Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
There might be designs where the power supply circuit is designed
in a way that VDETOFF and SWOFF is required to be set. Otherwise the
RTC detects a power loss. Add a device tree interface for this.
Signed-off-by: Carsten Resch <Carsten.Resch@de.bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel@de.bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
V1F indicates that the time accuracy may have been compromised because
of a voltage drop (possibly only temporary) below VLOW1, which stops the
temperature compensation. When the time is set, the accuracy is
restored, so V1F should be cleared in order to indicate this and to be
able to detect the next temperature compensation loss. This is the same
principle as for V2F, which is cleared when the time is set to indicate
that the time is no longer invalid and to be able to detect the next
data loss.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit@wsystem.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
According to the application manual of the RX8900, the RESET bit must be
set to 1 to prevent a timer update while setting the time. This also
resets the subsecond counter. The application manual of the RV-8803 does
not mention such a requirement, and it says that the 100th Seconds
register is cleared when writing to the Seconds register, but using the
RESET bit for the RV-8803 too should not be an issue and is probably
safer.
This change also ensures that the RESET bit is initialized properly in
all cases. Indeed, all the registers must be initialized if the voltage
has been lower than VLOW2 (triggering V2F), but not low enough to
trigger a POR.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit@wsystem.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
The I²C NACK issue of the RV-8803 may occur after any I²C START
condition, depending on the timings. Consequently, the workaround must
be applied for all the I²C transfers.
This commit abstracts the I²C transfer code into register access
functions. This avoids duplicating the I²C workaround everywhere. This
also avoids the duplication of the code handling the return value of
i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(). Error messages are issued in case of
definitive register access failures (if the workaround fails). This
change also makes the I²C transfer return value checks consistent.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit@wsystem.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
The Weekday register is encoded as 2^tm_wday, with tm_wday in 0..6, so
using tm_wday = ffs(reg) to fill tm_wday from the register value is
wrong because this gives the expected value + 1. This could be fixed as
tm_wday = ffs(reg) - 1, but tm_wday = ilog2(reg) works as well and is
more direct.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit@wsystem.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
The RTC core always calls rtc_valid_tm() after ->read_time() in case of
success (in __rtc_read_time()), so do not call it twice.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit@wsystem.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
Since commit d68778b80dd7 ("rtc: initialize output parameter for read
alarm to "uninitialized"") there is no need to explicitly set
unsupported members to -1. So drop the respective assignments from
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
The previous workaround may still fail as there are actually 4 retries to
be done to ensure the communication succeed. Also, some I2C adapter drivers
may return -EIO instead of -ENXIO.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
The rv8803 has a 60µs window where it will not answer on the i2c bus.
It also means there will be no ack for the communication. Make sure
communication is tried multiple times when this happens (the i2c subsystem
mandates -ENXIO is that case but the number of retries is host specific).
The critical parts are the probe function and the alarm callback so make
sure we handle the failure there.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
Fix a scheduling while atomic issue caused by rv8803_set_time()
holding a spinlock during the call to i2c_smbus_read_byte_data().
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel@de.bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
The Seiko Epson's RTC RX8900 layout register is compatible with the
RV8803. So let's add its ID in order to reuse the same driver.
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
The function can return negative values, so its result should
be assigned to signed variable.
The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/assign_signed_to_unsigned.cocci [1].
[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2046107
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|
|
This driver supports the following functions:
- reading and settings time
- alarms when connected to an IRQ
- reading and clearing the voltage low flags
- nvram
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
|