summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-09-25powercap: include header to fix -Wmissing-prototypesPujin Shi1-0/+1
Include the linux/idle_inject.h header to fix W=1 build warning: drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c:152:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘idle_inject_set_duration’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c:167:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘idle_inject_get_duration’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c:179:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘idle_inject_set_latency’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c:195:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘idle_inject_start’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c:227:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘idle_inject_stop’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c:299:28: warning: no previous prototype for ‘idle_inject_register’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/powercap/idle_inject.c:345:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘idle_inject_unregister’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Pujin Shi <shipj@lemote.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-08-06Merge tag 'sched-fifo-2020-08-04' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-3/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull sched/fifo updates from Ingo Molnar: "This adds the sched_set_fifo*() encapsulation APIs to remove static priority level knowledge from non-scheduler code. The three APIs for non-scheduler code to set SCHED_FIFO are: - sched_set_fifo() - sched_set_fifo_low() - sched_set_normal() These are two FIFO priority levels: default (high), and a 'low' priority level, plus sched_set_normal() to set the policy back to non-SCHED_FIFO. Since the changes affect a lot of non-scheduler code, we kept this in a separate tree" * tag 'sched-fifo-2020-08-04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (24 commits) sched,tracing: Convert to sched_set_fifo() sched: Remove sched_set_*() return value sched: Remove sched_setscheduler*() EXPORTs sched,psi: Convert to sched_set_fifo_low() sched,rcutorture: Convert to sched_set_fifo_low() sched,rcuperf: Convert to sched_set_fifo_low() sched,locktorture: Convert to sched_set_fifo() sched,irq: Convert to sched_set_fifo() sched,watchdog: Convert to sched_set_fifo() sched,serial: Convert to sched_set_fifo() sched,powerclamp: Convert to sched_set_fifo() sched,ion: Convert to sched_set_normal() sched,powercap: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() sched,spi: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() sched,mmc: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() sched,ivtv: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() sched,drm/scheduler: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() sched,msm: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() sched,psci: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() sched,drbd: Convert to sched_set_fifo*() ...
2020-07-09powercap: idle_inject: Replace play_idle() with play_idle_precise() in commentsYangtao Li1-5/+5
After commit 333cff6c963fbc ("powercap/drivers/idle_inject: Specify idle state max latency"), we convert to use play_idle_precise() with max allowed latency to specify the idle state. Some function comments still use play_idle(), let's update it to play_idle_precise(). Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frank Lee <frank@allwinnertech.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-06-15sched,powercap: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()Peter Zijlstra1-3/+1
Because SCHED_FIFO is a broken scheduler model (see previous patches) take away the priority field, the kernel can't possibly make an informed decision. Effectively no change. Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-05-19powercap/drivers/idle_inject: Specify idle state max latencyDaniel Lezcano1-1/+15
Currently the idle injection framework uses the play_idle() function which puts the current CPU in an idle state. The idle state is the deepest one, as specified by the latency constraint when calling the subsequent play_idle_precise() function with the INT_MAX. The idle_injection is used by the cpuidle_cooling device which computes the idle / run duration to mitigate the temperature by injecting idle cycles. The cooling device has no control on the depth of the idle state. Allow finer control of the idle injection mechanism by allowing to specify the latency for the idle state. Thus the cooling device has the ability to have a guarantee on the exit latency of the idle states it is injecting. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200429103644.5492-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2020-03-04powercap: idle_inject: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] Lastly, fix the following checkpatch warning: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned long' over 'unsigned long int' as the int is unnecessary + unsigned long int cpumask[]; This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-09-03powercap: idle_inject: Use higher resolution for idle injectionDaniel Lezcano1-26/+27
The resolution of the idle injection is limited to 1ms. If there is a need for an injection of 1.2 ms, it is not possible. The idle injection API is not yet used, so it is safe to convert the existing API to the new time unit instead of adding more functions. Convert to microsecond in order to use a finer grain time unit when injecting idle cycles. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-09-03cpuidle: play_idle: Increase the resolution to usecDaniel Lezcano1-1/+1
The play_idle resolution is 1ms. The intel_powerclamp bases the idle duration on jiffies. The idle injection API is also using msec based duration but has no user yet. Unfortunately, msec based time does not fit well when we want to inject idle cycle precisely with shallow idle state. In order to set the scene for the incoming idle injection user, move the precision up to usec when calling play_idle. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-07-02powercap / idle_inject: Add an idle injection frameworkDaniel Lezcano1-0/+356
Initially, the cpu_cooling device for ARM was changed by adding a new policy inserting idle cycles. The intel_powerclamp driver does a similar action. Instead of implementing idle injections privately in the cpu_cooling device, move the idle injection code in a dedicated framework and give the opportunity to other frameworks to make use of it. The framework relies on the smpboot kthreads which handles via its main loop the common code for hotplugging and [un]parking. This code was previously tested with the cpu cooling device and went through several iterations. It results now in split code and API exported in the header file. It was tested with the cpu cooling device with success. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Rewrite of all comments ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>