summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-02-24Btrfs: fix compiler warnings on 32 bit systemsChris Mason1-1/+2
The enospc tracing code added some interesting uses of u64 pointer casts. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-02-23Btrfs: improve error handling for btrfs_insert_dir_item callersChris Mason1-6/+7
This allows us to gracefully continue if we aren't able to insert directory items, both for normal files/dirs and snapshots. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-17Btrfs: space leak tracepointsJosef Bacik1-0/+2
This in addition to a script in my btrfs-tracing tree will help track down space leaks when we're getting space left over in block groups on umount. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2012-01-17Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.jan-o-sch.net/btrfs-unstable into ↵Chris Mason1-2/+7
integration
2012-01-07Btrfs: run chunk allocations while we do delayed refsChris Mason1-8/+1
Btrfs tries to batch extent allocation tree changes to improve performance and reduce metadata trashing. But it doesn't allocate new metadata chunks while it is doing allocations for the extent allocation tree. This commit changes the delayed refence code to do chunk allocations if we're getting low on room. It prevents crashes and improves performance. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-04Btrfs: add waitqueue instead of doing busy waiting for more delayed refsJan Schmidt1-0/+1
Now that we may be holding back delayed refs for a limited period, we might end up having no runnable delayed refs. Without this commit, we'd do busy waiting in that thread until another (runnable) ref arives. Instead, we're detecting this situation and use a waitqueue, such that we only try to run more refs after a) another runnable ref was added or b) delayed refs are no longer held back Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-01-04Btrfs: add sequence numbers to delayed refsArne Jansen1-0/+4
Sequence numbers are needed to reconstruct the backrefs of a given extent to a certain point in time. The total set of backrefs consist of the set of backrefs recorded on disk plus the enqueued delayed refs for it that existed at that moment. This patch also adds a list that records all delayed refs which are currently in the process of being added. When walking all refs of an extent in btrfs_find_all_roots(), we freeze the current state of delayed refs, honor anythinh up to this point and prevent processing newer delayed refs to assert consistency. Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2011-12-22Btrfs: mark delayed refs as for cowArne Jansen1-2/+2
Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups. Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they don't change subvol quota. Also pass in the fs_info for later use. btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to those delayed refs. Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2011-11-15Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flushLiu Bo1-0/+8
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit. But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions: 1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction, and this may change the src root when processing the following pending snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions; 2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache, which lead to corruptions. This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be consistent. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-11Btrfs: fix deadlock caused by the race between relocationMiao Xie1-2/+2
We can not do flushable reservation for the relocation when we create snapshot, because it may make the transaction commit task and the flush task wait for each other and the deadlock happens. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06Btrfs: fix race during transaction joinsChris Mason1-5/+8
While we're allocating ram for a new transaction, we drop our spinlock. When we get the lock back, we do check to see if a transaction started while we slept, but we don't check to make sure it isn't blocked because a commit has already started. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06Btrfs: ClearPageError during writepage and clean_tree_blockChris Mason1-1/+6
Failure testing was tripping up over stale PageError bits in metadata pages. If we have an io error on a block, and later on end up reusing it, nobody ever clears PageError on those pages. During commit, we'll find PageError and think we had trouble writing the block, which will lead to aborts and other problems. This changes clean_tree_block and the btrfs writepage code to clear the PageError bit. In both cases we're either completely done with the page or the page has good stuff and the error bit is no longer valid. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06btrfs: separate superblock items out of fs_infoDavid Sterba1-5/+5
fs_info has now ~9kb, more than fits into one page. This will cause mount failure when memory is too fragmented. Top space consumers are super block structures super_copy and super_for_commit, ~2.8kb each. Allocate them dynamically. fs_info will be ~3.5kb. (measured on x86_64) Add a wrapper for freeing fs_info and all of it's dynamically allocated members. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-10-19Btrfs: seperate out btrfs_block_rsv_check out into 2 different functionsJosef Bacik1-2/+2
Currently btrfs_block_rsv_check does 2 things, it will either refill a block reserve like in the truncate or refill case, or it will check to see if there is enough space in the global reserve and possibly refill it. However because of overcommit we could be well overcommitting ourselves just to try and refill the global reserve, when really we should just be committing the transaction. So breack this out into btrfs_block_rsv_refill and btrfs_block_rsv_check. Refill will try to reserve more metadata if it can and btrfs_block_rsv_check will not, it will only tell you if the factor of the total space is still reserved. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: release trans metadata bytes before flushing delayed refsJosef Bacik1-4/+2
We started setting trans->block_rsv = NULL to allow the delayed refs flushing stuff to use the right block_rsv and then just made btrfs_trans_release_metadata() unconditionally use the trans block rsv. The problem with this is we need to reserve some space in the transaction and then migrate it to the global block rsv, so we need to be able to free that out properly. So instead just move btrfs_trans_release_metadata() before the delayed ref flushing and use trans->block_rsv for the freeing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: introduce mount option no_space_cacheJosef Bacik1-1/+1
Some users have requested this and I've found I needed a way to disable cache loading without actually clearing the cache, so introduce the no_space_cache option. Before we check the super blocks cache generation field and if it was populated we always turned space caching on. Now we check this and set the space cache option on, and then parse the mount options so that if we want it off it get's turned off. Then we check the mount option all the places we do the caching work instead of checking the super's cache generation. This makes things more consistent and lets us turn space caching off. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: stop using write_one_pageJosef Bacik1-67/+19
While looking for a performance regression a user was complaining about, I noticed that we had a regression with the varmail test of filebench. This was introduced by 0d10ee2e6deb5c8409ae65b970846344897d5e4e which keeps us from calling writepages in writepage. This is a correct change, however it happens to help the varmail test because we write out in larger chunks. This is largly to do with how we write out dirty pages for each transaction. If you run filebench with load varmail set $dir=/mnt/btrfs-test run 60 prior to this patch you would get ~1420 ops/second, but with the patch you get ~1200 ops/second. This is a 16% decrease. So since we know the range of dirty pages we want to write out, don't write out in one page chunks, write out in ranges. So to do this we call filemap_fdatawrite_range() on the range of bytes. Then we convert the DIRTY extents to NEED_WAIT extents. When we then call btrfs_wait_marked_extents() we only have to filemap_fdatawait_range() on that range and clear the NEED_WAIT extents. This doesn't get us back to our original speeds, but I've been seeing ~1380 ops/second, which is a <5% regression as opposed to a >15% regression. That is acceptable given that the original commit greatly reduces our latency to begin with. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: make sure to unset trans->block_rsv before running delayed refsJosef Bacik1-0/+11
Checksums are charged in 2 different ways. The first case is when we're writing to the disk, we account for the new checksums with the delalloc block rsv. In order for this to work we check if we're allocating a block for the csum root and if trans->block_rsv == the delalloc block rsv. But when we're deleting the csums because of cow, this is charged to the global block rsv, and is done when we run the delayed refs. So we need to make sure that trans->block_rsv == NULL when running the delayed refs. So set it to NULL and reset it in should_end_transaction, and set it to NULL in commit_transaction. This got rid of the ridiculous amount of warnings I was seeing when trying to do a balance. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: stop passing a trans handle all around the reservation codeJosef Bacik1-4/+4
The only thing that we need to have a trans handle for is in reserve_metadata_bytes and thats to know how much flushing we can do. So instead of passing it around, just check current->journal_info for a trans_handle so we know if we can commit a transaction to try and free up space or not. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: use the transactions block_rsv for the csum rootJosef Bacik1-0/+1
The alloc warnings everybody has been seeing is because we have been reserving space for csums, but we weren't actually using that space. So make get_block_rsv() return the trans->block_rsv if we're modifying the csum root. Also set the trans->block_rsv to NULL so that if we modify the csum root when running delayed ref's that comes out of the global reserve like it's supposed to. With this patch I'm not seeing those alloc warnings anymore. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: allow callers to specify if flushing can occur for btrfs_block_rsv_checkJosef Bacik1-1/+1
If you run xfstest 224 it you will get lots of messages about not being able to delete inodes and that they will be cleaned up next mount. This is because btrfs_block_rsv_check was not calling reserve_metadata_bytes with the ability to flush, so if there was not enough space, it simply failed. But in truncate and evict case we could easily flush space to try and get enough space to do our work, so make btrfs_block_rsv_check take a flush argument to pass down to reserve_metadata_bytes. Now xfstests 224 runs fine without all those complaints. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19Btrfs: kill the orphan space calculation for snapshotsJosef Bacik1-2/+0
This patch kills off the calculation for the amount of space needed for the orphan operations during a snapshot. The thing is we only do snapshots on commit, so any space that is in the block_rsv->freed[] isn't going to be in the new snapshot anyway, so there isn't any reason to require that space to be reserved for the snapshot to occur. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-09-11Btrfs: fix misuse of trans block rsvLiu Bo1-0/+4
At the beginning of create_pending_snapshot, trans->block_rsv is set to pending->block_rsv and is used for snapshot things, however, when it is done, we do not recover it as will. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01Btrfs: remove a BUG_ON() in btrfs_commit_transaction()Li Zefan1-4/+2
wait_for_commit() always returns 0. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01Btrfs: use wait_event()Li Zefan1-52/+7
Use wait_event() when possible to avoid code duplication. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27Btrfs: fix deadlock when throttling transactionsJosef Bacik1-2/+9
Hit this nice little deadlock. What happens is this __btrfs_end_transaction with throttle set, --use_count so it equals 0 btrfs_commit_transaction <somebody else actually manages to start the commit> btrfs_end_transaction --use_count so now its -1 <== BAD we just return and wait on the transaction This is bad because we just return after our use_count is -1 and don't let go of our num_writer count on the transaction, so the guy committing the transaction just sits there forever. Fix this by inc'ing our use_count if we're going to call commit_transaction so that if we call btrfs_end_transaction it's valid. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-11Btrfs: do transaction space reservation before joining the transactionJosef Bacik1-19/+17
We have to do weird things when handling enospc in the transaction joining code. Because we've already joined the transaction we cannot commit the transaction within the reservation code since it will deadlock, so we have to return EAGAIN and then make sure we don't retry too many times. Instead of doing this, just do the reservation the normal way before we join the transaction, that way we can do whatever we want to try and reclaim space, and then if it fails we know for sure we are out of space and we can return ENOSPC. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-06-18Btrfs: avoid delayed metadata items during commitsChris Mason1-10/+17
Snapshot creation has two phases. One is the initial snapshot setup, and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify the root we are snapshotting. The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot, and delayed directory item insertion. This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-17Merge branch 'for-chris' of ↵Chris Mason1-3/+11
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work into for-linus Conflicts: fs/btrfs/transaction.c Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-17Btrfs: fix relocation racesChris Mason1-4/+69
The recent commit to get rid of our trans_mutex introduced some races with block group relocation. The problem is that relocation needs to do some record keeping about each root, and it was relying on the transaction mutex to coordinate things in subtle ways. This fix adds a mutex just for the relocation code and makes sure it doesn't have a big impact on normal operations. The race is really fixed in btrfs_record_root_in_trans, which is where we step back and wait for the relocation code to finish accounting setup. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15Btrfs: set no_trans_join after trying to expand the transactionJosef Bacik1-3/+11
We can lockup if we try to allow new writers join the transaction and we have flushoncommit set or have a pending snapshot. This is because we set no_trans_join and then loop around and try to wait for ordered extents again. The problem is the ordered endio stuff needs to join the transaction, which it can't do because no_trans_join is set. So instead wait until after this loop to set no_trans_join and then make sure to wait for num_writers == 1 in case anybody got started in between us exiting the loop and setting no_trans_join. This could easily be reproduced by mounting -o flushoncommit and running xfstest 13. It cannot be reproduced with this patch. Thanks, Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-06-11Btrfs: clear current->journal_info on async transaction commitSage Weil1-1/+4
Normally current->jouranl_info is cleared by commit_transaction. For an async snap or subvol creation, though, it runs in a work queue. Clear it in btrfs_commit_transaction_async() to avoid leaking a non-NULL journal_info when we return to userspace. When the actual commit runs in the other thread it won't care that it's current->journal_info is already NULL. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-09Btrfs: unlock the trans lock properlyJosef Bacik1-1/+1
In btrfs_wait_for_commit if we came upon a transaction that had committed we just exited, but that's bad since we are holding the trans_lock. So break instead so that the lock is dropped. Thanks, Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-06-04btrfs: add helper for fs_info->closingDavid Sterba1-1/+1
wrap checking of filesystem 'closing' flag and fix a few missing memory barriers. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-05-28Merge branch 'for-chris' ofChris Mason1-137/+163
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work into for-linus Conflicts: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c fs/btrfs/inode.c fs/btrfs/transaction.c Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-23Btrfs: kill BTRFS_I(inode)->block_groupJosef Bacik1-1/+0
Originally this was going to be used as a way to give hints to the allocator, but frankly we can get much better hints elsewhere and it's not even used at all for anything usefull. In addition to be completely useless, when we initialize an inode we try and find a freeish block group to set as the inodes block group, and with a completely full 40gb fs this takes _forever_, so I imagine with say 1tb fs this is just unbearable. So just axe the thing altoghether, we don't need it and it saves us 8 bytes in the inode and saves us 500 microseconds per inode lookup in my testcase. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23Btrfs: kill trans_mutexJosef Bacik1-129/+142
We use trans_mutex for lots of things, here's a basic list 1) To serialize trans_handles joining the currently running transaction 2) To make sure that no new trans handles are started while we are committing 3) To protect the dead_roots list and the transaction lists Really the serializing trans_handles joining is not too hard, and can really get bogged down in acquiring a reference to the transaction. So replace the trans_mutex with a trans_lock spinlock and use it to do the following 1) Protect fs_info->running_transaction. All trans handles have to do is check this, and then take a reference of the transaction and keep on going. 2) Protect the fs_info->trans_list. This doesn't get used too much, basically it just holds the current transactions, which will usually just be the currently committing transaction and the currently running transaction at most. 3) Protect the dead roots list. This is only ever processed by splicing the list so this is relatively simple. 4) Protect the fs_info->reloc_ctl stuff. This is very lightweight and was using the trans_mutex before, so this is a pretty straightforward change. 5) Protect fs_info->no_trans_join. Because we don't hold the trans_lock over the entirety of the commit we need to have a way to block new people from creating a new transaction while we're doing our work. So we set no_trans_join and in join_transaction we test to see if that is set, and if it is we do a wait_on_commit. 6) Make the transaction use count atomic so we don't need to take locks to modify it when we're dropping references. 7) Add a commit_lock to the transaction to make sure multiple people trying to commit the same transaction don't race and commit at the same time. 8) Make open_ioctl_trans an atomic so we don't have to take any locks for ioctl trans. I have tested this with xfstests, but obviously it is a pretty hairy change so lots of testing is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23Btrfs: if we've already started a trans handle, use that oneJosef Bacik1-0/+17
We currently track trans handles in current->journal_info, but we don't actually use it. This patch fixes it. This will cover the case where we have multiple people starting transactions down the call chain. This keeps us from having to allocate a new handle and all of that, we just increase the use count of the current handle, save the old block_rsv, and return. I tested this with xfstests and it worked out fine. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23Btrfs: take away the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transactionJosef Bacik1-8/+5
I keep forgetting that btrfs_join_transaction() just ignores the num_items argument, which leads me to sending pointless patches and looking stupid :). So just kill the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction and btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction, since neither of them use it. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-05-23Merge branch 'for-chris' of ↵Chris Mason1-0/+3
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arne/btrfs-unstable-arne into inode_numbers Conflicts: fs/btrfs/Makefile fs/btrfs/ctree.h fs/btrfs/volumes.h Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-22Merge branch 'cleanups' of git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/btrfs-unstable into ↵Chris Mason1-136/+1
inode_numbers Conflicts: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c fs/btrfs/inode.c fs/btrfs/tree-log.c Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-22Merge branch 'delayed_inode' into inode_numbersChris Mason1-4/+41
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/inode.c fs/btrfs/ioctl.c fs/btrfs/transaction.c Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-21btrfs: implement delayed inode items operationMiao Xie1-4/+41
Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-05-12btrfs: scrubArne Jansen1-0/+3
This adds an initial implementation for scrub. It works quite straightforward. The usermode issues an ioctl for each device in the fs. For each device, it enumerates the allocated device chunks. For each chunk, the contained extents are enumerated and the data checksums fetched. The extents are read sequentially and the checksums verified. If an error occurs (checksum or EIO), a good copy is searched for. If one is found, the bad copy will be rewritten. All enumerations happen from the commit roots. During a transaction commit, the scrubs get paused and afterwards continue from the new roots. This commit is based on the series originally posted to linux-btrfs with some improvements that resulted from comments from David Sterba, Ilya Dryomov and Jan Schmidt. Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
2011-05-06btrfs: remove old unused commented out codeDavid Sterba1-134/+0
Remove code which has been #if0-ed out for a very long time and does not seem to be related to current codebase anymore. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-05-02btrfs: drop unused argument from extent_io_tree_initDavid Sterba1-2/+1
all callers pass GFP_NOFS, but the GFP mask argument is not used in the function; GFP_ATOMIC is passed to radix tree initialization and it's the only correct one, since we're using the preload/insert mechanism of radix tree. Let's drop the gfp mask from btrfs function, this will not change behaviour. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-04-25Btrfs: Support reading/writing on disk free ino cacheLi Zefan1-0/+2
This is similar to block group caching. We dedicate a special inode in fs tree to save free ino cache. At the very first time we create/delete a file after mount, the free ino cache will be loaded from disk into memory. When the fs tree is commited, the cache will be written back to disk. To keep compatibility, we check the root generation against the generation of the special inode when loading the cache, so the loading will fail if the btrfs filesystem was mounted in an older kernel before. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-04-25Btrfs: Always use 64bit inode numberLi Zefan1-2/+2
There's a potential problem in 32bit system when we exhaust 32bit inode numbers and start to allocate big inode numbers, because btrfs uses inode->i_ino in many places. So here we always use BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid, which is an u64 variable. There are 2 exceptions that BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid != inode->i_ino: the btree inode (0 vs 1) and empty subvol dirs (256 vs 2), and inode->i_ino will be used in those cases. Another reason to make this change is I'm going to use a special inode to save free ino cache, and the inode number must be > (u64)-256. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-04-25Btrfs: Cache free inode numbers in memoryLi Zefan1-1/+6
Currently btrfs stores the highest objectid of the fs tree, and it always returns (highest+1) inode number when we create a file, so inode numbers won't be reclaimed when we delete files, so we'll run out of inode numbers as we keep create/delete files in 32bits machines. This fixes it, and it works similarly to how we cache free space in block cgroups. We start a kernel thread to read the file tree. By scanning inode items, we know which chunks of inode numbers are free, and we cache them in an rb-tree. Because we are searching the commit root, we have to carefully handle the cross-transaction case. The rb-tree is a hybrid extent+bitmap tree, so if we have too many small chunks of inode numbers, we'll use bitmaps. Initially we allow 16K ram of extents, and a bitmap will be used if we exceed this threshold. The extents threshold is adjusted in runtime. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-04-12Btrfs: avoid taking the trans_mutex in btrfs_end_transactionJosef Bacik1-21/+16
I've been working on making our O_DIRECT latency not suck and I noticed we were taking the trans_mutex in btrfs_end_transaction. So to do this we convert num_writers and use_count to atomic_t's and just decrement them in btrfs_end_transaction. Instead of deleting the transaction from the trans list in put_transaction we do that in btrfs_commit_transaction() since that's the only time it actually needs to be removed from the list. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>