| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
...to make sure that we don't use it for double hashed lookups
instead of dent_key_init_hash().
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: David Gstir <david@sigma-star.at>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
|
As of now all filenames known by UBIFS are strings with a NUL
terminator. With encrypted filenames a filename can be any binary
string and the r5 function cannot search for the NUL terminator.
UBIFS always knows how long a filename is, therefore we can change
the hash function to iterate over the filename length to work
correctly with binary strings.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
|
Add a comment in key.h to explain why we keep an unused
parameter in key helpers.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
|
When scanning the flash, UBIFS builds a list of flash nodes of type
'struct ubifs_scan_node'. Each scanned node has a 'snod->key' field. This field
is valid for most of the nodes, but invalid for some node type, e.g., truncation
nodes. It is safer to explicitly initialize such keys to something invalid,
rather than leaving them initialized to all zeros, which has key type of
UBIFS_INO_KEY.
This patch introduces new "fake" key type UBIFS_INVALID_KEY and initializes
unused 'snod->key' objects to this type. It also adds debugging assertions in
the TNC code to make sure no one ever tries to look these nodes up in the TNC.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
|
|
Add one more check to UBIFS - a check that makes sure that there
are no data nodes beyond inode size. And few commantaries fixes
along the line.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
|
|
Remove 'xent_key_init_hash()' and 'data_key_init_flash()' functions,
as they are unot used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
|
|
... which should be uint32_t, not int.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
|
|
I have a habit of compiling kernel with
EXTRA_CFLAGS="-Wextra -Wno-unused -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-missing-field-initializers"
and so fs/ubifs/key.h give lots (~10) of these every time:
CC fs/ubifs/tnc_misc.o
In file included from fs/ubifs/ubifs.h:1725,
from fs/ubifs/tnc_misc.c:30:
fs/ubifs/key.h: In function 'key_r5_hash':
fs/ubifs/key.h:64: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true
fs/ubifs/key.h: In function 'key_test_hash':
fs/ubifs/key.h:81: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true
This patch fixes the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
|
|
Noticed by sparse:
fs/ubifs/file.c:75:2: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
fs/ubifs/file.c:629:4: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
fs/ubifs/dir.c:431:3: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
This should be checked to ensure the ubifs_assert is working as
intended, I've done the suggested annotation in this patch.
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: expected int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident>
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] atime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] ctime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] mtime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
This looks like a bugfix as your tmp was a u32 so there was truncation in
the atime, mtime, ctime value, probably not intentional, add a tmp_le64
and use it here.
fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/key.h:419:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
Read from the annotated union member instead.
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: got restricted __le32 [usertype] flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: expected restricted __le32 [usertype] flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags
Do byteshifting at compile time of the flag value. Annotate the saved_flags
as le32.
fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast from restricted __le64
Should be checked if the truncation was intentional, I've changed the
printk to print the full width.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
|
|
Some flash media are capable of reading sequentially at faster rates.
UBIFS bulk-read facility is designed to take advantage of that, by
reading in one go consecutive data nodes that are also located
consecutively in the same LEB.
Read speed on Arm platform with OneNAND goes from 17 MiB/s to
19 MiB/s.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
|
|
This is a new flash file system. See
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
|
