summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-07-30Btrfs: fix race leading to fs corruption after transaction abortFilipe Manana1-0/+10
When one transaction is finishing its commit, it is possible for another transaction to start and enter its initial commit phase as well. If the first ends up getting aborted, we have a small time window where the second transaction commit does not notice that the previous transaction aborted and ends up committing, writing a superblock that points to btrees that reference extent buffers (nodes and leafs) that were not persisted to disk. The consequence is that after mounting the filesystem again, we will be unable to load some btree nodes/leafs, either because the content on disk is either garbage (or just zeroes) or corresponds to the old content of a previouly COWed or deleted node/leaf, resulting in the well known error messages "parent transid verify failed on ...". The following sequence diagram illustrates how this can happen. CPU 1 CPU 2 <at transaction N> btrfs_commit_transaction() (...) --> sets transaction state to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED --> sets fs_info->running_transaction to NULL (...) btrfs_start_transaction() start_transaction() wait_current_trans() --> returns immediately because fs_info->running_transaction is NULL join_transaction() --> creates transaction N + 1 --> sets fs_info->running_transaction to transaction N + 1 --> adds transaction N + 1 to the fs_info->trans_list list --> returns transaction handle pointing to the new transaction N + 1 (...) btrfs_sync_file() btrfs_start_transaction() --> returns handle to transaction N + 1 (...) btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() --> writeback of some extent buffer fails, returns an error btrfs_handle_fs_error() --> sets BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR in fs_info->fs_state --> jumps to label "scrub_continue" cleanup_transaction() btrfs_abort_transaction(N) --> sets BTRFS_FS_STATE_TRANS_ABORTED flag in fs_info->fs_state --> sets aborted field in the transaction and transaction handle structures, for transaction N only --> removes transaction from the list fs_info->trans_list btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1) --> transaction N + 1 was not aborted, so it proceeds (...) --> sets the transaction's state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START --> does not find the previous transaction (N) in the fs_info->trans_list, so it doesn't know that transaction was aborted, and the commit of transaction N + 1 proceeds (...) --> sets transaction N + 1 state to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() --> succeeds writing all extent buffers created in the transaction N + 1 write_all_supers() --> succeeds --> we now have a superblock on disk that points to trees that refer to at least one extent buffer that was never persisted So fix this by updating the transaction commit path to check if the flag BTRFS_FS_STATE_TRANS_ABORTED is set on fs_info->fs_state if after setting the transaction to the TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START we do not find any previous transaction in the fs_info->trans_list. If the flag is set, just fail the transaction commit with -EROFS, as we do in other places. The exact error code for the previous transaction abort was already logged and reported. Fixes: 49b25e0540904b ("btrfs: enhance transaction abort infrastructure") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-30Btrfs: fix incremental send failure after deduplicationFilipe Manana1-62/+15
When doing an incremental send operation we can fail if we previously did deduplication operations against a file that exists in both snapshots. In that case we will fail the send operation with -EIO and print a message to dmesg/syslog like the following: BTRFS error (device sdc): Send: inconsistent snapshot, found updated \ extent for inode 257 without updated inode item, send root is 258, \ parent root is 257 This requires that we deduplicate to the same file in both snapshots for the same amount of times on each snapshot. The issue happens because a deduplication only updates the iversion of an inode and does not update any other field of the inode, therefore if we deduplicate the file on each snapshot for the same amount of time, the inode will have the same iversion value (stored as the "sequence" field on the inode item) on both snapshots, therefore it will be seen as unchanged between in the send snapshot while there are new/updated/deleted extent items when comparing to the parent snapshot. This makes the send operation return -EIO and print an error message. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt # Create our first file. The first half of the file has several 64Kb # extents while the second half as a single 512Kb extent. $ xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 -b 64K 0 512K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 512K 512K" /mnt/foo # Create the base snapshot and the parent send stream from it. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1 # Create our second file, that has exactly the same data as the first # file. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 0 1M" /mnt/bar # Create the second snapshot, used for the incremental send, before # doing the file deduplication. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 # Now before creating the incremental send stream: # # 1) Deduplicate into a subrange of file foo in snapshot mysnap1. This # will drop several extent items and add a new one, also updating # the inode's iversion (sequence field in inode item) by 1, but not # any other field of the inode; # # 2) Deduplicate into a different subrange of file foo in snapshot # mysnap2. This will replace an extent item with a new one, also # updating the inode's iversion by 1 but not any other field of the # inode. # # After these two deduplication operations, the inode items, for file # foo, are identical in both snapshots, but we have different extent # items for this inode in both snapshots. We want to check this doesn't # cause send to fail with an error or produce an incorrect stream. $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 0 0 512K" /mnt/mysnap1/foo $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 512K 512K 512K" /mnt/mysnap2/foo # Create the incremental send stream. $ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/mysnap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error This issue started happening back in 2015 when deduplication was updated to not update the inode's ctime and mtime and update only the iversion. Back then we would hit a BUG_ON() in send, but later in 2016 send was updated to return -EIO and print the error message instead of doing the BUG_ON(). A test case for fstests follows soon. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203933 Fixes: 1c919a5e13702c ("btrfs: don't update mtime/ctime on deduped inodes") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-26btrfs: fix extent_state leak in btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_rangeNaohiro Aota1-5/+6
btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range() loads given "*cached_state" into cachedp, which, in general, is NULL. Then, lock_extent_bits() updates "cachedp", but it never goes backs to the caller. Thus the caller still see its "cached_state" to be NULL and never free the state allocated under btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(). As a result, we will see massive state leak with e.g. fstests btrfs/005. Fix this bug by properly handling the pointers. Fixes: bd80d94efb83 ("btrfs: Always use a cached extent_state in btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range") Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-25btrfs: Fix deadlock caused by missing memory barrierNikolay Borisov1-3/+6
Commit 06297d8cefca ("btrfs: switch extent_buffer blocking_writers from atomic to int") changed the type of blocking_writers but forgot to adjust relevant code in btrfs_tree_unlock by converting the smp_mb__after_atomic to smp_mb. This opened up the possibility of a deadlock due to re-ordering of setting blocking_writers and checking/waking up the waiter. This particular lockup is explained in a comment above waitqueue_active() function. Fix it by converting the memory barrier to a full smp_mb, accounting for the fact that blocking_writers is a simple integer. Fixes: 06297d8cefca ("btrfs: switch extent_buffer blocking_writers from atomic to int") Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-17btrfs: don't leak extent_map in btrfs_get_io_geometry()Johannes Thumshirn1-3/+7
btrfs_get_io_geometry() calls btrfs_get_chunk_map() to acquire a reference on a extent_map, but on normal operation it does not drop this reference anymore. This leads to excessive kmemleak reports. Always call free_extent_map(), not just in the error case. Fixes: 5f1411265e16 ("btrfs: Introduce btrfs_io_geometry infrastructure") Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-17btrfs: free checksum hash on in close_ctreeJohannes Thumshirn1-0/+1
fs_info::csum_hash gets initialized in btrfs_init_csum_hash() which is called by open_ctree(). But it only gets freed if open_ctree() fails, not on normal operation. This leads to a memory leak like the following found by kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff888132cb8720 (size 96): comm "mount", pid 450, jiffies 4294912436 (age 17.584s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000000c9643d4>] crypto_create_tfm+0x2d/0xd0 [<00000000ae577f68>] crypto_alloc_tfm+0x4b/0xb0 [<000000002b5cdf30>] open_ctree+0xb84/0x2060 [btrfs] [<0000000043204297>] btrfs_mount_root+0x552/0x640 [btrfs] [<00000000c99b10ea>] legacy_get_tree+0x22/0x40 [<0000000071a6495f>] vfs_get_tree+0x1f/0xc0 [<00000000f180080e>] fc_mount+0x9/0x30 [<000000009e36cebd>] vfs_kern_mount.part.11+0x6a/0x80 [<0000000004594c05>] btrfs_mount+0x174/0x910 [btrfs] [<00000000c99b10ea>] legacy_get_tree+0x22/0x40 [<0000000071a6495f>] vfs_get_tree+0x1f/0xc0 [<00000000b86e92c5>] do_mount+0x6b0/0x940 [<0000000097464494>] ksys_mount+0x7b/0xd0 [<0000000057213c80>] __x64_sys_mount+0x1c/0x20 [<00000000cb689b5e>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0x130 [<000000002194e289>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Free fs_info::csum_hash in close_ctree() to avoid the memory leak. Fixes: 6d97c6e31b55 ("btrfs: add boilerplate code for directly including the crypto framework") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-17btrfs: Fix build error while LIBCRC32C is moduleYueHaibing1-0/+1
If CONFIG_BTRFS_FS is y and CONFIG_LIBCRC32C is m, building fails: fs/btrfs/super.o: In function `btrfs_mount_root': super.c:(.text+0xb7f9): undefined reference to `crc32c_impl' fs/btrfs/super.o: In function `init_btrfs_fs': super.c:(.init.text+0x3465): undefined reference to `crc32c_impl' fs/btrfs/extent-tree.o: In function `hash_extent_data_ref': extent-tree.c:(.text+0xe60): undefined reference to `crc32c' extent-tree.c:(.text+0xe78): undefined reference to `crc32c' extent-tree.c:(.text+0xe8b): undefined reference to `crc32c' fs/btrfs/dir-item.o: In function `btrfs_insert_xattr_item': dir-item.c:(.text+0x291): undefined reference to `crc32c' fs/btrfs/dir-item.o: In function `btrfs_insert_dir_item': dir-item.c:(.text+0x429): undefined reference to `crc32c' Select LIBCRC32C to fix it. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Fixes: d5178578bcd4 ("btrfs: directly call into crypto framework for checksumming") Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-17btrfs: inode: Don't compress if NODATASUM or NODATACOW setQu Wenruo1-1/+23
As btrfs(5) specified: Note If nodatacow or nodatasum are enabled, compression is disabled. If NODATASUM or NODATACOW set, we should not compress the extent. Normally NODATACOW is detected properly in run_delalloc_range() so compression won't happen for NODATACOW. However for NODATASUM we don't have any check, and it can cause compressed extent without csum pretty easily, just by: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev $mnt -o nodatasum touch $mnt/foobar mount -o remount,datasum,compress $mnt xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 128K" $mnt/foobar And in fact, we have a bug report about corrupted compressed extent without proper data checksum so even RAID1 can't recover the corruption. (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199707) Running compression without proper checksum could cause more damage when corruption happens, as compressed data could make the whole extent unreadable, so there is no need to allow compression for NODATACSUM. The fix will refactor the inode compression check into two parts: - inode_can_compress() As the hard requirement, checked at btrfs_run_delalloc_range(), so no compression will happen for NODATASUM inode at all. - inode_need_compress() As the soft requirement, checked at btrfs_run_delalloc_range() and compress_file_range(). Reported-by: James Harvey <jamespharvey20@gmail.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-05btrfs: fix memory leak of path on error return pathColin Ian King1-2/+1
Currently if the allocation of roots or tmp_ulist fails the error handling does not free up the allocation of path causing a memory leak. Fix this and other similar leaks by moving the call of btrfs_free_path from label out to label out_free_ulist. Kudos to David Sterba for spotting the issue in my original fix and suggesting the correct way to fix the leak and Anand Jain for spotting a double free issue. Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak") Fixes: 5911c8fe05c5 ("btrfs: fiemap: preallocate ulists for btrfs_check_shared") Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-04btrfs: move the subvolume reservation stuff out of extent-tree.cJosef Bacik2-54/+56
This is just two functions, put it in root-tree.c since it involves root items. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-04btrfs: migrate the delalloc space stuff to it's own homeJosef Bacik12-499/+526
We have code for data and metadata reservations for delalloc. There's quite a bit of code here, and it's used in a lot of places so I've separated it out to it's own file. inode.c and file.c are already pretty large, and this code is complicated enough to live in its own space. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-04btrfs: migrate btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadataJosef Bacik4-19/+19
Move this into transaction.c with the rest of the transaction related code. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-04btrfs: migrate the delayed refs rsv codeJosef Bacik4-183/+184
These belong with the delayed refs related code, not in extent-tree.c. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-04btrfs: Evaluate io_tree in find_lock_delalloc_range()Goldwyn Rodrigues3-19/+19
Simplification. No point passing the tree variable when it can be evaluated from inode. The tests now use the io_tree from btrfs_inode as opposed to creating one. Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: migrate the global_block_rsv helpers to block-rsv.cJosef Bacik3-183/+193
These helpers belong in block-rsv.c Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: migrate the block-rsv code to block-rsv.cJosef Bacik3-247/+255
This moves everything out of extent-tree.c to block-rsv.c. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: stop using block_rsv_release_bytes everywhereJosef Bacik1-8/+6
block_rsv_release_bytes() is the internal to the block_rsv code, and shouldn't be called directly by anything else. Switch all users to the exported helpers. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: cleanup the target logic in __btrfs_block_rsv_releaseJosef Bacik1-3/+9
This works for all callers already, but if we wanted to use the helper for the global_block_rsv it would end up trying to refill itself. Fix the logic to be able to be used no matter which block rsv is passed in to this helper. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: export __btrfs_block_rsv_releaseJosef Bacik2-13/+13
The delalloc reserve stuff calls this directly because it cares about the qgroup accounting stuff, so export it so we can move it around. Fix btrfs_block_rsv_release() to just be a static inline since it just calls __btrfs_block_rsv_release() with NULL for the qgroup stuff. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: export btrfs_block_rsv_add_bytesJosef Bacik2-9/+11
This is used in a few places, we need to make sure it's exported so we can move it around. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move btrfs_block_rsv definitions into it's own headerJosef Bacik3-68/+79
Prep work for separating out all of the block_rsv related code into its own file. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: Simplify update of space_info in __reserve_metadata_bytes()Goldwyn Rodrigues1-11/+5
We don't need an if-else-if chain where we can use a simple OR since both conditions are performing the same action. The short-circuit for OR will ensure that if the first condition is true, can_overcommit() is not called. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: unexport can_overcommitJosef Bacik2-16/+11
Now that we've moved all of the users to space-info.c, unexport it and name it back to can_overcommit. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move reserve_metadata_bytes and supporting code to space-info.cJosef Bacik3-702/+709
This moves all of the metadata reservation code into space-info.c. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move dump_space_info to space-info.cJosef Bacik3-63/+65
We'll need this exported so we can use it in all the various was we need to use it. This is prep work to move reserve_metadata_bytes. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: export block_rsv_use_bytesJosef Bacik2-8/+6
We are going to need this to move the metadata reservation stuff to space_info.c. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move btrfs_space_info_add_*_bytes to space-info.cJosef Bacik3-111/+114
Now that we've moved all the pre-requisite stuff, move these two functions. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move the space info update macro to space-info.hJosef Bacik2-37/+49
Also rename it to btrfs_space_info_update_* so it's clear what we're updating. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move and export can_overcommitJosef Bacik3-75/+79
This is the first piece of moving the space reservation code to space-info.c Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move the space_info handling code to space-info.cJosef Bacik4-187/+204
These are the basic init and lookup functions and some helper functions, fairly straightforward before the bad stuff starts. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: export space_info_add_*_bytesJosef Bacik2-22/+25
Prep work for consolidating all of the space_info code into one file. We need to export these so multiple files can use them. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: rename do_chunk_alloc to btrfs_chunk_allocJosef Bacik2-36/+35
Really we just need the enum, but as we break more things up it'll help to have this external to extent-tree.c. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: move space_info to space-info.hJosef Bacik8-72/+85
Migrate the struct definition and the one helper that's in ctree.h into space-info.h Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: lift bio_set_dev from bio allocation helpersDavid Sterba3-8/+12
The block device is passed around for the only purpose to set it in new bios. Move the assignment one level up. This is a preparatory patch for further bdev cleanups. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: use raid_attr for minimum stripe count in btrfs_calc_avail_data_spaceDavid Sterba1-8/+5
Minimum stripe count matches the minimum devices required for a given profile. The open coded assignments match the raid_attr table. What's changed here is the meaning for RAID5/6. Previously their min_stripes would be 1, while newly it's devs_min. This however shold be the same as before because it's not possible to create filesystem on fewer devices than the raid_attr table allows. There's no adjustment regarding the parity stripes (like calc_data_stripes does), because we're interested in overall space that would fit on the devices. Missing devices make no difference for the whole calculation, we have the size stored in the structures. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: use raid_attr to adjust minimal stripe size in ↵David Sterba1-4/+5
btrfs_calc_avail_data_space Special case for DUP can be replaced by lookup to the attribute table, where the dev_stripes is the right coefficient. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: drop default value assignments in enumsDavid Sterba2-10/+10
A few more instances whre we don't need to specify the values as long as they are the same that enum assigns automatically. All of the enums are in-memory only and nothing relies on the exact values. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: use common helpers for extent IO state insertion messagesDavid Sterba1-4/+7
Print the error messages using the helpers that also print the filesystem identification. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: run delayed iput at unlink timeJosef Bacik1-6/+34
We have been seeing issues in production where a cleaner script will end up unlinking a bunch of files that have pending iputs. This means they will get their final iput's run at btrfs-cleaner time and thus are not throttled, which impacts the workload. Since we are unlinking these files we can just drop the delayed iput at unlink time. We are already holding a reference to the inode so this will not be the final iput and thus is completely safe to do at this point. Doing this means we are more likely to be doing the final iput at unlink time, and thus will get the IO charged to the caller and get throttled appropriately without affecting the main workload. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02Btrfs: add missing inode version, ctime and mtime updates when punching holeFilipe Manana1-0/+5
If the range for which we are punching a hole covers only part of a page, we end up updating the inode item but we skip the update of the inode's iversion, mtime and ctime. Fix that by ensuring we update those properties of the inode. A patch for fstests test case generic/059 that tests this as been sent along with this fix. Fixes: 2aaa66558172b0 ("Btrfs: add hole punching") Fixes: e8c1c76e804b18 ("Btrfs: add missing inode update when punching hole") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02Btrfs: fix fsync not persisting dentry deletions due to inode evictionsFilipe Manana1-2/+26
In order to avoid searches on a log tree when unlinking an inode, we check if the inode being unlinked was logged in the current transaction, as well as the inode of its parent directory. When any of the inodes are logged, we proceed to delete directory items and inode reference items from the log, to ensure that if a subsequent fsync of only the inode being unlinked or only of the parent directory when the other is not fsync'ed as well, does not result in the entry still existing after a power failure. That check however is not reliable when one of the inodes involved (the one being unlinked or its parent directory's inode) is evicted, since the logged_trans field is transient, that is, it is not stored on disk, so it is lost when the inode is evicted and loaded into memory again (which is set to zero on load). As a consequence the checks currently being done by btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log() and btrfs_del_inode_ref_in_log() always return true if the inode was evicted before, regardless of the inode having been logged or not before (and in the current transaction), this results in the dentry being unlinked still existing after a log replay if after the unlink operation only one of the inodes involved is fsync'ed. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/dir $ touch /mnt/dir/foo $ xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/dir/foo # Keep an open file descriptor on our directory while we evict inodes. # We just want to evict the file's inode, the directory's inode must not # be evicted. $ ( cd /mnt/dir; while true; do :; done ) & $ pid=$! # Wait a bit to give time to background process to chdir to our test # directory. $ sleep 0.5 # Trigger eviction of the file's inode. $ echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches # Unlink our file and fsync the parent directory. After a power failure # we don't expect to see the file anymore, since we fsync'ed the parent # directory. $ rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/dir/foo $ xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/dir <power failure> $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ ls /mnt/dir foo $ --> file still there, unlink not persisted despite explicit fsync on dir Fix this by checking if the inode has the full_sync bit set in its runtime flags as well, since that bit is set everytime an inode is loaded from disk, or for other less common cases such as after a shrinking truncate or failure to allocate extent maps for holes, and gets cleared after the first fsync. Also consider the inode as possibly logged only if it was last modified in the current transaction (besides having the full_fsync flag set). Fixes: 3a5f1d458ad161 ("Btrfs: Optimize btree walking while logging inodes") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: Use btrfs_get_io_geometry appropriatelyNikolay Borisov3-78/+30
Presently btrfs_map_block is used not only to do everything necessary to map a bio to the underlying allocation profile but it's also used to identify how much data could be written based on btrfs' stripe logic without actually submitting anything. This is achieved by passing NULL for 'bbio_ret' parameter. This patch refactors all callers that require just the mapping length by switching them to using btrfs_io_geometry instead of calling btrfs_map_block with a special NULL value for 'bbio_ret'. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: Introduce btrfs_io_geometry infrastructureNikolay Borisov2-0/+113
Add a structure that holds various parameters for IO calculations and a helper that fills the values. This will help further refactoring and reduction of functions that in some way open-coded the calculations. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: improve messages when updating feature flagsDavid Sterba1-16/+24
Currently the messages printed after setting an incompat feature are cryptis, we can easily make it better as the textual description is passed to the helpers. Old: setting 128 feature flag updated: setting incompat feature flag for RAID56 (0x80) Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: shut up bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warningArnd Bergmann1-1/+1
gcc sometimes can't determine whether a variable has been initialized when both the initialization and the use are conditional: fs/btrfs/props.c: In function 'inherit_props': fs/btrfs/props.c:389:4: error: 'num_bytes' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, This code is fine. Unfortunately, I cannot think of a good way to rephrase it in a way that makes gcc understand this, so I add a bogus initialization the way one should not. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ gcc 8 and 9 don't emit the warning ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocationFilipe Manana4-0/+31
Send always operates on read-only trees and always expected that while it is in progress, nothing changes in those trees. Due to that expectation and the fact that send is a read-only operation, it operates on commit roots and does not hold transaction handles. However relocation can COW nodes and leafs from read-only trees, which can cause unexpected failures and crashes (hitting BUG_ONs). while send using a node/leaf, it gets COWed, the transaction used to COW it is committed, a new transaction starts, the extent previously used for that node/leaf gets allocated, possibly for another tree, and the respective extent buffer' content changes while send is still using it. When this happens send normally fails with EIO being returned to user space and messages like the following are found in dmesg/syslog: [ 3408.699121] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 58703872 wanted 250 found 253 [ 3441.523123] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63211, offset=0, disk_byte=5222825984 found extent=5222825984 Other times, less often, we hit a BUG_ON() because an extent buffer that send is using used to be a node, and while send is still using it, it got COWed and got reused as a leaf while send is still using, producing the following trace: [ 3478.466280] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3478.466282] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [ 3478.466965] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 3478.467635] CPU: 0 PID: 2165 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-btrfs-next-46 #1 [ 3478.468311] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 3478.469681] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [ 3478.471758] RSP: 0018:ffffa437826bfaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 3478.472457] RAX: ffff961416ed7000 RBX: 000000000000003d RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3478.473151] RDX: 000000000000003d RSI: ffff96141e387408 RDI: ffff961599b30000 [ 3478.473837] RBP: ffffa437826bfb8e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffa437826bfb8e [ 3478.474515] R10: ffffa437826bfa70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614385c8708 [ 3478.475186] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.475840] FS: 00007f8e0e9cc8c0(0000) GS:ffff9615b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3478.476489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3478.477127] CR2: 00007f98b67a056e CR3: 0000000005df6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [ 3478.477762] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.478385] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3478.479003] Call Trace: [ 3478.479600] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 3478.480202] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [ 3478.480810] btrfs_compare_trees+0x30c/0x690 [btrfs] [ 3478.481388] ? process_extent+0x1280/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 3478.481954] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [ 3478.482510] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3478.483062] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [ 3478.483581] ? rq_clock_task+0x2e/0x60 [ 3478.484086] ? wake_up_new_task+0x1f3/0x370 [ 3478.484582] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.485075] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [ 3478.485552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.486016] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [ 3478.486467] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 3478.486911] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 3478.487337] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [ 3478.487751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 3478.488159] RIP: 0033:0x7f8e0d7d4dd7 (...) [ 3478.489349] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf6fb4908 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 3478.489742] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f8e0d7d4dd7 [ 3478.490142] RDX: 00007ffcf6fb4990 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.490548] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 00007f8e0d6f3700 R09: 00007f8e0d6f3700 [ 3478.490953] R10: 00007f8e0d6f39d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.491343] R13: 00005624e0780020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [ 3478.493352] ---[ end trace d5f537302be4f8c8 ]--- Another possibility, much less likely to happen, is that send will not fail but the contents of the stream it produces may not be correct. To avoid this, do not allow send and relocation (balance) to run in parallel. In the long term the goal is to allow for both to be able to run concurrently without any problems, but that will take a significant effort in development and testing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: document BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORSDavid Sterba1-1/+10
The real meaning of that constant is not clear from the context due to the target device inclusion. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: use mask for RAID56 profilesDavid Sterba1-6/+3
We don't need to enumerate the profiles, use the mask for consistency. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: add mask for all RAID1 typesDavid Sterba3-9/+9
Preparatory patch for additional RAID1 profiles with more copies. The mask will contain 3-copy and 4-copy, most of the checks for plain RAID1 work the same for the other profiles. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02btrfs: qgroup: Don't hold qgroup_ioctl_lock in btrfs_qgroup_inherit()Qu Wenruo1-2/+22
[BUG] Lockdep will report the following circular locking dependency: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.2.0-rc2-custom #24 Tainted: G O ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/8631 is trying to acquire lock: 000000002536438c (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2){+.+.}, at: btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x40/0x620 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: 000000003d52cc23 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}, at: create_pending_snapshot+0x8b6/0xe60 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x76/0x940 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x475/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_super+0x71/0x80 [btrfs] close_ctree+0x2bd/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110 kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x16/0xa0 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x80 deactivate_super+0x51/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x80 __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 task_work_run+0x94/0xb0 exit_to_usermode_loop+0xd8/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x210/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #1 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x76/0x940 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x40d/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x2da/0x730 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2691/0x2b40 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x6d0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x65/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xa7/0x190 __mutex_lock+0x76/0x940 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x40/0x620 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshot+0x9d7/0xe60 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x94/0xb0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x415/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x496/0x4e0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x174/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11c/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xa90/0x2b40 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x6d0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x65/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2 --> &fs_info->reloc_mutex --> &fs_info->tree_log_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex); lock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex); lock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex); lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by btrfs/8631: #0: 00000000ed8f23f6 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0x60 #1: 000000009fb1597a (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10/1){+.+.}, at: btrfs_mksubvol+0x70/0x4e0 [btrfs] #2: 0000000088c5ad88 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}, at: btrfs_mksubvol+0x128/0x4e0 [btrfs] #3: 000000009606fc3e (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x37a/0x520 [btrfs] #4: 00000000f82bbdf5 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_commit_transaction+0x40d/0xa00 [btrfs] #5: 000000003d52cc23 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}, at: create_pending_snapshot+0x8b6/0xe60 [btrfs] [CAUSE] Due to the delayed subvolume creation, we need to call btrfs_qgroup_inherit() inside commit transaction code, with a lot of other mutex hold. This hell of lock chain can lead to above problem. [FIX] On the other hand, we don't really need to hold qgroup_ioctl_lock if we're in the context of create_pending_snapshot(). As in that context, we're the only one being able to modify qgroup. All other qgroup functions which needs qgroup_ioctl_lock are either holding a transaction handle, or will start a new transaction: Functions will start a new transaction(): * btrfs_quota_enable() * btrfs_quota_disable() Functions hold a transaction handler: * btrfs_add_qgroup_relation() * btrfs_del_qgroup_relation() * btrfs_create_qgroup() * btrfs_remove_qgroup() * btrfs_limit_qgroup() * btrfs_qgroup_inherit() call inside create_subvol() So we have a higher level protection provided by transaction, thus we don't need to always hold qgroup_ioctl_lock in btrfs_qgroup_inherit(). Only the btrfs_qgroup_inherit() call in create_subvol() needs to hold qgroup_ioctl_lock, while the btrfs_qgroup_inherit() call in create_pending_snapshot() is already protected by transaction. So the fix is to detect the context by checking trans->transaction->state. If we're at TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING, then we're in commit transaction context and no need to get the mutex. Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>