.tang@mediatek.com> Cc: Yee Lee <yee.lee@mediatek.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-02-04mm/kmemleak: avoid scanning potential huge holesLang Yu1-6/+7
When using devm_request_free_mem_region() and devm_memremap_pages() to add ZONE_DEVICE memory, if requested free mem region's end pfn were huge(e.g., 0x400000000), the node_end_pfn() will be also huge (see move_pfn_range_to_zone()). Thus it creates a huge hole between node_start_pfn() and node_end_pfn(). We found on some AMD APUs, amdkfd requested such a free mem region and created a huge hole. In such a case, following code snippet was just doing busy test_bit() looping on the huge hole. for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) { struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn); if (!page) continue; ... } So we got a soft lockup: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 26s! [bash:1221] CPU: 6 PID: 1221 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.15.0-custom #1 RIP: 0010:pfn_to_online_page+0x5/0xd0 Call Trace: ? kmemleak_scan+0x16a/0x440 kmemleak_write+0x306/0x3a0 ? common_file_perm+0x72/0x170 full_proxy_write+0x5c/0x90 vfs_write+0xb9/0x260 ksys_write+0x67/0xe0 __x64_sys_write+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae I did some tests with the patch. (1) amdgpu module unloaded before the patch: real 0m0.976s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.968s after the patch: real 0m0.981s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.973s (2) amdgpu module loaded before the patch: real 0m35.365s user 0m0.000s sys 0m35.354s after the patch: real 0m1.049s user 0m0.000s sys 0m1.042s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211108140029.721144-1-lang.yu@amd.com Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <lang.yu@amd.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-01-15kmemleak: fix kmemleak false positive report with HW tag-based kasan enableKuan-Ying Lee1-7/+14
With HW tag-based kasan enable, We will get the warning when we free object whose address starts with 0xFF. It is because kmemleak rbtree stores tagged object and this freeing object's tag does not match with rbtree object. In the example below, kmemleak rbtree stores the tagged object in the kmalloc(), and kfree() gets the pointer with 0xFF tag. Call sequence: ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); page = virt_to_page(ptr); offset = offset_in_page(ptr); kfree(page_address(page) + offset); ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); A sequence like that may cause the warning as following: 1) Freeing unknown object: In kfree(), we will get free unknown object warning in kmemleak_free(). Because object(0xFx) in kmemleak rbtree and pointer(0xFF) in kfree() have different tag. 2) Overlap existing: When we allocate that object with the same hw-tag again, we will find the overlap in the kmemleak rbtree and kmemleak thread will be killed. kmemleak: Freeing unknown object at 0xffff000003f88000 CPU: 5 PID: 177 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-dirty #21 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1ac show_stack+0x1c/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 dump_stack+0x1c/0x38 kmemleak_free+0x6c/0x70 slab_free_freelist_hook+0x104/0x200 kmem_cache_free+0xa8/0x3d4 test_version_show+0x270/0x3a0 module_attr_show+0x28/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb0/0x130 kernfs_seq_show+0x30/0x40 seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0 seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0 kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x144/0x1c0 generic_file_splice_read+0xd0/0x184 do_splice_to+0x90/0xe0 splice_direct_to_actor+0xb8/0x250 do_splice_direct+0x88/0xd4 do_sendfile+0x2b0/0x344 __arm64_sys_sendfile64+0x164/0x16c invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec do_el0_svc+0x74/0x90 el0_svc+0x20/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0 el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0 ... kmemleak: Cannot insert 0xf2ff000003f88000 into the object search tree (overlaps existing) CPU: 5 PID: 178 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-dirty #21 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1ac show_stack+0x1c/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 dump_stack+0x1c/0x38 create_object.isra.0+0x2d8/0x2fc kmemleak_alloc+0x34/0x40 kmem_cache_alloc+0x23c/0x2f0 test_version_show+0x1fc/0x3a0 module_attr_show+0x28/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb0/0x130 kernfs_seq_show+0x30/0x40 seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0 kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x144/0x1c0 generic_file_splice_read+0xd0/0x184 do_splice_to+0x90/0xe0 splice_direct_to_actor+0xb8/0x250 do_splice_direct+0x88/0xd4 do_sendfile+0x2b0/0x344 __arm64_sys_sendfile64+0x164/0x16c invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec do_el0_svc+0x74/0x90 el0_svc+0x20/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x1a8/0x1b0 el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0 kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled kmemleak: Object 0xf2ff000003f88000 (size 128): kmemleak: comm "cat", pid 177, jiffies 4294921177 kmemleak: min_count = 1 kmemleak: count = 0 kmemleak: flags = 0x1 kmemleak: checksum = 0 kmemleak: backtrace: kmem_cache_alloc+0x23c/0x2f0 test_version_show+0x1fc/0x3a0 module_attr_show+0x28/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb0/0x130 kernfs_seq_show+0x30/0x40 seq_read_iter+0x1bc/0x4b0 kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x144/0x1c0 generic_file_splice_read+0xd0/0x184 do_splice_to+0x90/0xe0 splice_direct_to_actor+0xb8/0x250 do_splice_direct+0x88/0xd4 do_sendfile+0x2b0/0x344 __arm64_sys_sendfile64+0x164/0x16c invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec do_el0_svc+0x74/0x90 kmemleak: Automatic memory scanning thread ended [akpm@linux-foundation.org: whitespace tweak] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211118054426.4123-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-09mm/kmemleak: allow __GFP_NOLOCKDEP passed to kmemleak's gfpNaohiro Aota1-1/+2
In a memory pressure situation, I'm seeing the lockdep WARNING below. Actually, this is similar to a known false positive which is already addressed by commit 6dcde60efd94 ("xfs: more lockdep whackamole with kmem_alloc*"). This warning still persists because it's not from kmalloc() itself but from an allocation for kmemleak object. While kmalloc() itself suppress the warning with __GFP_NOLOCKDEP, gfp_kmemleak_mask() is dropping the flag for the kmemleak's allocation. Allow __GFP_NOLOCKDEP to be passed to kmemleak's allocation, so that the warning for it is also suppressed. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc7-BTRFS-ZNS+ #37 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/288 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88825ab45df0 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}-{3:3}, at: xfs_ilock+0x8a/0x250 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff848cc1e0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x112/0x160 kmem_cache_alloc+0x48/0x400 create_object.isra.0+0x42/0xb10 kmemleak_alloc+0x48/0x80 __kmalloc+0x228/0x440 kmem_alloc+0xd3/0x2b0 kmem_alloc_large+0x5a/0x1c0 xfs_attr_copy_value+0x112/0x190 xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue+0x1fc/0x300 xfs_attr_get_ilocked+0x125/0x170 xfs_attr_get+0x329/0x450 xfs_get_acl+0x18d/0x430 get_acl.part.0+0xb6/0x1e0 posix_acl_xattr_get+0x13a/0x230 vfs_getxattr+0x21d/0x270 getxattr+0x126/0x310 __x64_sys_fgetxattr+0x1a6/0x2a0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #0 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x2c0f/0x5a00 lock_acquire+0x1a1/0x4b0 down_read_nested+0x50/0x90 xfs_ilock+0x8a/0x250 xfs_can_free_eofblocks+0x34f/0x570 xfs_inactive+0x411/0x520 xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0x2c8/0x710 destroy_inode+0xc5/0x1a0 evict+0x444/0x620 dispose_list+0xfe/0x1c0 prune_icache_sb+0xdc/0x160 super_cache_scan+0x31e/0x510 do_shrink_slab+0x337/0x8e0 shrink_slab+0x362/0x5c0 shrink_node+0x7a7/0x1a40 balance_pgdat+0x64e/0xfe0 kswapd+0x590/0xa80 kthread+0x38c/0x460 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/288: #0: ffffffff848cc1e0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff848a08d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x269/0x5c0 #2: ffff8881a7a820e8 (&type->s_umount_key#60){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x5a/0x510 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210907055659.3182992-1-naohiro.aota@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-08mm: in_irq() cleanupChangbin Du1-1/+1
Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new macro in_hardirq(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210813145245.86070-1-changbin.du@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [kmemleak] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-08-14kasan, kmemleak: reset tags when scanning blockKuan-Ying Lee1-3/+3
Patch series "kasan, slub: reset tag when printing address", v3. With hardware tag-based kasan enabled, we reset the tag when we access metadata to avoid from false alarm. This patch (of 2): Kmemleak needs to scan kernel memory to check memory leak. With hardware tag-based kasan enabled, when it scans on the invalid slab and dereference, the issue will occur as below. Hardware tag-based KASAN doesn't use compiler instrumentation, we can not use kasan_disable_current() to ignore tag check. Based on the below report, there are 11 0xf7 granules, which amounts to 176 bytes, and the object is allocated from the kmalloc-256 cache. So when kmemleak accesses the last 256-176 bytes, it causes faults, as those are marked with KASAN_KMALLOC_REDZONE == KASAN_TAG_INVALID == 0xfe. Thus, we reset tags before accessing metadata to avoid from false positives. BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in scan_block+0x58/0x170 Read at addr f7ff0000c0074eb0 by task kmemleak/138 Pointer tag: [f7], memory tag: [fe] CPU: 7 PID: 138 Comm: kmemleak Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-00001-g8cae8cd89f05-dirty #134 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b0 show_stack+0x1c/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84 print_address_description+0x7c/0x2b4 kasan_report+0x138/0x38c __do_kernel_fault+0x190/0x1c4 do_tag_check_fault+0x78/0x90 do_mem_abort+0x44/0xb4 el1_abort+0x40/0x60 el1h_64_sync_handler+0xb4/0xd0 el1h_64_sync+0x78/0x7c scan_block+0x58/0x170 scan_gray_list+0xdc/0x1a0 kmemleak_scan+0x2ac/0x560 kmemleak_scan_thread+0xb0/0xe0 kthread+0x154/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Allocated by task 0: kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x60 __kasan_kmalloc+0xec/0x104 __kmalloc+0x224/0x3c4 __register_sysctl_paths+0x200/0x290 register_sysctl_table+0x2c/0x40 sysctl_init+0x20/0x34 proc_sys_init+0x3c/0x48 proc_root_init+0x80/0x9c start_kernel+0x648/0x6a4 __primary_switched+0xc0/0xc8 Freed by task 0: kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x60 kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40 kasan_set_free_info+0x44/0x54 ____kasan_slab_free.constprop.0+0x150/0x1b0 __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x20 slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa4/0x1fc kfree+0x1e8/0x30c put_fs_context+0x124/0x220 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x60/0xd4 kern_mount+0x24/0x4c bdev_cache_init+0x70/0x9c vfs_caches_init+0xdc/0xf4 start_kernel+0x638/0x6a4 __primary_switched+0xc0/0xc8 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff0000c0074e00 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-256 of size 256 The buggy address is located 176 bytes inside of 256-byte region [ffff0000c0074e00, ffff0000c0074f00) The buggy address belongs to the page: page:(____ptrval____) refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x100074 head:(____ptrval____) order:2 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0 flags: 0xbfffc0000010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xffff|kasantag=0x0) raw: 0bfffc0000010200 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 f5ff0000c0002300 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff0000c0074c00: f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 fe fe fe fe fe fe fe ffff0000c0074d00: fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe >ffff0000c0074e00: f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 fe fe fe fe fe ^ ffff0000c0074f00: fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe ffff0000c0075000: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ================================================================== Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint kmemleak: 181 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210804090957.12393-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210804090957.12393-2-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Tang <nicholas.tang@mediatek.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-29mm/kmemleak: fix possible wrong memory scanning periodYanfei Xu1-6/+12
This commit contains 3 modifications: 1. Convert the type of jiffies_scan_wait to "unsigned long". 2. Use READ/WRITE_ONCE() for accessing "jiffies_scan_wait". 3. Fix the possible wrong memory scanning period. If you set a large memory scanning period like blow, then the "secs" variable will be non-zero, however the value of "jiffies_scan_wait" will be zero. echo "scan=0x10000000" > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak It is because the type of the msecs_to_jiffies()'s parameter is "unsigned int", and the "secs * 1000" is larger than its max value. This in turn leads a unexpected jiffies_scan_wait, maybe zero. We corret it by replacing kstrtoul() with kstrtouint(), and check the msecs to prevent it larger than UINT_MAX. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210613174022.23044-1-yanfei.xu@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-04-30mm/kmemleak.c: fix a typoBhaskar Chowdhury1-1/+1
s/interruptable/interruptible/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210319214140.23304-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25kfence: make compatible with kmemleakMarco Elver1-1/+2
Because memblock allocations are registered with kmemleak, the KFENCE pool was seen by kmemleak as one large object. Later allocations through kfence_alloc() that were registered with kmemleak via slab_post_alloc_hook() would then overlap and trigger a warning. Therefore, once the pool is initialized, we can remove (free) it from kmemleak again, since it should be treated as allocator-internal and be seen as "free memory". The second problem is that kmemleak is passed the rounded size, and not the originally requested size, which is also the size of KFENCE objects. To avoid kmemleak scanning past the end of an object and trigger a KFENCE out-of-bounds error, fix the size if it is a KFENCE object. For simplicity, to avoid a call to kfence_ksize() in slab_post_alloc_hook() (and avoid new IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK) guard), just call kfence_ksize() in mm/kmemleak.c:create_object(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210317084740.3099921-1-elver@google.com Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reported-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-14mm/kmemleak: rely on rcu for task stack scanningDavidlohr Bueso1-4/+4
kmemleak_scan() currently relies on the big tasklist_lock hammer to stabilize iterating through the tasklist. Instead, this patch proposes simply using rcu along with the rcu-safe for_each_process_thread flavor (without changing scan semantics), which doesn't make use of next_thread/p->thread_group and thus cannot race with exit. Furthermore, any races with fork() and not seeing the new child should be benign as it's not running yet and can also be detected by the next scan. Avoiding the tasklist_lock could prove beneficial for performance considering the scan operation is done periodically. I have seen improvements of 30%-ish when doing similar replacements on very pathological microbenchmarks (ie stressing get/setpriority(2)). However my main motivation is that it's one less user of the global lock, something that Linus has long time wanted to see gone eventually (if ever) even if the traditional fairness issues has been dealt with now with qrwlocks. Of course this is a very long ways ahead. This patch also kills another user of the deprecated tsk->thread_group. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200820203902.11308-1-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-15mm/kmemleak: silence KCSAN splats in checksumQian Cai1-0/+2
Even if KCSAN is disabled for kmemleak, update_checksum() could still call crc32() (which is outside of kmemleak.c) to dereference object->pointer. Thus, the value of object->pointer could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in crc32_le_base / do_raw_spin_lock write to 0xffffb0ea683a7d50 of 4 bytes by task 23575 on cpu 12: do_raw_spin_lock+0x114/0x200 debug_spin_lock_after at kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:91 (inlined by) do_raw_spin_lock at kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:115 _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 __handle_mm_fault+0xa9e/0xd00 handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0 do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9 page_fault+0x34/0x40 read to 0xffffb0ea683a7d50 of 4 bytes by task 839 on cpu 60: crc32_le_base+0x67/0x350 crc32_le_base+0x67/0x350: crc32_body at lib/crc32.c:106 (inlined by) crc32_le_generic at lib/crc32.c:179 (inlined by) crc32_le at lib/crc32.c:197 kmemleak_scan+0x528/0xd90 update_checksum at mm/kmemleak.c:1172 (inlined by) kmemleak_scan at mm/kmemleak.c:1497 kmemleak_scan_thread+0xcc/0xfa kthread+0x1e0/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 If a shattered value was returned due to a data race, it will be corrected in the next scan. Thus, let KCSAN ignore all reads in the region to silence KCSAN in case the write side is non-atomic. Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200317182754.2180-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02mm/kmemleak.c: use address-of operator on section symbolsNathan Chancellor1-1/+1
Clang warns: mm/kmemleak.c:1955:28: warning: array comparison always evaluates to a constant [-Wtautological-compare] if (__start_ro_after_init < _sdata || __end_ro_after_init > _edata) ^ mm/kmemleak.c:1955:60: warning: array comparison always evaluates to a constant [-Wtautological-compare] if (__start_ro_after_init < _sdata || __end_ro_after_init > _edata) These are not true arrays, they are linker defined symbols, which are just addresses. Using the address of operator silences the warning and does not change the resulting assembly with either clang/ld.lld or gcc/ld (tested with diff + objdump -Dr). Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/895 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220051551.44000-1-natechancellor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-31mm/kmemleak: turn kmemleak_lock and object->lock to raw_spinlock_tHe Zhe1-56/+56
kmemleak_lock as a rwlock on RT can possibly be acquired in atomic context which does work. Since the kmemleak operation is performed in atomic context make it a raw_spinlock_t so it can also be acquired on RT. This is used for debugging and is not enabled by default in a production like environment (where performance/latency matters) so it makes sense to make it a raw_spinlock_t instead trying to get rid of the atomic context. Turn also the kmemleak_object->lock into raw_spinlock_t which is acquired (nested) while the kmemleak_lock is held. The time spent in "echo scan > kmemleak" slightly improved on 64core box with this patch applied after boot. [bigeasy@linutronix.de: redo the description, update comments. Merge the individual bits: He Zhe did the kmemleak_lock, Liu Haitao the ->lock and Yongxin Liu forwarded Liu's patch.] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191219170834.4tah3prf2gdothz4@linutronix.de Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218150744.GB20197@arrakis.emea.arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542877459-144382-1-git-send-email-zhe.he@windriver.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927082230.34152-1-yongxin.liu@windriver.com Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Haitao <haitao.liu@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-10-14kmemleak: Do not corrupt the object_list during clean-upCatalin Marinas1-9/+21
In case of an error (e.g. memory pool too small), kmemleak disables itself and cleans up the already allocated metadata objects. However, if this happens early before the RCU callback mechanism is available, put_object() skips call_rcu() and frees the object directly. This is not safe with the RCU list traversal in __kmemleak_do_cleanup(). Change the list traversal in __kmemleak_do_cleanup() to list_for_each_entry_safe() and remove the rcu_read_{lock,unlock} since the kmemleak is already disabled at this point. In addition, avoid an unnecessary metadata object rb-tree look-up since it already has the struct kmemleak_object pointer. Fixes: c5665868183f ("mm: kmemleak: use the memory pool for early allocations") Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-25mm/kmemleak.c: record the current memory pool sizeQian Cai1-1/+2
The only way to obtain the current memory pool size for a running kernel is to check the kernel config file which is inconvenient. Record it in the kernel messages. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/memory pool size/memory pool/available/, per Catalin] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1565809631-28933-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-25mm: kmemleak: use the memory pool for early allocationsCatalin Marinas1-239/+26
Currently kmemleak uses a static early_log buffer to trace all memory allocation/freeing before the slab allocator is initialised. Such early log is replayed during kmemleak_init() to properly initialise the kmemleak metadata for objects allocated up that point. With a memory pool that does not rely on the slab allocator, it is possible to skip this early log entirely. In order to remove the early logging, consider kmemleak_enabled == 1 by default while the kmem_cache availability is checked directly on the object_cache and scan_area_cache variables. The RCU callback is only invoked after object_cache has been initialised as we wouldn't have any concurrent list traversal before this. In order to reduce the number of callbacks before kmemleak is fully initialised, move the kmemleak_init() call to mm_init(). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove WARN_ON(), per Catalin] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190812160642.52134-4-catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-25mm: kmemleak: simple memory allocation pool for kmemleak objectsCatalin Marinas1-2/+52
Add a memory pool for struct kmemleak_object in case the normal kmem_cache_alloc() fails under the gfp constraints passed by the caller. The mem_pool[] array size is currently fixed at 16000. We are not using the existing mempool kernel API since this requires the slab allocator to be available (for pool->elements allocation). A subsequent kmemleak patch will replace the static early log buffer with the pool allocation introduced here and this functionality is required to be available before the slab was initialised. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190812160642.52134-3-catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-25mm: kmemleak: make the tool tolerant to struct scan_area allocation failuresCatalin Marinas1-6/+10
Patch series "mm: kmemleak: Use a memory pool for kmemleak object allocations", v3. Following the discussions on v2 of this patch(set) [1], this series takes slightly different approach: - it implements its own simple memory pool that does not rely on the slab allocator - drops the early log buffer logic entirely since it can now allocate metadata from the memory pool directly before kmemleak is fully initialised - CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE option is renamed to CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_MEM_POOL_SIZE - moves the kmemleak_init() call earlier (mm_init()) - to avoid a separate memory pool for struct scan_area, it makes the tool robust when such allocations fail as scan areas are rather an optimisation [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190727132334.9184-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com This patch (of 3): Object scan areas are an optimisation aimed to decrease the false positives and slightly improve the scanning time of large objects known to only have a few specific pointers. If a struct scan_area fails to allocate, kmemleak can still function normally by scanning the full object. Introduce an OBJECT_FULL_SCAN flag and mark objects as such when scan_area allocation fails. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190812160642.52134-2-catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-08-14mm: kmemleak: disable early logging in case of errorCatalin Marinas1-1/+1
If an error occurs during kmemleak_init() (e.g. kmem cache cannot be created), kmemleak is disabled but kmemleak_early_log remains enabled. Subsequently, when the .init.text section is freed, the log_early() function no longer exists. To avoid a page fault in such scenario, ensure that kmemleak_disable() also disables early logging. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190731152302.42073-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>