summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/soc/sunxi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-08-18drivers: soc: sunxi: add support for A64 and its SRAM CIcenowy Zheng1-0/+11
Allwinner A64's display engine claims the SRAM C section to work. Add support for the A64 SRAM controller and the SRAM C section of it. Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
2017-08-18drivers: soc: sunxi: add support for remapping func value to reg valueIcenowy Zheng1-9/+34
On some Allwinner SoCs, sometimes the value needed to write into the register to claim SRAM is not equal to the value specified in the device tree. The device tree binding defines 0 as "mapped to CPU" and 1 as "mapped to X device". This matches the value written to the configuration register for the SRAM blocks currently supported. However, the not yet supported VE SRAM block is claimed for the device by writing 0x7fffffff, which is vastly different from the other blocks. On the A64, SRAM C is claimed by the device by writing a 0, which is the opposite of the current design. Add a value remapping in sunxi_sram_func structure, and let the sunxi_sram_of_parse function set the remapped register value. This allows us to keep the convention currently used in the device tree binding. Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> [wens@csie.org: Clarified commit message] Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
2017-08-18drivers: soc: sunxi: fix error processing on base address when claimingIcenowy Zheng1-0/+3
When claiming SRAM, if the base is set to an error, it means that the SRAM controller has been probed, but failed to remap the controller memory zone. If the base is zero, thus the SRAM controller should be not probed at all, and it should return -EPROBE_DEFER. However, currently we returned -EPROBE_DEFER in the former situation, and ignored the latter situation (which will lead to the kernel to panic). Fix the behavior on abnormal base address processing when claiming. Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> Fixes: 4af34b572a85 ("drivers: soc: sunxi: Introduce SoC driver to map SRAMs") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
2016-01-27drivers: soc: sunxi: Fix mask generation for SRAM mappingJens Kuske1-2/+3
GENMASK is inclusive on both ends, therefor one has to be subtracted from the width. Also fixes the mask for debug output. Signed-off-by: Jens Kuske <jenskuske@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
2015-06-01drivers: soc: sunxi: Introduce SoC driver to map SRAMsMaxime Ripard3-0/+295
The Allwinner SoCs have a handful of SRAM that can be either mapped to be accessible by devices or the CPU. That mapping is controlled by an SRAM controller, and that mapping might not be set by the bootloader, for example if the device wasn't used at all, or if we're using solutions like the U-Boot's Falcon Boot. We could also imagine changing this at runtime for example to change the mapping of these SRAMs to use them for suspend/resume or runtime memory rate change, if that ever happens. These use cases require some API in the kernel to control that mapping, exported through a drivers/soc driver. This driver also implement a debugfs file that shows the SRAM found in the system, the current mapping and the SRAM that have been claimed by some drivers in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>