summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ext3/acl.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-09-08ext[234]: move over to 'check_acl' permission modelLinus Torvalds1-2/+2
Don't implement per-filesystem 'extX_permission()' functions that have to be called for every path component operation, and instead just expose the actual ACL checking so that the VFS layer can now do it for us. Reviewed-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-06-24switch ext3 to inode->i_aclAl Viro1-4/+0
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2008-07-27[PATCH] sanitize ->permission() prototypeAl Viro1-1/+1
* kill nameidata * argument; map the 3 bits in ->flags anybody cares about to new MAY_... ones and pass with the mask. * kill redundant gfs2_iop_permission() * sanitize ecryptfs_permission() * fix remaining places where ->permission() instances might barf on new MAY_... found in mask. The obvious next target in that direction is permission(9) folded fix for nfs_permission() breakage from Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2006-07-11[PATCH] Remove leftover ext3 acl declarationsAndreas Gruenbacher1-3/+0
These functions no longer exist; remove their declarations. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23[PATCH] remove <linux/xattr_acl.h>Christoph Hellwig1-1/+1
This file duplicates <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>, using slightly different names. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-17Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds1-0/+84
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!