summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-08-06btrfs: unify end_io callbacks of async_submit_bioDavid Sterba4-35/+9
The end_io callbacks passed to btrfs_wq_submit_bio (btrfs_submit_bio_done and btree_submit_bio_done) are effectively the same code, there's no point to do the indirection. Export btrfs_submit_bio_done and call it directly. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: remove unused member async_submit_bio::bio_flagsDavid Sterba1-2/+0
After splitting the start and end hooks in a758781d4b76c3 ("btrfs: separate types for submit_bio_start and submit_bio_done"), some of the function arguments were dropped but not removed from the structure. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: remove unused member async_submit_bio::fs_infoDavid Sterba1-2/+0
Introduced by c6100a4b4e3d1 ("Btrfs: replace tree->mapping with tree->private_data") to be used in run_one_async_done where it got unused after 736cd52e0c720103 ("Btrfs: remove nr_async_submits and async_submit_draining"). Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: validate type when reading a chunkGu Jinxiang1-0/+28
Reported in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839, with an image that has an invalid chunk type but does not return an error. Add chunk type check in btrfs_check_chunk_valid, to detect the wrong type combinations. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839 Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Rename EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY to EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPEDNikolay Borisov3-8/+8
EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY is an awful name for this flag. Buffers which have this flag set are not in any way dummy. Rather, they are private in the sense that are not mapped and linked to the global buffer tree. This flag has subtle implications to the way free_extent_buffer works for example, as well as controls whether page->mapping->private_lock is held during extent_buffer release. Pages for an unmapped buffer cannot be under io, nor can they be written by a 3rd party so taking the lock is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Document locking requirement via lockdep_assert_heldNikolay Borisov1-1/+2
Remove stale comment since there is no longer an eb->eb_lock and document the locking expectation with a lockdep_assert_held statement. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: rename btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pageDavid Sterba1-4/+4
The function used to release one page (and always the first one), but not anymore since a50924e3a4d7fccb0ecfbd4 ("btrfs: drop constant param from btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page"). Update the name and comment. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Refactor loop in btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pageNikolay Borisov1-9/+6
The purpose of the function is to free all the pages comprising an extent buffer. This can be achieved with a simple for loop rather than the slightly more involved 'do {} while' construct. So rewrite the loop using a 'for' construct. Additionally we can never have an extent_buffer that has 0 pages so remove the check for index == 0. No functional changes. The reversed order used to have a meaning in the past where the first page served as a blocking point for several callers. See eg 4f2de97acee6532b36dd6e99 ("Btrfs: set page->private to the eb"). Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Reword dodgy comments in alloc_extent_bufferNikolay Borisov1-9/+8
Commit eb14ab8ed24a ("Btrfs: fix page->private races") fixed a genuine race between extent buffer initialisation and btree_releasepage. Unfortunately as the code has evolved the comments weren't changed which made them slightly wrong and they weren't very clear in the fist place. Fix this by (hopefully) rewording them in a more approachable manner. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Simplify page unlocking in alloc_extent_bufferNikolay Borisov1-7/+2
Current version of the page unlocking code was added in 727011e07cbd ("Btrfs: allow metadata blocks larger than the page size") but even in this commit that particular flag was never used per-se. In fact, btrfs only uses PageChecked for data pages to identify pages which have been dirtied but don't have ORDERED bit set. For more information see 247e743cbe6e ("Btrfs: Use async helpers to deal with pages that have been improperly dirtied"). However, this doesn't apply to extent buffer pages. The important bit here is that the pages are unlocked AFTER the extent buffer has been properly recorded in the radix tree to avoid races with btree_releasepage. Let's exploit this fact and simplify the page unlocking sequence by unlocking the pages in-order and removing the redundant PageChecked flag setting/clearing. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: scrub: cleanup the remaining nodatasum fixup codeQu Wenruo1-289/+0
Remove the remaining code that misused the page cache pages during device replace and could cause data corruption for compressed nodatasum extents. Such files do not normally exist but there's a bug that allows this combination and the corruption was exposed by device replace fixup code. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: refactor block group replication factor calculation to a helperDavid Sterba4-36/+24
There are many places that open code the duplicity factor of the block group profiles, create a common helper. This can be easily extended for more copies. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: use the assigned fs_devices instead of the dereferenceAnand Jain1-2/+2
We have assigned the %fs_info->fs_devices in %fs_devices as its not modified just use it for the mutex_lock(). Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from qgroup_rescan_leafLu Fengqi1-4/+4
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_qgroup_inheritLu Fengqi4-9/+7
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_run_qgroupsLu Fengqi4-6/+5
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_qgroup_account_extentLu Fengqi3-25/+23
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop root parameter from btrfs_qgroup_trace_subtreeLu Fengqi4-7/+4
The fs_info can be fetched from the transaction handle directly. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_qgroup_trace_leaf_itemsLu Fengqi3-6/+5
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extentLu Fengqi3-13/+9
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. In addition, remove the WARN_ON(trans == NULL) because it's not possible to hit this condition. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_limit_qgroupLu Fengqi3-6/+4
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_remove_qgroupLu Fengqi3-6/+4
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_create_qgroupLu Fengqi4-7/+6
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_del_qgroup_relationLu Fengqi3-6/+6
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from __del_qgroup_relationLu Fengqi1-6/+6
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop fs_info parameter from btrfs_add_qgroup_relationLu Fengqi3-6/+6
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop quota_root and fs_info parameters from ↵Lu Fengqi1-6/+6
update_qgroup_status_item They can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop root parameter from update_qgroup_info_itemLu Fengqi1-4/+5
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop root parameter from update_qgroup_limit_itemLu Fengqi1-5/+5
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop quota_root parameter from del_qgroup_itemLu Fengqi1-3/+3
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop quota_root parameter from del_qgroup_relation_itemLu Fengqi1-6/+6
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: Drop quota_root parameter from add_qgroup_relation_itemLu Fengqi1-9/+9
It can be fetched from the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: rename btrfs_parse_early_optionsAnand Jain1-7/+6
Rename btrfs_parse_early_options() to btrfs_parse_device_options(). As btrfs_parse_early_options() parses the -o device options and scan the device provided. So this rename specifies its action. Also the function name is in line with btrfs_parse_subvol_options(). No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: qgroup: cleanup the unused srcroot from btrfs_qgroup_inheritLu Fengqi1-16/+1
Since commit 0b246afa62b0 ("btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables"), the srcroot is no longer used to get fs_info::nodesize. In fact, it can be dropped after commit 707e8a071528 ("btrfs: use nodesize everywhere, kill leafsize"). Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Use btrfs_mark_bg_unused to replace open codeQu Wenruo3-27/+19
Introduce a small helper, btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), to acquire locks and add a block group to unused_bgs list. No functional modification, and only 3 callers are involved. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: Rewrite retry logic in do_chunk_allocNikolay Borisov1-37/+37
do_chunk_alloc implements logic to detect whether there is currently pending chunk allocation (by means of space_info->chunk_alloc being set) and if so it loops around to the 'again' label. Additionally, based on the state of the space_info (e.g. whether it's full or not) and the return value of should_alloc_chunk() it decides whether this is a "hard" error (ENOSPC) or we can just return 0. This patch refactors all of this: 1. Put order to the scattered ifs handling the various cases in an easy-to-read if {} else if{} branches. This makes clear the various cases we are interested in handling. 2. Call should_alloc_chunk only once and use the result in the if/else if constructs. All of this is done under space_info->lock, so even before multiple calls of should_alloc_chunk were unnecessary. 3. Rewrite the "do {} while()" loop currently implemented via label into an explicit loop construct. 4. Move the mutex locking for the case where the caller is the one doing the allocation. For the case where the caller needs to wait a concurrent allocation, introduce a pair of mutex_lock/mutex_unlock to act as a barrier and reword the comment. 5. Switch local vars to bool type where pertinent. All in all this shouldn't introduce any functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: use customized batch size for total_bytes_pinnedEthan Lien2-15/+32
In commit b150a4f10d878 ("Btrfs: use a percpu to keep track of possibly pinned bytes") we use total_bytes_pinned to track how many bytes we are going to free in this transaction. When we are close to ENOSPC, we check it and know if we can make the allocation by commit the current transaction. For every data/metadata extent we are going to free, we add total_bytes_pinned in btrfs_free_extent() and btrfs_free_tree_block(), and release it in unpin_extent_range() when we finish the transaction. So this is a variable we frequently update but rarely read - just the suitable use of percpu_counter. But in previous commit we update total_bytes_pinned by default 32 batch size, making every update essentially a spin lock protected update. Since every spin lock/unlock operation involves syncing a globally used variable and some kind of barrier in a SMP system, this is more expensive than using total_bytes_pinned as a simple atomic64_t. So fix this by using a customized batch size. Since we only read total_bytes_pinned when we are close to ENOSPC and fail to allocate new chunk, we can use a really large batch size and have nearly no penalty in most cases. [Test] We tested the patch on a 4-cores x86 machine: 1. fallocate a 16GiB size test file 2. take snapshot (so all following writes will be COW) 3. run a 180 sec, 4 jobs, 4K random write fio on test file We also added a temporary lockdep class on percpu_counter's spin lock used by total_bytes_pinned to track it by lock_stat. [Results] unpatched: lock_stat version 0.4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg total_bytes_pinned_percpu: 82 82 0.21 0.61 29.46 0.36 298340 635973 0.09 11.01 173476.25 0.27 patched: lock_stat version 0.4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg total_bytes_pinned_percpu: 1 1 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 13601 31542 0.14 9.61 11016.90 0.35 [Analysis] Since the spin lock only protects a single in-memory variable, the contentions (number of lock acquisitions that had to wait) in both unpatched and patched version are low. But when we see acquisitions and acq-bounces, we get much lower counts in patched version. Here the most important metric is acq-bounces. It means how many times the lock gets transferred between different cpus, so the patch can really reduce cacheline bouncing of spin lock (also the global counter of percpu_counter) in a SMP system. Fixes: b150a4f10d878 ("Btrfs: use a percpu to keep track of possibly pinned bytes") Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytesEthan Lien1-4/+6
We use customized, nodesize batch value to update dirty_metadata_bytes. We should also use batch version of compare function or we will easily goto fast path and get false result from percpu_counter_compare(). Fixes: e2d845211eda ("Btrfs: use percpu counter for dirty metadata count") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: return device pointer from btrfs_scan_one_deviceGu Jinxiang3-26/+30
Return device pointer (with the IS_ERR semantics) from btrfs_scan_one_device so we don't have to return in through pointer. And since btrfs_fs_devices can be obtained from btrfs_device, return that. Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ fixed conflics after recent changes to btrfs_scan_one_device ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: make fs_devices a local variable in btrfs_parse_early_optionsGu Jinxiang1-3/+4
fs_devices is always passed to btrfs_scan_one_device which overrides it. In the call stack below fs_devices is passed to btrfs_scan_one_device from btrfs_mount_root. In btrfs_mount_root the output fs_devices of this call stack is not used. btrfs_mount_root btrfs_parse_early_options btrfs_scan_one_device So, it is not necessary to pass fs_devices from btrfs_mount_root, using a local variable in btrfs_parse_early_options is enough. Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: fix mount and ioctl device scan ioctl raceDavid Sterba1-6/+6
Technically this extends the critical section covered by uuid_mutex to: - parse early mount options -- here we can call device scan on paths that can be passed as 'device=/dev/...' - scan the device passed to mount - open the devices related to the fs_devices -- this increases fs_devices::opened The race can happen when mount calls one of the scans and there's another one called eg. by mkfs or 'btrfs dev scan': Mount Scan ----- ---- scan_one_device (dev1, fsid1) scan_one_device (dev2, fsid1) add the device free stale devices fsid1 fs_devices::opened == 0 find fsid1:dev1 free fsid1:dev1 if it's the last one, free fs_devices of fsid1 too open_devices (dev1, fsid1) dev1 not found When fixed, the uuid mutex will make sure that mount will increase fs_devices::opened and this will not be touched by the racing scan ioctl. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+909a5177749d7990ffa4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+ceb2606025ec1cc3479c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: reorder initialization before the mount locks uuid_mutexDavid Sterba1-16/+14
In preparation to take a big lock, move resource initialization before the critical section. It's not obvious from the diff, the desired order is: - initialize mount security options - allocate temporary fs_info - allocate superblock buffers Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: lift uuid_mutex to callers of btrfs_parse_early_optionsDavid Sterba1-2/+4
Prepartory work to fix race between mount and device scan. btrfs_parse_early_options calls the device scan from mount and we'll need to let mount completely manage the critical section. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: lift uuid_mutex to callers of btrfs_open_devicesDavid Sterba2-2/+4
Prepartory work to fix race between mount and device scan. The callers will have to manage the critical section, eg. mount wants to scan and then call btrfs_open_devices without the ioctl scan walking in and modifying the fs devices in the meantime. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: lift uuid_mutex to callers of btrfs_scan_one_deviceDavid Sterba2-3/+13
Prepartory work to fix race between mount and device scan. The callers will have to manage the critical section, eg. mount wants to scan and then call btrfs_open_devices without the ioctl scan walking in and modifying the fs devices in the meantime. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: use device_list_mutex when removing stale devicesAnand Jain1-10/+15
btrfs_free_stale_devices() finds a stale (not opened) device matching path in the fs_uuid list. We are already under uuid_mutex so when we check for each fs_devices, hold the device_list_mutex too. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: rename local devices for fs_devices in btrfs_free_stale_devices(Anand Jain1-18/+17
Over the years we named %fs_devices and %devices to represent the struct btrfs_fs_devices and the struct btrfs_device. So follow the same scheme here too. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: extend locked section when adding a new device in device_list_addAnand Jain1-4/+12
Make sure the device_list_lock is held the whole time: * when the device is being looked up * new device is initialized and put to the list * the list counters are updated (fs_devices::opened, fs_devices::total_devices) Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [ update changelog ] Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: do btrfs_free_stale_devices outside of device_list_addAnand Jain1-5/+10
btrfs_free_stale_devices() looks for device path reused for another filesystem, and deletes the older fs_devices::device entry. In preparation to handle locking in device_list_add, move btrfs_free_stale_devices outside as these two functions serve a different purpose. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06btrfs: close devices without offloading to a temporary listNikolay Borisov1-20/+6
Since commit 88c14590cdd6 ("btrfs: use RCU in btrfs_show_devname for device list traversal") btrfs_show_devname no longer takes device_list_mutex. As such the deadlock that 0ccd05285e7f ("btrfs: fix a possible umount deadlock") aimed to fix no longer exists, we can free the devices immediatelly and remove the code that does the pending work. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> [ update changelog ] Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>