| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The test: 'mask > (typeof(_reg))~0ull' only works correctly when both
sides are unsigned, consider:
- 0xff000000 vs (int)~0ull
- 0x000000ff vs (int)~0ull
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211110101324.950210584@infradead.org
|
|
When ur_load_imm_any() is inlined into jeq_imm(), it's possible for the
compiler to deduce a case where _val can only have the value of -1 at
compile time. Specifically,
/* struct bpf_insn: _s32 imm */
u64 imm = insn->imm; /* sign extend */
if (imm >> 32) { /* non-zero only if insn->imm is negative */
/* inlined from ur_load_imm_any */
u32 __imm = imm >> 32; /* therefore, always 0xffffffff */
if (__builtin_constant_p(__imm) && __imm > 255)
compiletime_assert_XXX()
This can result in tripping a BUILD_BUG_ON() in __BF_FIELD_CHECK() that
checks that a given value is representable in one byte (interpreted as
unsigned).
FIELD_FIT() should return true or false at runtime for whether a value
can fit for not. Don't break the build over a value that's too large for
the mask. We'd prefer to keep the inlining and compiler optimizations
though we know this case will always return false.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1697599ee301a ("bitfield.h: add FIELD_FIT() helper")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/CAK7LNASvb0UDJ0U5wkYYRzTAdnEs64HjXpEUL7d=V0CXiAXcNw@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Debugged-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Define FIELD_MAX(), which supplies the maximum value that can be
represented by a field value. Define field_max() as well, to go
along with the lower-case forms of the field mask functions.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation this program is
distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 655 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070034.575739538@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Passing an enum into FIELD_GET() produces a long but harmless warning on
newer compilers:
from include/linux/linkage.h:7,
from include/linux/kernel.h:7,
from include/linux/skbuff.h:17,
from include/linux/if_ether.h:23,
from include/linux/etherdevice.h:25,
from drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:63:
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c: In function 'iwl_mvm_rx_mpdu_mq':
include/linux/bitfield.h:56:20: error: enum constant in boolean context [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!(_mask), _pfx "mask is zero"); \
^
...
include/linux/bitfield.h:103:3: note: in expansion of macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
__BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, _reg, 0U, "FIELD_GET: "); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:1025:21: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_GET'
le16_encode_bits(FIELD_GET(IWL_RX_HE_PHY_SIBG_SYM_OR_USER_NUM_MASK,
The problem here is that the caller has no idea how the macro gets
expanding, leading to a false-positive. It can be trivially avoided by
doing a comparison against zero.
This only recently started appearing as the iwlwifi driver was patched
to use FIELD_GET.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180813220950.194841-1-arnd@arndb.de
Fixes: 514c30696fbc ("iwlwifi: add support for IEEE802.11ax")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
There's no reason why we shouldn't pack/unpack bits into/from
u8 values/registers/etc., so add u8 helpers.
Use the ____MAKE_OP() macro directly to avoid having nonsense
le8_encode_bits() and similar functions.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
There's a bug in *_encode_bits() in using ~field_multiplier() for
the check whether or not the constant value fits into the field,
this is wrong and clearly ~field_mask() was intended. This was
triggering for me for both constant and non-constant values.
Additionally, make this case actually into an compile error.
Declaring the extern function that will never exist with just a
warning is pointless as then later we'll just get a link error.
While at it, also fix the indentation in those lines I'm touching.
Finally, as suggested by Andy Shevchenko, add some tests and for
that introduce also u8 helpers. The tests don't compile without
the fix, showing that it's necessary.
Fixes: 00b0c9b82663 ("Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian.")
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The following primitives are defined in linux/bitfield.h:
* u32 le32_get_bits(__le32 val, u32 field) extracts the contents of the
bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit object @val and
converts it to host-endian.
* void le32p_replace_bits(__le32 *p, u32 v, u32 field) replaces
the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian
32bit object pointed to by @p with the value of @v. New value is
given in host-endian and stored as little-endian.
* __le32 le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, u32 field) is equivalent to
({__le32 tmp = old; le32p_replace_bits(&tmp, v, field); tmp;})
In other words, instead of modifying an object in memory, it takes
the initial value and returns the modified one.
* __le32 le32_encode_bits(u32 v, u32 field) is equivalent to
le32_replace_bits(0, v, field). In other words, it returns a little-endian
32bit object with the bitfield specified by @field containing the
value of @v and all bits outside that bitfield being zero.
Such set of helpers is defined for each of little-, big- and host-endian
types; e.g. u64_get_bits(val, field) will return the contents of the bitfield
specified by @field in host-endian 64bit object @val, etc. Of course, for
host-endian no conversion is involved.
Fields to access are specified as GENMASK() values - an N-bit field
starting at bit #M is encoded as GENMASK(M + N - 1, M). Note that
bit numbers refer to endianness of the object we are working with -
e.g. GENMASK(11, 0) in __be16 refers to the second byte and the lower
4 bits of the first byte. In __le16 it would refer to the first byte
and the lower 4 bits of the second byte, etc.
Field specification must be a constant; __builtin_constant_p() doesn't
have to be true for it, but compiler must be able to evaluate it at
build time. If it cannot or if the value does not encode any bitfield,
the build will fail.
If the value being stored in a bitfield is a constant that does not fit
into that bitfield, a warning will be generated at compile time.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Since commit bc6245e5efd7 ("bug: split BUILD_BUG stuff out into
<linux/build_bug.h>"), #include <linux/build_bug.h> is better to pull
minimal headers needed for BUILG_BUG() family.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1505700775-19826-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: Dinan Gunawardena <dinan.gunawardena@netronome.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
I do not see anything that restricts this macro to 32 bit width.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1505921975-23379-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Add a helper for checking at runtime that a value will fit inside
a specified field/mask.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Common approach to accessing register fields is to define
structures or sets of macros containing mask and shift pair.
Operations on the register are then performed as follows:
field = (reg >> shift) & mask;
reg &= ~(mask << shift);
reg |= (field & mask) << shift;
Defining shift and mask separately is tedious. Ivo van Doorn
came up with an idea of computing them at compilation time
based on a single shifted mask (later refined by Felix) which
can be used like this:
#define REG_FIELD 0x000ff000
field = FIELD_GET(REG_FIELD, reg);
reg &= ~REG_FIELD;
reg |= FIELD_PREP(REG_FIELD, field);
FIELD_{GET,PREP} macros take care of finding out what the
appropriate shift is based on compilation time ffs operation.
GENMASK can be used to define registers (which is usually
less error-prone and easier to match with datasheets).
This approach is the most convenient I've seen so to limit code
multiplication let's move the macros to a global header file.
Attempts to use static inlines instead of macros failed due
to false positive triggering of BUILD_BUG_ON()s, especially with
GCC < 6.0.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dinan Gunawardena <dinan.gunawardena@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
